van Ham Willem B, Kessler Elise L, Oerlemans Marish I F J, Handoko M Louis, Sluijter Joost P G, van Veen Toon A B, den Ruijter Hester M, de Jager Saskia C A
Department of Medical Physiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Laboratory for Experimental Cardiology, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2022 May 25;7(8):844-857. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.12.009. eCollection 2022 Aug.
At least one-half of the growing heart failure population consists of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The limited therapeutic options, the complexity of the syndrome, and many related comorbidities emphasize the need for adequate experimental animal models to study the etiology of HFpEF, as well as its comorbidities and pathophysiological changes. The strengths and weaknesses of available animal models have been reviewed extensively with the general consensus that a "1-size-fits-all" model does not exist, because no uniform HFpEF patient exists. In fact, HFpEF patients have been categorized into HFpEF phenogroups based on comorbidities and symptoms. In this review, we therefore study which animal model is best suited to study the different phenogroups-to improve model selection and refinement of animal research. Based on the published data, we extrapolated human HFpEF phenogroups into 3 animal phenogroups (containing small and large animals) based on reports and definitions of the authors: animal models with high (cardiac) age (phenogroup aging); animal models focusing on hypertension and kidney dysfunction (phenogroup hypertension/kidney failure); and models with hypertension, obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (phenogroup cardiometabolic syndrome). We subsequently evaluated characteristics of HFpEF, such as left ventricular diastolic dysfunction parameters, systemic inflammation, cardiac fibrosis, and sex-specificity in the different models. Finally, we scored these parameters concluded how to best apply these models. Based on our findings, we propose an easy-to-use classification for future animal research based on clinical phenogroups of interest.
在不断增加的心力衰竭患者群体中,至少有一半是射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)。治疗选择有限、综合征的复杂性以及许多相关合并症凸显了需要合适的实验动物模型来研究HFpEF的病因及其合并症和病理生理变化。现有动物模型的优缺点已被广泛综述,普遍共识是不存在“一刀切”的模型,因为不存在统一的HFpEF患者。事实上,HFpEF患者已根据合并症和症状被分类为HFpEF表型组。因此,在本综述中,我们研究哪种动物模型最适合研究不同的表型组,以改进模型选择并优化动物研究。基于已发表的数据,我们根据作者的报告和定义将人类HFpEF表型组外推为3种动物表型组(包括小型和大型动物):高(心脏)龄动物模型(衰老表型组);关注高血压和肾功能不全的动物模型(高血压/肾衰竭表型组);以及患有高血压、肥胖和2型糖尿病的模型(心脏代谢综合征表型组)。我们随后评估了不同模型中HFpEF的特征,如左心室舒张功能障碍参数、全身炎症、心脏纤维化和性别特异性。最后,我们对这些参数进行评分并得出如何最佳应用这些模型的结论。基于我们的研究结果,我们为未来基于感兴趣的临床表型组的动物研究提出了一种易于使用的分类方法。