• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不规则散光患者的人工晶状体屈光度计算。

Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism.

机构信息

Bristol Eye Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Lower Maudlin St, Bristol, BS1 2LX, UK.

Sourasky Tel-Aviv Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;260(12):3889-3895. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z. Epub 2022 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z
PMID:35776172
Abstract

PURPOSE

Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in subjects with irregular astigmatism is challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy of using Scheimpflug-derived central 2-mm equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) values for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism.

METHODS

This retrospective study included subjects (31 eyes of 30 patients) who underwent cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods. We compared prediction error (PE) and absolute PE (APE) outcomes using SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formulas for keratometry data obtained from the IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam (anterior corneal sim k) devices.

RESULTS

Cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods resulted in improved visual acuity (uncorrected: from 1.13 ± 0.38 to 0.65 ± 0.46 logMar, p < 0.01; best-corrected: from 0.45 ± 0.24 to 0.26 ± 0.20 logMar, p < 0.01) after surgery. The percentage of subjects with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 was 22%, < 6/9 was 58%, and < 6/12 was 71%. For both the SRK/T and the Barrett formulas, the PE was similar to those obtained by IOLMaster (> 0.14) but lower than those obtained by the anterior corneal sim k (p < 0.02). IOLMaster provided keratometry reading in only 23/31 (74.1%) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Scheimpflug central 2-mm EKR for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism was beneficial in terms of visual acuity improvement. It had comparable refractive prediction performance to the IOLMaster 500 and better than the anterior corneal sim K. The 2-mm EKR method can be used when IOLMaster cannot provide a reliable reading in abnormal corneas.

摘要

目的

在不规则散光患者中准确计算人工晶状体(IOL)具有挑战性。本研究评估了使用 Scheimpflug 衍生的中央 2mm 等效角膜曲率读数(EKR)值进行 IOL 计算在不规则散光中的准确性。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 30 例患者(31 只眼),这些患者接受了白内障手术和 IOL 计算,使用 2mm 中央 EKR 方法。我们比较了使用 IOLMaster 500 和 Pentacam(前角膜模拟 k)设备获得的角膜曲率数据,SRK/T 和 Barrett Universal II 公式的预测误差(PE)和绝对 PE(APE)结果。

结果

使用 2mm 中央 EKR 方法进行白内障手术和 IOL 计算可改善视力(未矫正:从 1.13±0.38 提高至 0.65±0.46 logMar,p<0.01;最佳矫正:从 0.45±0.24 提高至 0.26±0.20 logMar,p<0.01)。术后最佳矫正视力为 6/6 的患者比例为 22%,<6/9 的比例为 58%,<6/12 的比例为 71%。对于 SRK/T 和 Barrett 公式,PE 与 IOLMaster 获得的值相似(>0.14),但低于前角膜模拟 k 获得的值(p<0.02)。IOLMaster 仅在 23/31(74.1%)例中提供了角膜曲率读数。

结论

在不规则散光中使用 Scheimpflug 中央 2mm EKR 进行 IOL 计算在提高视力方面是有益的。它的屈光预测性能与 IOLMaster 500 相当,优于前角膜模拟 K。当 IOLMaster 无法在前异常角膜中提供可靠读数时,可以使用 2mm EKR 方法。

相似文献

1
Intraocular lens power calculation in patients with irregular astigmatism.不规则散光患者的人工晶状体屈光度计算。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;260(12):3889-3895. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05729-z. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
2
Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.比较白内障手术中使用常规角膜曲率计或总角膜曲率计进行 IOL 屈光力计算的屈光效果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec;257(12):2677-2682. doi: 10.1007/s00417-019-04443-7. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
3
Accuracy of refractive outcomes using standard or total keratometry for intraocular lens power formulas in conventional cataract surgery.在常规白内障手术中,使用标准或总角膜曲率计进行眼内透镜屈光力公式的准确性。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 7;23(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-03094-x.
4
Predictability of Refractive Outcome of a Small-Aperture Intraocular Lens in Eyes With Irregular Corneal Astigmatism.小切口人工晶状体矫正不规则角膜散光眼的预测性研究。
J Refract Surg. 2021 May;37(5):312-317. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210222-03. Epub 2021 May 1.
5
Comparison of astigmatism prediction error taken with the Pentacam measurements, Baylor nomogram, and Barrett formula for toric intraocular lens implantation.比较用于散光人工晶状体植入的Pentacam测量、贝勒列线图和巴雷特公式所测得的散光预测误差。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug 24;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0550-z.
6
Toric intraocular lens power calculation in cataract patients with keratoconus.圆锥角膜白内障患者的 toric 人工晶状体的计算。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Nov 1;47(11):1389-1397. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000638.
7
Comparison of refractive outcomes using Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry or IOLMaster 700 keratometry for IOL power calculation.比较使用 Scheimpflug Holladay 等效角膜曲率计或 IOLMaster 700 角膜曲率计进行 IOL 屈光力计算的屈光结果。
Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Jun;41(6):2205-2212. doi: 10.1007/s10792-021-01781-6. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
[Alternative method of intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length].[短眼轴眼内人工晶状体屈光力计算的替代方法]
Vestn Oftalmol. 2022;138(3):24-28. doi: 10.17116/oftalma202213803124.
9
Comparison of the Accuracy Between the Z CALC2 Calculator and Barrett Toric Calculator in Toric IOL Calculation.Z CALC2 计算器与 Barrett Toric 计算器在 toric IOL 计算中的准确性比较。
J Refract Surg. 2024 Oct;40(10):e681-e691. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20240731-01. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
10
Algorithmic intraocular lens power calculation formula selection by keratometry, anterior chamber depth and axial length.基于角膜曲率计、前房深度和眼轴长度的人工晶状体计算公式选择的算法。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 May;100(3):e701-e709. doi: 10.1111/aos.14956. Epub 2021 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The refractive accuracy between topographic keratometry and biometric keratometry for extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens implantation.用于扩展焦深人工晶状体植入的地形图角膜曲率测量法与生物测量角膜曲率测量法之间的屈光精度。
Int J Med Sci. 2024 Nov 4;21(15):2912-2918. doi: 10.7150/ijms.99907. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Aberrometric, Keratometric, and Visual Outcomes After Trans-Epithelial Topography-Guided Phototherapeutic Keratectomy for the Treatment of Irregular Corneas.经上皮地形图引导的光治疗性角膜切削术治疗不规则角膜后的像差、角膜曲率及视觉结果
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 7;15:3777-3786. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S324386. eCollection 2021.
2
Reply.回复。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Apr;128(4):e21-e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.037. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
3
Intraocular lens calculations in patients with keratoectatic disorders.角膜病变患者的人工晶状体计算。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;31(4):284-287. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000671.
4
Development of a new intraocular lens power calculation method based on lens position estimated with optical coherence tomography.基于光学相干断层扫描估计的晶状体位置的新型人工晶状体屈光度计算方法的开发。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 16;10(1):6501. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63546-y.
5
Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Formulas Modified for Patients with Keratoconus.角膜变形患者的人工晶状体计算公式的准确性。
Ophthalmology. 2020 Aug;127(8):1037-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
6
Intraocular lens power calculation in keratoconus; A review of literature.圆锥角膜的人工晶状体度数计算;文献综述
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 15;31(2):127-134. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.01.011. eCollection 2019 Jun.
7
Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices.使用两种基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描的生物测量仪进行眼生物测量和屈光结果测量,这两种生物测量仪的分段或等效折射率不同。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):6557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3.
8
Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with keratoconus.圆锥角膜眼的人工晶状体屈光力计算。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 May;45(5):576-581. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.11.029. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
9
Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for a quadrifocal intraocular lens.比较四种焦点人工晶状体的 9 种现代人工晶状体计算公式。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Aug;44(8):942-948. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.021.
10
Estimation of intraocular lens position from full crystalline lens geometry: towards a new generation of intraocular lens power calculation formulas.从完整的晶状体几何形状估算人工晶状体位置:迈向新一代人工晶状体屈光力计算公式。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 29;8(1):9829. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28272-6.