Department of Sociology, University of Helsinkigrid.7737.4, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
mSystems. 2022 Aug 30;7(4):e0015022. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00150-22. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global concern that is geographically unevenly distributed, with low- and middle-income countries and African countries suffering in particular. The World Health Organization (WHO) Global Action Plan (GAP) for antimicrobial resistance identified five key objectives that aim to ensure the continued treatment and prevention of infectious diseases with the use of antibiotics. Countries signatory to the WHO GAP are expected to develop their own national action plans (NAPs) based on the global model. How low-income countries are able to achieve the GAP objectives is not well understood. This paper analyzes the progress of two West African countries in achieving the GAP targets, Benin and Burkina Faso, countries among the lowest bracket in the World Development Index. We present qualitative data from interviews and focus group discussions with local policy-makers, nurses, doctors, animal breeders, veterinarians, and laboratory researchers, supported by participant observations and surveys within rural communities. The analysis is organized according to the five WHO GAP objectives to show the countries' challenges in fulfilling them. The analysis shows that there are shortcomings in all of the WHO GAP areas in the two countries, making it a compounded and multifactorial problem-a stacking of lacks. In such contexts, calibrating a society toward AMR resilience/prevention requires overall development and attention to interdependencies. Active local research and policy communities with international, sustained financial support are essential for achieving the targets. The burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is unequally distributed across the globe. Low-income countries face a more severe AMR situation and have fewer means to solve the problem. This paper brings out the voices of local experts, policy-makers, and members of the community in Benin and Burkina Faso across human health, animal health, and food production sectors, where the majority of antibiotic use is concentrated. We describe the difficulties that they face in implementing global action plans, targets set by the World Health Organization, for securing antibiotics and preventing the spread of antimicrobial resistance. This paper argues that the various deficits in implementation are stacked, multisectoral, and compounded. We highlight the role of active local scientists and policy-maker networks in setting priorities to address the AMR problem; however, their activities need technical and financial support from international partners.
抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)是一个全球性问题,其分布在地理上不均匀,中低收入国家和非洲国家尤其受到影响。世界卫生组织(WHO)的抗微生物药物耐药性全球行动计划(GAP)确定了五个主要目标,旨在确保继续使用抗生素治疗和预防传染病。签署世卫组织 GAP 的国家预计将根据全球模式制定自己的国家行动计划(NAP)。低收入国家如何实现 GAP 目标还不太清楚。本文分析了两个西非国家贝宁和布基纳法索在实现 GAP 目标方面的进展情况,这两个国家在世界发展指数中处于最低档次。我们提供了来自当地政策制定者、护士、医生、饲养员、兽医和实验室研究人员的访谈和焦点小组讨论的定性数据,辅以农村社区的参与观察和调查。分析是根据世卫组织 GAP 的五个目标进行组织的,以展示各国在实现这些目标方面面临的挑战。分析表明,在这两个国家,世卫组织 GAP 的所有领域都存在缺陷,这是一个复杂的、多因素的问题——一种缺陷的叠加。在这种情况下,使社会适应抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)的弹性/预防需要全面发展和关注相互依存关系。拥有国际支持的、持续的财政支持的活跃的地方研究和政策社区对于实现目标至关重要。抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)在全球的分布不均。低收入国家面临更严重的 AMR 情况,解决问题的手段更少。本文介绍了来自贝宁和布基纳法索的当地专家、政策制定者和社区成员在人类健康、动物健康和食品生产部门的声音,这些部门是抗生素使用的主要集中地。我们描述了他们在实施全球行动计划、世界卫生组织设定的目标方面面临的困难,以确保抗生素的供应和防止抗微生物药物耐药性的传播。本文认为,实施方面的各种缺陷是相互叠加的、多部门的、复杂的。我们强调了积极的地方科学家和政策制定者网络在确定优先事项以解决 AMR 问题方面的作用;然而,他们的活动需要国际伙伴提供技术和财政支持。