Suppr超能文献

动态早期预警评分预测呼吸疾病患者临床恶化。

Dynamic early warning scores for predicting clinical deterioration in patients with respiratory disease.

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.

NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Respir Res. 2022 Aug 11;23(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02130-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Early Warning Score-2 (NEWS-2) is used to detect patient deterioration in UK hospitals but fails to take account of the detailed granularity or temporal trends in clinical observations. We used data-driven methods to develop dynamic early warning scores (DEWS) to address these deficiencies, and tested their accuracy in patients with respiratory disease for predicting (1) death or intensive care unit admission, occurring within 24 h (D/ICU), and (2) clinically significant deterioration requiring urgent intervention, occurring within 4 h (CSD).

METHODS

Clinical observations data were extracted from electronic records for 31,590 respiratory in-patient episodes from April 2015 to December 2020 at a large acute NHS Trust. The timing of D/ICU was extracted for all episodes. 1100 in-patient episodes were annotated manually to record the timing of CSD, defined as a specific event requiring a change in treatment. Time series features were entered into logistic regression models to derive DEWS for each of the clinical outcomes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was the primary measure of model accuracy.

RESULTS

AUROC (95% confidence interval) for predicting D/ICU was 0.857 (0.852-0.862) for NEWS-2 and 0.906 (0.899-0.914) for DEWS in the validation data. AUROC for predicting CSD was 0.829 (0.817-0.842) for NEWS-2 and 0.877 (0.862-0.892) for DEWS. NEWS-2 ≥ 5 had sensitivity of 88.2% and specificity of 54.2% for predicting CSD, while DEWS ≥ 0.021 had higher sensitivity of 93.6% and approximately the same specificity of 54.3% for the same outcome. Using these cut-offs, 315 out of 347 (90.8%) CSD events were detected by both NEWS-2 and DEWS, at the time of the event or within the previous 4 h; 12 (3.5%) were detected by DEWS but not by NEWS-2, while 4 (1.2%) were detected by NEWS-2 but not by DEWS; 16 (4.6%) were not detected by either scoring system.

CONCLUSION

We have developed DEWS that display greater accuracy than NEWS-2 for predicting clinical deterioration events in patients with respiratory disease. Prospective validation studies are required to assess whether DEWS can be used to reduce missed deteriorations and false alarms in real-life clinical settings.

摘要

背景

国家早期预警评分-2(NEWS-2)用于检测英国医院的患者病情恶化,但未能考虑临床观察的详细粒度或时间趋势。我们使用数据驱动的方法开发了动态早期预警评分(DEWS)来解决这些缺陷,并在呼吸疾病患者中测试了它们预测(1)24 小时内死亡或入住重症监护病房(D/ICU),以及(2)需要紧急干预的临床显著恶化的准确性,在 4 小时内发生(CSD)。

方法

从 2015 年 4 月至 2020 年 12 月在一家大型急性 NHS 信托基金的 31590 例呼吸住院患者的电子记录中提取临床观察数据。提取所有病例的 D/ICU 时间。1100 例住院患者被手动标记以记录 CSD 的时间,CSD 定义为需要改变治疗的特定事件。时间序列特征被输入到逻辑回归模型中,为每个临床结果推导 DEWS。接收器操作特征曲线下的面积(AUROC)是衡量模型准确性的主要指标。

结果

在验证数据中,NEWS-2 预测 D/ICU 的 AUROC(95%置信区间)为 0.857(0.852-0.862),DEWS 为 0.906(0.899-0.914)。NEWS-2 预测 CSD 的 AUROC 为 0.829(0.817-0.842),DEWS 为 0.877(0.862-0.892)。NEWS-2≥5 预测 CSD 的敏感性为 88.2%,特异性为 54.2%,而 DEWS≥0.021 的敏感性为 93.6%,特异性为 54.3%,两者几乎相同。使用这些截断值,NEWS-2 和 DEWS 都在事件发生时或之前的 4 小时内检测到 315 例(90.8%)CSD 事件中的 347 例;12 例(3.5%)被 DEWS 检测到但未被 NEWS-2 检测到,而 4 例(1.2%)被 NEWS-2 检测到但未被 DEWS 检测到;16 例(4.6%)未被任何评分系统检测到。

结论

我们已经开发出的 DEWS 比 NEWS-2 对预测呼吸疾病患者的临床恶化事件具有更高的准确性。需要前瞻性验证研究来评估 DEWS 是否可以用于减少现实临床环境中的漏诊恶化和误报。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4725/9367123/31037500b94e/12931_2022_2130_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验