• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Does Friend Support Matter? The Association between Gender Role Attitudes and School Bullying among Male Adolescents in China.朋友支持重要吗?中国男性青少年性别角色态度与校园欺凌之间的关联。
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;9(8):1139. doi: 10.3390/children9081139.
2
Perception of gender norms and its association with bullying behavior among adolescent students.青少年学生对性别规范的认知及其与欺凌行为的关联。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2024 Mar 11;99(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s42506-024-00151-1.
3
Bullying and Attitudes Toward Masculinity in Croatian Schools: Behavioral and Emotional Characteristics of Students Who Bully Others.克罗地亚学校的欺凌行为和对男子气概的态度:欺凌他人的学生的行为和情绪特征。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Apr;36(7-8):3496-3513. doi: 10.1177/0886260518777011. Epub 2018 May 20.
4
The Co-evolution of Bullying Perpetration, Homophobic Teasing, and a School Friendship Network.欺凌行为、恐同戏弄与学校友谊网络的共同演变。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Mar;47(3):601-618. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0783-4. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
5
Longitudinal Link Between Bullying Victimization and Bullying Perpetration: A Multilevel Moderation Analysis of Perceived School Climate.受欺凌经历与欺凌行为的纵向关联:感知学校氛围的多层次调节分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jul;37(13-14):NP12238-NP12259. doi: 10.1177/0886260521997940. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Self-reported Rates of Abuse, Neglect, and Bullying Experienced by Transgender and Gender-Nonbinary Adolescents in China.中国跨性别和非二元性别青少年自报告的虐待、忽视和欺凌发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911058. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11058.
7
Sex Differences in Traditional School Bullying Perpetration and Victimization among Adolescents: A Chain-Mediating Effect.青少年传统校园欺凌中性别差异的作用机制:链式中介效应。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159525.
8
Weight Status and School Bullying Experiences in Urban China: The Difference Between Boys and Girls.中国城市青少年的体重状况与校园欺凌经历:男孩与女孩的差异。
J Interpers Violence. 2020 Aug;35(15-16):2663-2686. doi: 10.1177/0886260519880170. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
9
Bullying and Suicide Ideation: Testing the Buffering Hypothesis of Social Support in a Sub-Saharan African Sample.欺凌与自杀意念:在撒哈拉以南非洲样本中检验社会支持的缓冲假说
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2019 Dec 6;14(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s40653-019-00294-w. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Latent profiles of bullying perpetration and victimization: Gender differences and family variables.受欺凌者和欺凌者的潜在特征:性别差异和家庭变量。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Mar;149:106682. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106682. Epub 2024 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between adolescent sleep duration and exposure to school bullying: the masking effect of depressive symptoms.青少年睡眠时间与遭受校园欺凌之间的关系:抑郁症状的掩盖效应。
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 16;15:1417960. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1417960. eCollection 2024.
2
A Cross-Sectional Survey of Different Types of School Bullying before and during COVID-19 in Shantou City, China.中国汕头市 COVID-19 前后不同类型校园欺凌的横断面调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 24;20(3):2103. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032103.

本文引用的文献

1
Social-Ecological Predictors of Homophobic Name-Calling Perpetration and Victimization Among Early Adolescents.青少年早期恐同辱骂行为及受害情况的社会生态预测因素
J Early Adolesc. 2022 Nov;42(9):1115-1151. doi: 10.1177/02724316211002271. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
2
Examining the Prevalence and Risk Factors of School Bullying Perpetration Among Chinese Children and Adolescents.探究中国儿童和青少年校园欺凌行为的发生率及风险因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 14;13:720149. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.720149. eCollection 2022.
3
Relationship between school bullying and mental health status of adolescent students in China: A nationwide cross-sectional study.中国青少年学生校园欺凌与心理健康状况的关系:一项全国性横断面研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Apr;70:103043. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103043. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
4
Mental Health, Bullying, and Victimization among Chinese Adolescents.中国青少年的心理健康、欺凌与受害情况
Children (Basel). 2022 Feb 11;9(2):240. doi: 10.3390/children9020240.
5
Structural family factors and bullying at school: a large scale investigation based on a Chinese adolescent sample.结构家庭因素与学校欺凌:基于中国青少年样本的大规模调查。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):2249. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12367-3.
6
The Association between Gender Role Attitudes and Alcohol Use among Early Adolescents in Shanghai, China.中国上海青少年早期的性别角色态度与饮酒行为之间的关系。
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(9):1403-1410. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1928214. Epub 2021 May 22.
7
Masculinities and violence: using latent class analysis to investigate the origins and correlates of differences between men in the cross-sectional UN Multi-country Study on men and violence in Asia and the Pacific.男性气质与暴力:使用潜在类别分析调查亚太地区男性和暴力的多国家横断面研究中男性之间差异的起源和相关性。
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020439. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020439.
8
A Systematic Review of Adolescent Masculinities and Associations with Internalizing Behavior Problems and Social Support.青少年男子气概与内化行为问题和社会支持的关联:系统综述
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;68(1-2):215-231. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12492. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
School Bullying Among Vocational School Students in China: Prevalence and Associations With Personal, Relational, and School Factors.中国职业学校学生中的校园欺凌:流行率及其与个人、关系和学校因素的关联。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jan;37(1-2):NP104-NP124. doi: 10.1177/0886260520907360. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Male Adolescents' Gender Attitudes and Violence: Implications for Youth Violence Prevention.男性青少年的性别态度与暴力:对青少年暴力预防的启示。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Mar;58(3):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Dec 27.

朋友支持重要吗?中国男性青少年性别角色态度与校园欺凌之间的关联。

Does Friend Support Matter? The Association between Gender Role Attitudes and School Bullying among Male Adolescents in China.

作者信息

Chen Binli, Wang Xiying, Gao Yutong

机构信息

School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

Institute for Education Theories, Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;9(8):1139. doi: 10.3390/children9081139.

DOI:10.3390/children9081139
PMID:36010030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9406991/
Abstract

This study investigated the association between gender role attitudes, perceived friend support, and school bullying among male adolescents from 11 schools in two cities in China. A total of 3172 Chinese adolescents between 12 and 20 years of age (48.80% girls and 51.20% boys) completed questionnaires that included measures of bullying, gender role attitudes, and perceived social support. In terms of outcome measures, the Chinese version of the Illinois Bully Scale (IBS), Attitudes toward Women Scale for Adolescents (AWSA), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were used to assess bullying perpetration, gender role attitudes, and perceived friend support, respectively. Based on masculinity theories and the stress-buffering theory, the study found that male adolescents held more traditional gender role attitudes (t = 30.78, p < 0.001) and reported higher prevalence of bullying behaviors (36.02%) than girls (31.20%). In addition, boys’ bullying behaviors were significantly predicted by gender role attitudes through perceived friend support. That is, male youth with more conservative gender role attitudes reported less perceived friend support (adjusted OR = 1.055; SE = 0.013), which elevated their risks of bullying perpetration (adjusted OR = 2.082; SE = 0.302). These findings have critical implications for bullying intervention and prevention through gender equity education.

摘要

本研究调查了中国两个城市11所学校的男性青少年的性别角色态度、感知到的朋友支持与校园欺凌之间的关联。共有3172名年龄在12至20岁之间的中国青少年(48.80%为女孩,51.20%为男孩)完成了问卷,问卷内容包括欺凌、性别角色态度和感知到的社会支持的测量。在结果测量方面,中文版的伊利诺伊欺凌量表(IBS)、青少年对女性态度量表(AWSA)和多维感知社会支持量表(MSPSS)分别用于评估欺凌行为、性别角色态度和感知到的朋友支持。基于男性气质理论和压力缓冲理论,研究发现男性青少年持有更传统的性别角色态度(t = 30.78,p < 0.001),且报告的欺凌行为发生率(36.02%)高于女孩(31.20%)。此外,通过感知到的朋友支持,性别角色态度对男孩的欺凌行为有显著预测作用。也就是说,性别角色态度更为保守的男性青少年感知到的朋友支持较少(调整后的OR = 1.055;SE = 0.013),这增加了他们实施欺凌行为的风险(调整后的OR = 2.082;SE = 0.302)。这些发现对于通过性别平等教育进行欺凌干预和预防具有关键意义。