Ben Hassen Tarek, El Bilali Hamid
Program of Policy, Planning, and Development, Department of International Affairs, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
International Centre for Advanced Mediterranean Agronomic Studies (CIHEAM-Bari), Via Ceglie 9, Valenzano, 70010 Bari, Italy.
Foods. 2022 Aug 2;11(15):2301. doi: 10.3390/foods11152301.
As a conflict between two major agricultural powers, the Russia-Ukraine war has various negative socioeconomic impacts that are now being felt internationally and might worsen, notably, for global food security. If the war deepens, the food crisis will worsen, posing a challenge to many countries, especially those that rely on food imports, such as those in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Simultaneously, the war came at a bad time for global food markets because food prices were already high due to disruptions in the supply chain caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, strong global demand, and poor harvests in some countries. Understanding how conflict-related disruptions in global food and fertilizer markets might affect price and availability is critical for understanding the overall impact on global food security. Further, four months into the war, its implications for food security suggest that this review is timely, urgent, and highly needed. Accordingly, this paper aims to investigate the Russia-Ukraine war's direct and indirect impact on global food security. The paper highlights that the war resulted in immediate and far-reaching cascading consequences on global food security: Ukrainian exports have stopped, conscription and population displacement have caused labor shortages, access to fertilizers is restricted, and future harvests are uncertain. First, Ukraine's export capacity has been hampered. Secondly, conscription and population displacement caused labor shortages. Thirdly, access to vital agricultural products such as fertilizers is also constrained. The war may delay spring planting and winter crop harvesting. Further, the war has indirect and cascading effects. Indeed, rising fertilizer costs may reduce their use and crop yields. Moreover, as seen during the 2007-2008 food crisis, export restrictions and speculation are driving up international prices and worsening the situation. Furthermore, the war triggered a panic buying movement at country and individual levels. Finally, the war may jeopardize the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), notably SDG 1 (No poverty), SDG 2 (Zero hunger), and DG 12 (Responsible consumption and production). However, the consequences of the war on food security are being exacerbated by a variety of underlying rigidities, vulnerabilities, and inefficiencies in global food systems. Accordingly, the transition toward healthy, equitable, and ecologically sustainable food systems must be strengthened by adopting urgent and long-term reforms and policies.
作为两个主要农业大国之间的冲突,俄乌战争产生了各种负面的社会经济影响,目前这些影响在国际上已经显现,而且可能会恶化,尤其是对全球粮食安全而言。如果战争进一步升级,粮食危机将加剧,给许多国家带来挑战,特别是那些依赖粮食进口的国家,如中东和北非(MENA)地区的国家。与此同时,这场战争对全球粮食市场来说来得不是时候,因为由于新冠疫情导致供应链中断、全球需求强劲以及一些国家收成不佳,粮食价格已经居高不下。了解全球粮食和化肥市场中与冲突相关的干扰如何影响价格和供应,对于理解对全球粮食安全的总体影响至关重要。此外,战争已持续四个月,其对粮食安全的影响表明本次审查既及时又紧迫,而且非常必要。因此,本文旨在调查俄乌战争对全球粮食安全的直接和间接影响。本文强调,这场战争对全球粮食安全产生了直接且影响深远的连锁反应:乌克兰的出口已经停止,征兵和人口流离失所导致劳动力短缺,化肥供应受限,未来收成也不确定。首先,乌克兰的出口能力受到了阻碍。其次,征兵和人口流离失所导致劳动力短缺。第三,化肥等重要农产品的供应也受到限制。战争可能会推迟春播和冬粮收割。此外,战争还产生了间接和连锁影响。事实上化肥成本上升可能会减少其使用量和作物产量。此外,正如2007 - 2008年粮食危机期间所看到的那样,出口限制和投机行为正在推高国际价格并使情况恶化。此外,战争在国家和个人层面引发了抢购潮。最后,战争可能会危及可持续发展目标(SDGs)的实施,特别是可持续发展目标1(消除贫困)、可持续发展目标2(零饥饿)和可持续发展目标12(负责任的消费和生产)。然而,全球粮食系统中各种潜在的僵化、脆弱性和低效率正在加剧战争对粮食安全的影响。因此,必须通过采取紧急和长期的改革及政策来加强向健康、公平和生态可持续粮食系统的转型。