• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Restrictions on Tobacco Sales to Youth Younger Than 21 Years in Cleveland, Ohio, Area.评估俄亥俄州克利夫兰地区对向 21 岁以下青少年销售烟草的限制。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222987. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22987.
2
Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students - National Youth Tobacco Survey, United States, 2021.中学生使用烟草制品及相关因素 - 2021 年美国全国青少年烟草调查。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Mar 11;71(5):1-29. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7105a1.
3
Racial/Ethnic Differences in Associations of Non-cigarette Tobacco Product Use With Subsequent Initiation of Cigarettes in US Youths.非香烟烟草制品使用与美国青少年后续香烟使用的关联在种族/民族差异。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 May 24;23(6):900-908. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa170.
4
A Rapid Evaluation of the US Federal Tobacco 21 (T21) Law and Lessons From Statewide T21 Policies: Findings From Population-Level Surveys.美国联邦烟草 21 法案的快速评估及全州范围 T21 政策的经验教训:基于人群水平调查的结果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2022 Jun 2;19:E29. doi: 10.5888/pcd19.210430.
5
Trends of Single, Dual, and Polytobacco Use Among School-Based Students in the United States: An Analysis of the National Youth Tobacco Survey.美国基于学校学生中单、双、多烟草制品使用趋势:国家青年烟草调查分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Nov;37(8):1078-1090. doi: 10.1177/08901171231191557. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
6
Trends in Tobacco Use Among Adolescents by Grade, Sex, and Race, 1991-2019.1991 年至 2019 年,不同年级、性别和种族青少年的烟草使用趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027465. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27465.
7
Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students - 
United States, 2019.中学生烟草制品使用及相关因素分析- 
美国,2019 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Nov 6;68(12):1-22. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6812a1.
8
Association between school-based tobacco retailer exposures and young adolescent cigarette, cigar and e-cigarette use.学校周边烟草零售商暴露与青少年吸烟、雪茄烟和电子烟使用的关联。
Tob Control. 2021 Dec;30(e2):e104-e110. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055764. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
Local Tobacco 21 Policies are Associated With Lower Odds of Tobacco Use Among Adolescents.地方烟草21政策与青少年吸烟几率降低相关。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):478-483. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab200.
10
Trends in Nicotine Product Use Among US Adolescents, 1999-2020.美国青少年尼古丁产品使用趋势,1999-2020 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2118788. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18788.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of Tobacco 21 policies and youth tobacco use: implications for future policy research.对21岁烟草限购政策与青少年烟草使用的系统评价和荟萃分析:对未来政策研究的启示
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Aug 8;50:101208. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101208. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
How adolescent tobacco use has responded to state tobacco 21 laws and flavor restrictions.青少年烟草使用情况如何应对各州的烟草21岁限购法及口味限制。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2025;51(3):360-371. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2024.2444567. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
3
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of population-level interventions to tackle smoking behaviour.一项关于解决吸烟行为的人群层面干预措施的系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Dec;8(12):2367-2391. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02002-7. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
4
What is the Relationship Between Raising the Minimum Legal Sales Age of Tobacco Above 20 and Cigarette Smoking? A Systematic Review.将烟草最低合法销售年龄提高到20岁以上与吸烟之间有什么关系?一项系统综述。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Feb 24;27(3):369-377. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae206.
5
Sex Differences in E-Cigarette Use and Related Health Effects.电子烟使用与相关健康影响的性别差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Nov 18;20(22):7079. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20227079.
6
Association Between Historical Neighborhood Redlining and Cardiovascular Outcomes Among US Veterans With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases.历史邻里红线与美国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病退伍军人心血管结局的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322727. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22727.

本文引用的文献

1
E-cigarette Use Among Middle and High School Students in New York City Before and After Passage of Tobacco 21.纽约市烟草21法案通过前后的中学生电子烟使用情况
Tob Use Insights. 2022 Jan 6;15:1179173X211065997. doi: 10.1177/1179173X211065997. eCollection 2022.
2
Local Tobacco 21 Policies are Associated With Lower Odds of Tobacco Use Among Adolescents.地方烟草21政策与青少年吸烟几率降低相关。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Mar 1;24(4):478-483. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab200.
3
Geographical distribution and social determinants of Tobacco 21 policy adoption and retail inspections in the United States, 2015-2019.2015 - 2019年美国烟草21政策采用情况及零售检查的地理分布和社会决定因素
Tob Induc Dis. 2021 Sep 16;19:55. doi: 10.18332/tid/140148. eCollection 2021.
4
Spatial Disparities: The Role of Nativity in Neighborhood Exposure to Alcohol and Tobacco Retailers.空间差异:出生地在邻里接触烟酒零售商方面的作用。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Aug;24(4):945-955. doi: 10.1007/s10903-021-01277-6. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
5
Population-Level Interventions and Health Disparities: The Devil is in the Detail.人群层面的干预措施与健康差异:细节决定成败。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Nov 5;23(12):1985-1986. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab184.
6
Adoption of Tobacco 21: A Cross-Case Analysis of Ten US States.采用烟草 21:对十个美国州的跨案例分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 5;18(11):6096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116096.
7
California's tobacco 21 minimum sales age law and adolescents' tobacco and nicotine use: differential associations among racial and ethnic groups.加利福尼亚州烟草最低销售年龄21岁法律与青少年烟草和尼古丁使用:种族和族裔群体之间的差异关联
Tob Control. 2022 Dec;31(e2):e126-e133. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056219. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
8
Beyond Strong Enforcement: Understanding the Factors Related to Retailer Compliance With Tobacco 21.超越强力执行:理解与零售商遵守烟草 21 相关的因素。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Nov 5;23(12):2084-2090. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab093.
9
Tobacco 21 Policies in the U.S.: The Importance of Local Control With Federal Policy.美国的烟草 21 政策:地方控制与联邦政策同等重要。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 May;60(5):639-647. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
10
Overview and Methods for the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System - United States, 2019.《2019 年美国青年风险行为监测系统概述和方法》。
MMWR Suppl. 2020 Aug 21;69(1):1-10. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su6901a1.

评估俄亥俄州克利夫兰地区对向 21 岁以下青少年销售烟草的限制。

Evaluation of Restrictions on Tobacco Sales to Youth Younger Than 21 Years in Cleveland, Ohio, Area.

机构信息

Prevention Research Center for Healthy Neighborhoods, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222987. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22987.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22987
PMID:35819781
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9277498/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Tobacco 21 (T21) policies raise the minimum legal age to purchase tobacco from 18 to 21 years to curb youth access to tobacco products. While some studies have found that T21 is associated with reducing prevalence of youth tobacco use, little is known about the impact it may have on youth of different racial and ethnic identities.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of T21 policy with the prevalence of high school youth tobacco use across sex, race, and ethnicity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This survey study used representative survey data collected from the local biennial Youth Risk Behavior Survey from 2013 to 2017 comparing Cleveland, Ohio (which has a T21 policy), to proximal jurisdictions in the first-ring suburbs in Cuyahoga County (which do not have T21 policies). Within-Cleveland demographic information was also collected for 2013 to 2019. Overall high school youth tobacco use rates were compared between Cleveland and the first-ring suburbs and then examined within Cleveland among Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White high school students. Percentage data were adjusted to more closely align with local population demographics. Data were analyzed from January to June 2022.

EXPOSURES

T21 was implemented in Cleveland in 2016 and not adopted in proximal jurisdictions or at the state and federal level until at least 1 year later.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were prevalence of past 30-day cigarette, cigar product, or e-cigarette use, measured using geographically representative high school youth survey data from 2013 to 2015 (prelegislation) and 2017 to 2019 (postlegislation) and compared using a difference-in-differences analysis.

RESULTS

The unweighted sample included 12 616 high school students (27.0% [95% CI, 26.9%-28.0%] in 10th grade; 50.9% [95% CI, 50.3%-51.6%] females) participating in 1 or more Youth Risk Behavior Surveys from 2013 to 2019, including 7064 students in Cleveland and 5552 students in the first-ring suburbs. Compared with the first-ring suburbs, Cleveland had a greater proportion of younger students (1623 [28.5%] ninth grade students vs 2179 [34.0%] ninth grade students) and Hispanic students (436 students [1.1%] vs 1433 students [12.6%]) and non-Hispanic Black students (2000 students [53.1%] vs 3971 students [75.1%]). Cigars were the most commonly used tobacco product in Cleveland, with use reported by 6201 students (19.8%) in 2013, 5877 students (21.3%) in 2015, and 5784 students (16.8%) in 2019. Compared with the first-ring suburbs, there was a greater decline in prevalence of use of cigars in Cleveland (β = 0.18 [SE, 0.05]; P < .001). The disparity across race, ethnicity, and sex decreased for all current tobacco product use. For example, the maximum difference between demographic subpopulations in current cigarette use was 11.6 (95% CI, 9.5-13.7) percentage points in 2013 between White females (16.1% [95% CI, 11.3%-20.8%]) and Black males (4.5% [95% CI, 3.5%-5.4%]). This maximum difference in current cigarette use decreased significantly to 5.1 (95% CI, 3.5-6.7) percentage points in 2019 between White females (6.9% [95% CI, 3.4%-10.3%]) and Black females (1.8% [95% CI, 0.7%-2.8%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This survey study found that there was a decline in youth-reported tobacco use across every tobacco product category from 2013 to 2019. This decline changed the trajectory of use among several demographic groups and brought the youth populations with the highest tobacco product use to similar rates of others.

摘要

重要性:烟草 21 (T21)政策将购买烟草的最低法定年龄从 18 岁提高到 21 岁,以遏制年轻人接触烟草产品。虽然一些研究发现 T21 与减少青少年烟草使用的流行率有关,但对于不同种族和族裔的年轻人可能产生的影响知之甚少。

目的:评估 T21 政策与高中青少年烟草使用流行率之间的关联,考虑到性别、种族和族裔的差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这项调查研究使用了代表克利夫兰市(俄亥俄州)和凯霍加县第一环郊区(没有 T21 政策)的当地每两年一次的青年风险行为调查的数据,比较了 2013 年至 2017 年的数据。克利夫兰市的内部人口统计数据也从 2013 年到 2019 年进行了收集。比较了克利夫兰市和第一环郊区的整体高中青少年烟草使用率,然后在克利夫兰市的西班牙裔、非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人高中生中进行了调查。百分比数据进行了调整,以更紧密地与当地人口统计数据保持一致。数据于 2022 年 1 月至 6 月进行分析。

暴露情况:T21 于 2016 年在克利夫兰市实施,至少在一年后才在毗邻的司法管辖区或州和联邦一级采用。

主要结果和措施:主要结果是过去 30 天内吸烟、雪茄产品或电子烟使用的流行率,使用具有地理代表性的高中青少年调查数据进行衡量,数据来自 2013 年至 2015 年(立法前)和 2017 年至 2019 年(立法后),并使用差异差异分析进行比较。

结果:未加权样本包括 12616 名高中生(第 10 年级 27.0% [95% CI,26.9%-28.0%];50.9% [95% CI,50.3%-51.6%]为女性),他们参加了 2013 年至 2019 年期间的 1 次或多次青年风险行为调查,包括克利夫兰市的 7064 名学生和第一环郊区的 5552 名学生。与第一环郊区相比,克利夫兰市有更大比例的低年级学生(1623 名 [28.5%] 为 9 年级学生,而 2179 名 [34.0%] 为 9 年级学生)和西班牙裔学生(436 名 [1.1%],而 1433 名 [12.6%] 为西班牙裔学生)和非西班牙裔黑人学生(2000 名 [53.1%],而 3971 名 [75.1%])。雪茄是克利夫兰市最常使用的烟草产品,2013 年有 6201 名学生(19.8%)报告使用,2015 年有 5877 名学生(21.3%)报告使用,2019 年有 5784 名学生(16.8%)报告使用。与第一环郊区相比,克利夫兰市的雪茄使用流行率下降幅度更大(β=0.18 [SE,0.05];P<0.001)。所有当前烟草产品使用的种族、族裔和性别差异都有所缩小。例如,在 2013 年,白人女性(16.1% [95% CI,11.3%-20.8%])和黑人男性(4.5% [95% CI,3.5%-5.4%])之间的当前香烟使用的最大差异是 11.6(95% CI,9.5-13.7)个百分点,这是所有人口统计学亚群之间的差异。这一最大差异在 2019 年显著下降至 5.1(95% CI,3.5-6.7)个百分点,当时白人女性(6.9% [95% CI,3.4%-10.3%])和黑人女性(1.8% [95% CI,0.7%-2.8%])之间的差异。

结论:这项调查研究发现,从 2013 年到 2019 年,青少年报告的烟草使用在每一种烟草产品类别中都有所下降。这种下降改变了几个人口群体的使用轨迹,并使使用烟草产品最多的年轻人与其他人的使用率相近。