Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China (Y. Wang, L.F., P.G., X.C., Y. Zhu, H.L., G.X., Y. Wu).
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China (G.Z., X. Lan, H.D.).
Circulation. 2022 Jul 26;146(4):303-315. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059045. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
More than one-fifth of the world's population consumes Chinese cuisines regularly, but no evidence-based healthy diets fitting the Chinese food culture are available for implementation.
A multicenter, patient- and outcome assessor-blind, randomized feeding trial was conducted among 265 participants with 130 to 159 mm Hg baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) for 4 major Chinese cuisines (Shangdong, Huaiyang, Cantonese, Szechuan). After a 7-day run-in period on a control diet matching the usual local diets, participants were randomized to continue with the control diet or the cuisine-based Chinese heart-healthy diet for another 28 days. The primary outcome was SBP, and secondary outcomes included diastolic blood pressure and food preference score. Linear regression models were used to estimate the intervention effects and adjustments for the center. The incremental cost per 1 mm Hg reduction in SBP was also calculated.
A total of 265 participants were randomized (135 on the Chinese heart-healthy diet and 130 on the control diet), with 52% women, mean age of 56.5±9.8 years, and mean SBP and diastolic blood pressure of 139.4±8.3 and 88.1±8.0 mm Hg, respectively, at baseline. The change in SBP and diastolic blood pressure from baseline to the end of the study in the control group was -5.0 (95% CI, -6.5 to -3.5) mm Hg and -2.8 (95% CI, -3.7 to -1.9) mm Hg, respectively. The net difference of change between the 2 groups in SBP and diastolic blood pressure were -10.0 (95% CI, -12.1 to -7.9) mm Hg and -3.8 (95% CI, -5.0 to -2.5) mm Hg, respectively. The effect size did not differ among cuisines ( for interaction=0.173). The mean food preference score was 9.5 (with 10 the best preferred) at baseline, and the net change during intervention was 0.1 (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.2; =0.558). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per 1 mm Hg SBP reduction was CNY 0.4 (USD 0.06) per day. No difference in the number of adverse events was found between the 2 groups (=0.259), and none of the adverse events was associated with the intervention.
The Chinese heart-healthy diet is effective, palatable, and cost-effective in reducing blood pressure in Chinese adults with high blood pressure, with a clinically significant effect applicable across major Chinese cuisine cultures.
URL: https://www.
gov; Unique identifier: NCT03882645.
世界上超过五分之一的人口经常食用中餐,但没有基于循证医学的适合中国饮食文化的健康饮食可供实施。
一项多中心、患者和结果评估者盲法、随机喂养试验在中国 265 名收缩压基线为 130-159mmHg 的参与者中进行,他们分别接受了 4 种主要的中餐(山东、淮扬、广东、四川)。在为期 7 天的对照饮食适应期后,参与者被随机继续接受对照饮食或基于中餐的心脏健康饮食,为期 28 天。主要结局是收缩压,次要结局包括舒张压和食物偏好评分。线性回归模型用于估计干预效果,并根据中心进行调整。还计算了每降低收缩压 1mmHg 的增量成本效益比。
共有 265 名参与者被随机分配(135 名接受基于中餐的心脏健康饮食,130 名接受对照饮食),其中 52%为女性,平均年龄 56.5±9.8 岁,基线时平均收缩压和舒张压分别为 139.4±8.3mmHg 和 88.1±8.0mmHg。对照组从基线到研究结束时收缩压和舒张压的变化分别为-5.0mmHg(95%CI,-6.5 至-3.5mmHg)和-2.8mmHg(95%CI,-3.7 至-1.9mmHg)。两组收缩压和舒张压的净差值分别为-10.0mmHg(95%CI,-12.1 至-7.9mmHg)和-3.8mmHg(95%CI,-5.0 至-2.5mmHg)。饮食之间的效应大小无差异(交互效应=0.173)。基线时食物偏好评分为 9.5(满分 10),干预期间的净变化为 0.1(95%CI,-0.1 至 0.2;=0.558)。每降低收缩压 1mmHg 的增量成本效益比为 0.4 元人民币(0.06 美元)/天。两组不良事件的数量无差异(=0.259),且无不良事件与干预有关。
基于中餐的心脏健康饮食可有效、美味、且具有成本效益地降低中国高血压成年人的血压,具有临床显著效果,适用于中国主要的饮食文化。
网址:https://www.
gov;唯一标识符:NCT03882645。