• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短食品识力量表在波兰互联网用户代表性样本中的验证。

Validation of the Short Food Literacy Questionnaire in the Representative Sample of Polish Internet Users.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion and E-Health, Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-066 Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 6;19(15):9710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159710.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159710
PMID:35955064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9367856/
Abstract

Analogous to health literacy, food literacy can be defined as a set of cognitive and social skills associated with the ability to acquire and understand information about food and nutrition to make appropriate nutritional decisions. In the literature, several terms such as food, nutrition, or nutritional literacy are used in parallel, differing in some aspects of their meaning. Food literacy is an important measure of the effectiveness of nutritional education interventions and appropriate instruments for its measurement should be available in every society. The aim of this study was the assessment of the validity and testing of a proposed model of the Short Food Literacy Questionnaire (SFLQ) culturally adapted into Polish. The analysis was performed on data from an online survey in a representative sample of 1286 adult internet users. Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor (CFA) analyses were performed on two different subsets obtained through random splitting of the initial dataset. The Polish version of the SFLQ had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.841; Guttman split-half coefficient was 0.812). The EFA revealed that the tool had a three-factor latent structure. The distinguished dimensions were 'information accessing', 'knowledge', and 'information appraisal'. The subscales also showed acceptable internal consistency based on the values of the Cronbach's α coefficients (ranging from 0.768 to 0.845). The CFA confirmed a good fit of the three-factor model with at least five indexes achieving acceptable levels (CFI = 0.972, GFI = 0.963, AGFI = 0.940, NFI = 0.959, and RMSEA = 0.059). The validation of the Polish version of the SFLQ revealed, contrary to earlier reports, not a single but a three-factor structure of the instrument. The SFLQ will be an important tool for the assessment of the effectiveness of educational interventions and population studies analyzing the determinants of food literacy in Poland.

摘要

类似于健康素养,食品素养可以被定义为一套认知和社会技能,与获取和理解有关食品和营养信息以做出适当营养决策的能力相关。在文献中,有几个术语如食品、营养或营养素养并行使用,在其含义的某些方面有所不同。食品素养是营养教育干预效果的重要衡量标准,每个社会都应该有适当的测量工具。本研究的目的是评估经文化调整后适用于波兰的短食品素养问卷(SFLQ)的有效性和测试该模型。分析是基于在代表性的 1286 名成年互联网用户的在线调查数据进行的。通过对初始数据集的随机分割,对两个不同子集进行了探索性(EFA)和验证性因素(CFA)分析。SFLQ 的波兰语版本具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α 为 0.841;Guttman 分割半系数为 0.812)。EFA 表明该工具具有三因素潜在结构。区分的维度是“信息获取”、“知识”和“信息评估”。根据 Cronbach's α 系数的值,子量表也显示出可接受的内部一致性(范围从 0.768 到 0.845)。CFA 证实了三因素模型具有良好的拟合度,至少有五个指标达到了可接受的水平(CFI = 0.972,GFI = 0.963,AGFI = 0.940,NFI = 0.959,和 RMSEA = 0.059)。SFLQ 波兰语版本的验证结果表明,与之前的报告相反,该工具不是单一的,而是具有三因素结构。SFLQ 将是评估教育干预效果和分析波兰食品素养决定因素的人群研究的重要工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a836/9367856/1f789ca70ef5/ijerph-19-09710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a836/9367856/d921bab7244b/ijerph-19-09710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a836/9367856/1f789ca70ef5/ijerph-19-09710-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a836/9367856/d921bab7244b/ijerph-19-09710-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a836/9367856/1f789ca70ef5/ijerph-19-09710-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the Short Food Literacy Questionnaire in the Representative Sample of Polish Internet Users.短食品识力量表在波兰互联网用户代表性样本中的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 6;19(15):9710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159710.
2
Development and Validation of a Food and Nutrition Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Adults.开发和验证用于中国成年人的食物和营养素养问卷
Nutrients. 2022 May 5;14(9):1933. doi: 10.3390/nu14091933.
3
Development and validation of a short and easy-to-use instrument for measuring health literacy: the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA).开发和验证一种简短易用的成人健康素养测量工具:成人健康素养量表(HELIA)。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 12;20(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08787-2.
4
The Reliability and Validity of the Telephone-Based and Online Polish eHealth Literacy Scale Based on Two Nationally Representative Samples.基于两个全国代表性样本的基于电话和在线的波兰电子健康素养量表的信度和效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 3;16(17):3216. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173216.
5
Being an Informed Consumer of Health Information and Assessment of Electronic Health Literacy in a National Sample of Internet Users: Validity and Reliability of the e-HLS Instrument.成为健康信息的明智消费者并在全国互联网用户样本中评估电子健康素养:电子健康素养量表(e-HLS)的有效性和可靠性
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 11;18(7):e161. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5496.
6
Progressing the Death Literacy Index: the development of a revised version (DLI-R) and a short format (DLI-9).推进死亡素养指数:修订版(DLI-R)和简版(DLI-9)的开发
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Sep 17;18:26323524241274806. doi: 10.1177/26323524241274806. eCollection 2024.
7
Development and validation of a food and nutrition literacy questionnaire for Chinese school-age children.开发和验证中文版学龄儿童食物与营养素养问卷。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244197. eCollection 2021.
8
Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) among Polish Social Media Users.评估电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)在波兰社交媒体用户中的心理计量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;19(7):4067. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074067.
9
Turkish version of the 'food and nutrition literacy questionnaire for Chinese school-age children' for school-age adolescents: a validity and reliability study.中文版《儿童青少年食物与营养素养问卷》的土耳其语版本:一项信度和效度研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1807. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16732-2.
10
Developing and validating a scale to measure Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) in elementary school children in Iran.开发并验证一个用于测量伊朗小学生食品与营养素养(FNLIT)的量表。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 27;12(6):e0179196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179196. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Hungarian Adaptation and Validation of the Short Food Literacy Questionnaire (SFLQ-HU).《简短食物素养问卷(匈牙利语版,SFLQ-HU)》的匈牙利语改编与验证
Nutrients. 2025 May 26;17(11):1796. doi: 10.3390/nu17111796.
2
Social Media Influencers, Health Literacy, and Food Literacy: A Correlational Study Among Adolescents.社交媒体影响者、健康素养与食品素养:一项青少年相关性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 6;21(12):1629. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121629.
3
Adaptation and Validation of the S-NutLit Scale to Assess Nutritional Literacy in the Peruvian Population.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrition and food literacy among young Canadian adults living with type 1 diabetes.加拿大 1 型糖尿病青年成年人的营养与食品素养。
Diabet Med. 2022 Nov;39(11):e14921. doi: 10.1111/dme.14921. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
2
The Eating Motivations Scale (EATMOT): Development and Validation by Means of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM).饮食动机量表(EATMOT):通过验证性因素分析(CFA)和结构方程模型(SEM)进行开发与验证
Zdr Varst. 2020 Dec 31;60(1):4-9. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2021-0002. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Chi-square for model fit in confirmatory factor analysis.
适应和验证 S-NutLit 量表以评估秘鲁人群的营养素养。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 30;21(6):707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060707.
4
The Awareness of the Role of Commercial Determinants of Health and the Readiness to Accept Restrictions on Unhealthy Food Advertising in Polish Society.波兰社会对商业健康决定因素的认识和接受限制不健康食品广告的意愿。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 10;15(22):4743. doi: 10.3390/nu15224743.
5
Nutrition and Food Literacy: Framing the Challenges to Health Communication.营养与食品素养:健康传播面临的挑战。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 7;15(22):4708. doi: 10.3390/nu15224708.
6
Food Knowledge for Better Nutrition and Health: A Study among University Students in Portugal.增进营养与健康的食品知识:葡萄牙大学生的一项研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 30;11(11):1597. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111597.
7
Food Literacy Scale: Validation through Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis in a Sample of Portuguese University Students.食物素养量表:在葡萄牙大学生样本中通过探索性和验证性因子分析的验证。
Nutrients. 2022 Dec 29;15(1):166. doi: 10.3390/nu15010166.
8
Eating Choices-The Roles of Motivation and Health Literacy: A Cross-Sectional Study.饮食选择——动机和健康素养的作用:一项横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Sep 28;14(19):4026. doi: 10.3390/nu14194026.
验证性因素分析中模型拟合的卡方检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Sep;76(9):2209-2211. doi: 10.1111/jan.14399. Epub 2020 May 7.
4
Measuring Nutrition and Food Literacy in Adults: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Existing Measurement Tools.测量成年人的营养与食物素养:现有测量工具的系统评价与评估
Health Lit Res Pract. 2018 Aug 15;2(3):e134-e160. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20180625-01. eCollection 2018 Jul.
5
The influence of health literacy on the timely diagnosis of symptomatic cancer: A systematic review.健康素养对有症状癌症及时诊断的影响:一项系统综述。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 Jan;28(1):e12920. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12920. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
6
Three-Factor Structure of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Outpatients: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描门诊患者电子健康素养量表的三因素结构:验证性因素分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Feb 19;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.9039.
7
The Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument is a Valid and Reliable Measure of Nutrition Literacy in Adults with Chronic Disease.营养素养评估工具是一种在慢性病成人中评估营养素养的有效且可靠的方法。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Mar;50(3):247-257.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
8
A short food literacy questionnaire (SFLQ) for adults: Findings from a Swiss validation study.成人简短食品素养问卷(SFLQ):来自瑞士验证研究的结果。
Appetite. 2018 Jan 1;120:275-280. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
Identifying attributes of food literacy: a scoping review.识别食品素养属性:范围综述。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2406-2415. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001276. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Just a subtle difference? Findings from a systematic review on definitions of nutrition literacy and food literacy.只是一个细微的差别?关于营养素养和食物素养定义的系统评价结果
Health Promot Int. 2018 Jun 1;33(3):378-389. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw084.