Swinamer D L, Phang P T, Jones R L, Grace M, King E G
Crit Care Med. 1987 Jul;15(7):637-43. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198707000-00002.
Resting energy expenditure (EE) is often used as the basis of nutritional support for critically ill patients but whether resting EE is representative of total daily EE is not known. EE was measured for 24 h in ten mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients (average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 23) to determine EE, resting EE, and the energy expended during various ICU activities. Although activities, such as weighing the patient on a sling-type bed scale, repositioning, and chest physiotherapy resulted in dramatic EE increases above resting levels (36%, 31%, and 20%, respectively), the actual contribution of these activities to total EE was small (1.1%, 2.1%, and 3.6%, respectively). The mean measured resting EE was 47.3 +/- 22.3% above mean predicted EE based on the Harris and Benedict equation, and the mean total 24-h EE was 6.9 +/- 2.6(SD)% above the mean measured resting EE. In this group of mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients, an activity factor of no greater than 10% above resting EE is appropriate.
静息能量消耗(EE)常被用作危重症患者营养支持的基础,但静息EE是否代表每日总EE尚不清楚。对10名机械通气的危重症患者(急性生理与慢性健康状况评分II平均为23分)进行了24小时的EE测量,以确定EE、静息EE以及在各种重症监护病房(ICU)活动期间消耗的能量。尽管诸如在吊带式病床秤上称量患者体重、重新摆放体位和胸部物理治疗等活动会使EE比静息水平大幅增加(分别增加36%、31%和20%),但这些活动对总EE的实际贡献很小(分别为1.1%、2.1%和3.6%)。基于哈里斯和本尼迪克特方程,测得的平均静息EE比预测的平均EE高47.3±22.3%,24小时平均总EE比测得的平均静息EE高6.9±2.6(标准差)%。在这组机械通气的危重症患者中,活动系数比静息EE高不超过10%是合适的。