• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病例报告:经两阶段单侧双孔道内镜技术(UBE)行五节段单侧椎板切除术双侧减压(ULBD)

Case Report: Five-Level Unilateral Laminectomy Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) by Two-Stage Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE).

作者信息

Wang Wen-Long, Liu Zheng, Wu Si-Jun

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shougang Hospital, Health Science Centre, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2022 Jul 5;9:944509. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.944509. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2022.944509
PMID:35865041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9294320/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a relatively new yet common minimally invasive procedure in spine surgery, capable of achieving adequate decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis through unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression (ULBD). Neither additional fusion nor rigid fixation is required, as UBE-ULBD rarely causes iatrogenic lumbar instability. However, to our knowledge, five-level ULBD two-stage UBE without lumbar fusion has been yet to be reported in the treatment of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present a case of an 80-year-old female patient who developed progressive paralysis of the lower extremities. Radiographic examinations showed multilevel degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and extensive compression of the dural sac and nerve roots from L1-2 to L5-S1. The patient underwent five-level ULBD through two-stage UBE without lumbar fusion or fixation. One week after the final procedure, the patient could ambulate with walking aids and braces. Moreover, no back pain or limited lumbar motion was observed at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Multilevel ULBD through UBE may provide elderly patients with an alternative, minimally invasive procedure for treating spinal stenosis. This procedure could be achieved by staging surgeries. In this case, we reported complaints of little back pain, despite not needing to perform lumbar fusion or fixation.

摘要

引言

单侧双通道内镜技术(UBE)是脊柱外科中一种相对较新但常见的微创手术,能够通过单侧椎板切除双侧减压(ULBD)实现对腰椎管狭窄的充分减压。由于UBE-ULBD很少导致医源性腰椎不稳,因此无需额外的融合或坚强内固定。然而,据我们所知,五级ULBD两阶段UBE且不进行腰椎融合治疗多节段腰椎管狭窄的情况尚未见报道。

病例描述

我们报告一例80岁女性患者,出现进行性下肢瘫痪。影像学检查显示多节段退变性腰椎管狭窄,硬脊膜囊和神经根从L1-2至L5-S1受到广泛压迫。该患者通过两阶段UBE接受了五级ULBD,未进行腰椎融合或固定。最后一次手术后一周,患者可借助助行器和支具行走。此外,在6个月的随访中未观察到背痛或腰椎活动受限。

结论

通过UBE进行多节段ULBD可为老年患者提供一种治疗椎管狭窄的替代微创方法。该手术可通过分期手术完成。在本病例中,我们报告患者尽管未进行腰椎融合或固定,但背痛较轻。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/feba809ff63f/fsurg-09-944509-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/c1819e68c4e1/fsurg-09-944509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/a7d9b952190c/fsurg-09-944509-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/f4e4d56198e4/fsurg-09-944509-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/599abf504f6b/fsurg-09-944509-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/feba809ff63f/fsurg-09-944509-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/c1819e68c4e1/fsurg-09-944509-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/a7d9b952190c/fsurg-09-944509-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/f4e4d56198e4/fsurg-09-944509-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/599abf504f6b/fsurg-09-944509-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b6/9294320/feba809ff63f/fsurg-09-944509-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Case Report: Five-Level Unilateral Laminectomy Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) by Two-Stage Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE).病例报告:经两阶段单侧双孔道内镜技术(UBE)行五节段单侧椎板切除术双侧减压(ULBD)
Front Surg. 2022 Jul 5;9:944509. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.944509. eCollection 2022.
2
Decompression unilateral biportal endoscopy for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A comparative study with decompression open discectomy.单侧双门孔内镜减压治疗重度退行性腰椎管狭窄症:与开放式椎间盘切除术减压的比较研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1132698. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1132698. eCollection 2023.
3
[Comparative study of decompression of unilateral biportal endoscopic compared to laminectomy with fusion and internal fixation in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis].[单侧双门内镜减压术与椎板切除融合内固定术治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的对比研究]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Nov 8;102(41):3281-3287. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220720-01583.
4
Unilateral biportal endoscopy vs. open decompression for lumbar epidural lipomatosis-cohort study using a prospective registry.单通道双孔道内镜与开放减压治疗腰椎硬膜外脂肪增多症的队列研究:一项基于前瞻性登记的研究
Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 24;15:1366357. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1366357. eCollection 2024.
5
A meta-analysis of clinical effects of microscopic unilateral laminectomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus biportal endoscopic ULBD for lumbar canal stenosis.显微镜下单侧椎板切除术双侧减压(ULBD)与双孔道内镜下ULBD治疗腰椎管狭窄症临床疗效的Meta分析。
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 23;9:1002100. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1002100. eCollection 2022.
6
[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].单侧双通道内镜与单通道椎间孔内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 15;38(3):324-330. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202312029.
7
Comparative efficacy of unilateral biportal and percutaneous endoscopic techniques in unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) for lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双通道内镜与经皮内镜技术单侧入路双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 5;25(1):713. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07825-z.
8
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Disc Herniation.单侧双通道内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎间盘突出症
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Jun 27;13(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00020. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
9
Clinical efficacy and imaging outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopy with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis.单侧双门内镜联合单侧椎板切开术双侧减压治疗重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效及影像学结果
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1061566. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1061566. eCollection 2022.
10
Clinical Outcomes of Uniportal and Biportal Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Pair-Matched Case-Control Study.单侧与双通道腰椎内窥镜单侧椎板切开术治疗腰椎管狭窄症双侧减压的临床疗效比较:一项回顾性配对病例对照研究。
World Neurosurg. 2022 May;161:e134-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.01.079. Epub 2022 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of treatment outcomes and analysis of factors interfering with efficacy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing unilateral unichannel and bichannel endoscopic ULBD surgery.单侧单通道与双通道内镜下腰椎管减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的疗效比较及影响疗效因素分析
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 9;20(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05771-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy and Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.经皮内镜单侧椎板切除术和双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):641-650. doi: 10.1111/os.12925. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Clinical Comparison of Full-Endoscopic and Microscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in the Treatment of Elderly Lumbar Spinal stenosis: A Retrospective Study with 12-Month Follow-Up.全内镜与显微镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症的临床比较:一项12个月随访的回顾性研究
J Pain Res. 2020 Jun 11;13:1377-1384. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S254275. eCollection 2020.
3
Full Endoscopic Uniportal Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Highlight of Ligamentum Flavum Detachment and Survey of Efficacy and Safety in 2 Years of Follow-up.
全内镜单通道单侧椎板切开术治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的双侧减压:黄韧带游离的要点及 2 年随访的疗效和安全性观察。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:e672-e681. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.162. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
4
Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.双通道内窥镜与显微镜下腰椎减压椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的随机对照试验。
Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
5
Is the Use of a Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Approach Associated with Rapid Recovery After Lumbar Decompressive Laminectomy? A Preliminary Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎减压术后快速康复?一项前瞻性随机对照试验的初步分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e709-e718. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.04.240. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Is biportal technique/endoscopic spinal surgery satisfactory for lumbar spinal stenosis patients?: A prospective randomized comparative study.双孔技术/内镜下脊柱手术对腰椎管狭窄症患者是否令人满意?一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(18):e15451. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015451.
7
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Fusion Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.随机对照试验:融合手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1413-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513721.
8
Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results.经皮双门内镜下减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:技术说明及初步临床结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Apr;24(4):602-7. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.SPINE15304. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
9
Irrigation endoscopic decompressive laminotomy. A new endoscopic approach for spinal stenosis decompression.冲洗式内镜减压椎板切除术。一种用于脊柱狭窄减压的新内镜手术方法。
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2282-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
10
Bilateral spinal decompression of lumbar central stenosis with the full-endoscopic interlaminar versus microsurgical laminotomy technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.全内镜下椎板间入路与显微外科椎板切开术治疗双侧腰椎中央管狭窄症的前瞻性随机对照研究
Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):61-70.