Myeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1201-1208. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1769.
As the incidence of cancer and metabolic disorders, such as obesity, concurrently rise, there has been increasing awareness of the pervasive effect of nutrition. The whole foods plant-based diet (WFPBD) and ketogenic diet (KD) have gained popularity in oncology, and this topic is increasingly permeating clinical dialogue.
Dietary intake is associated with multiple pathways involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Consumption of a plant-enriched diet is associated with reduced cancer incidence and is recommended by dietary guidelines for cancer prevention. Despite a starkly different nutrient composition, a WFPBD and KD can be associated with weight loss, decreased inflammation, and decreased insulin levels. In addition, a WFPBD is associated with increased fiber, phytochemicals, and butyrate levels and decreased insulin-like growth factor 1 levels, whereas a KD exerts potential anticancer effects by increasing β hydroxybutyrate levels. A KD may be of interest in select, less common settings, such as tumors treated with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors, which induce hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia. Completed interventional trials have focused on increasing fruit and vegetable intake or reducing fat intake but have not specifically tested WFPBD or KD for cancer prevention or treatment. Currently available data support plant-based diets as opposed to KD as part of a lifestyle associated with reduced cancer risk. In the postdiagnosis setting, there are currently no rigorously tested approaches that support the recommendation of any diet to treat cancer.
The results of this review suggest that the collective evidence supports plant-enriched diets vs KD for the reduction of cancer risk and the improvement of metabolic disorders in survivors. Additional prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to encourage use of dietary modification across the cancer continuum. Rigorous trial designs that adapt classical oncologic end points may identify populations that are likely to benefit from starkly contrasting diets. Current data support prioritization of plant-based diets, and future data could further personalize dietary recommendations in cancer populations.
随着癌症和代谢紊乱(如肥胖症)的发病率同时上升,人们对营养的普遍影响的认识日益增强。全食物植物性饮食(WFPBD)和生酮饮食(KD)在肿瘤学中越来越受欢迎,这个话题也越来越多地渗透到临床对话中。
饮食摄入与癌症发生和肿瘤进展涉及的多种途径有关。食用富含植物的饮食与癌症发病率降低有关,并且被癌症预防饮食指南推荐。尽管营养成分截然不同,但 WFPBD 和 KD 都可以与体重减轻、炎症减少和胰岛素水平降低相关。此外,WFPBD 与增加纤维、植物化学物质和丁酸盐水平以及降低胰岛素样生长因子 1 水平有关,而 KD 通过增加β-羟丁酸水平发挥潜在的抗癌作用。KD 在某些特定的、不太常见的情况下可能会引起关注,例如接受磷脂酰肌醇 3-激酶抑制剂治疗的肿瘤,这些肿瘤会导致高胰岛素血症和高血糖。已完成的干预性试验主要集中在增加水果和蔬菜的摄入量或减少脂肪的摄入量,但没有专门测试 WFPBD 或 KD 是否可以预防或治疗癌症。目前可用的数据支持植物性饮食而不是 KD,作为降低癌症风险的生活方式的一部分。在诊断后阶段,目前没有经过严格测试的方法可以支持推荐任何饮食来治疗癌症。
本综述的结果表明,现有证据总体上支持富含植物的饮食优于 KD,可以降低癌症风险和改善幸存者的代谢紊乱。需要进一步开展前瞻性随机临床试验,鼓励在癌症全程中进行饮食调整。适应经典肿瘤学终点的严格试验设计可能会确定可能受益于截然不同饮食的人群。目前的数据支持植物性饮食的优先地位,未来的数据可能会进一步使癌症患者的饮食建议个性化。