• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

葡萄牙屈光不正的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Prevalence of refractive error in Portugal - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Clinical and Experimental Optometry Research Lab (CEORLab), Center of Physics - School of Sciences, University of Minho, Minho, Portugal.

出版信息

J Optom. 2023 Jul-Sep;16(3):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.optom.2022.07.003
PMID:36050229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10323180/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyse epidemiological data of refractive error prevalence in Portugal.

METHODS

A structured search strategy and systematic literature review was applied to multiple databases, such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, official organizations and academic repositorium's, to identify all relevant epidemiological studies in Portugal until February 2021. The outcome measure was the prevalence of refractive error among the Portuguese population. The events and sample size were entered as raw data and the effect size parameters were computed by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software.

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies were pooled for the meta-analysis. The fixed effects model points to an estimated effect size of 43% (95% CI: 41.9-44.1%). However, the statistics of heterogeneity (Q-value p < 0.001; I-squared =99.344) showed very high heterogeneity among studies and recommends using a random-effects model. The random effects model points to an estimated effect size of 31.9% (95% CI: 19.8-47.0%) prevalence of refractive error in the Portuguese population.

CONCLUSIONS

A prevalence of refractive error in Portugal of 31.9% (95% CI: 20.0-47.0%) can be considered as a conservative approach to the real burden of this condition. However, it translates into at least 2 to 4.5 million Portuguese individuals with a refractive error. The high heterogeneity between studies, the wide estimate and the random effects involved demonstrate the need for more studies and consistent sources to obtain narrower estimates.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在系统回顾和荟萃分析葡萄牙屈光不正患病率的流行病学数据。

方法

采用结构化搜索策略和系统文献回顾,对多个数据库(如 MEDLINE/PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Google Scholar、官方组织和学术资源库)进行检索,以确定截至 2021 年 2 月葡萄牙所有相关的流行病学研究。主要结局指标为葡萄牙人群中屈光不正的患病率。将事件和样本量作为原始数据输入,使用 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software 计算效应大小参数。

结果

共有 9 项研究纳入荟萃分析。固定效应模型估计的效应大小为 43%(95%CI:41.9-44.1%)。然而,异质性统计(Q 值 p<0.001;I-squared=99.344)表明研究之间存在高度异质性,建议使用随机效应模型。随机效应模型估计的屈光不正患病率为 31.9%(95%CI:19.8-47.0%)。

结论

葡萄牙屈光不正的患病率为 31.9%(95%CI:20.0-47.0%),这可以被认为是对该疾病真实负担的保守估计。然而,这意味着至少有 200 万到 450 万葡萄牙人患有屈光不正。研究之间存在高度异质性、广泛的估计值和随机效应表明,需要进行更多的研究和采用一致的来源,以获得更窄的估计值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9747/10323180/4ac46e5a95ff/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9747/10323180/cdceb11a7b5a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9747/10323180/4ac46e5a95ff/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9747/10323180/cdceb11a7b5a/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9747/10323180/4ac46e5a95ff/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence of refractive error in Portugal - A systematic review and meta-analysis.葡萄牙屈光不正的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Optom. 2023 Jul-Sep;16(3):182-188. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Prevalence of visual impairment due to refractive error among children and adolescents in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚儿童和青少年因屈光不正导致的视力障碍患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0271313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271313. eCollection 2022.
4
The prevalence of refractive errors in the Middle East: a systematic review and meta-analysis.中东地区屈光不正的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Ophthalmol. 2020 Jun;40(6):1571-1586. doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01316-5. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
5
Prevalence of refractive errors in Nepalese children and adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis.尼泊尔儿童和成人屈光不正的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Optom. 2023 Mar;106(2):119-132. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2022.2153582. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
6
Phakic intraocular lenses for the treatment of refractive errors: an evidence-based analysis.用于治疗屈光不正的有晶状体眼人工晶状体:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(14):1-120. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
7
Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium.欧洲屈光不正患病率:欧洲眼流行病学(E(3))联盟
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;30(4):305-15. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
8
Prevalence of refractive error in Portugal estimated from ophthalmic lens manufacturing data: Ten-years analysis.葡萄牙眼科镜片制造数据估计的屈光不正患病率:十年分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 21;18(4):e0284703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284703. eCollection 2023.
9
Prevalence of refractive errors, uncorrected refractive error, and presbyopia in adults in India: A systematic review.印度成年人屈光不正、未矫正屈光不正和老视的患病率:系统评价。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 May;67(5):583-592. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1235_18.
10
Strabismus, visual acuity, and uncorrected refractive error in portuguese children aged 6 to 11 years.6至11岁葡萄牙儿童的斜视、视力及未矫正屈光不正情况
Strabismus. 2014 Sep;22(3):115-9. doi: 10.3109/09273972.2014.932395. Epub 2014 Jul 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of refractive errors among school students in Iraq - A systematic review and meta-analysis.伊拉克在校学生屈光不正的患病率——一项系统综述与荟萃分析
J Optom. 2025 Jan-Mar;18(1):100534. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2024.100534. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
Factors associated with myopia in the Portuguese child population: An epidemiological study.葡萄牙儿童群体中与近视相关的因素:一项流行病学研究。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 Mar;45(2):542-549. doi: 10.1111/opo.13429. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
3
Integration of Refractive Services Provided by Optometrists into the Portuguese National Health Service.

本文引用的文献

1
Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.2020 年失明和视力障碍的原因及 30 多年来的趋势,以及与 VISION 2020:看见的权利相关的可避免盲的患病率:全球疾病负担研究的分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Feb;9(2):e144-e160. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30489-7. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
2
Post-COVID-19 and the Portuguese national eye care system challenge.新冠疫情后与葡萄牙国家眼科护理系统面临的挑战。
J Optom. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):257-261. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 11.
3
验光师提供的屈光服务纳入葡萄牙国家医疗服务体系。
Port J Public Health. 2023 Sep 1;41(2):111-121. doi: 10.1159/000530060. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Prevalence of refractive error in Portugal estimated from ophthalmic lens manufacturing data: Ten-years analysis.葡萄牙眼科镜片制造数据估计的屈光不正患病率:十年分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 21;18(4):e0284703. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284703. eCollection 2023.
Global Vision Impairment and Blindness Due to Uncorrected Refractive Error, 1990-2010.
1990 - 2010年因未矫正屈光不正导致的全球视力损害和失明情况
Optom Vis Sci. 2016 Mar;93(3):227-34. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000796.
4
Prevalence of refractive error in Europe: the European Eye Epidemiology (E(3)) Consortium.欧洲屈光不正患病率:欧洲眼流行病学(E(3))联盟
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Apr;30(4):305-15. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0010-0. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
5
Strabismus, visual acuity, and uncorrected refractive error in portuguese children aged 6 to 11 years.6至11岁葡萄牙儿童的斜视、视力及未矫正屈光不正情况
Strabismus. 2014 Sep;22(3):115-9. doi: 10.3109/09273972.2014.932395. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
Prevalence and causes of vision loss in high-income countries and in Eastern and Central Europe: 1990-2010.高收入国家以及东欧和中欧地区视力丧失的患病率及原因:1990 - 2010年
Br J Ophthalmol. 2014 May;98(5):629-38. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304033. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目:PRISMA声明
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
8
A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析的重新评估。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):137-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x.
9
Contribution of refractive errors to visual impairment in patients at korle-bu teaching hospital.屈光不正对科勒-布教学医院患者视力损害的影响
Ghana Med J. 2007 Jun;41(2):68-71. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v41i2.55304.
10
Refractive, biometric and topographic changes among Portuguese university science students: a 3-year longitudinal study.葡萄牙大学生的屈光、生物测量和地形变化:一项为期3年的纵向研究。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007 May;27(3):287-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00475.x.