• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恩格列净、氯沙坦及其联合治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的降压作用机制:一项随机交叉试验的二次分析。

Mechanisms underlying the blood pressure-lowering effects of empagliflozin, losartan and their combination in people with type 2 diabetes: A secondary analysis of a randomized crossover trial.

机构信息

Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jan;25(1):198-207. doi: 10.1111/dom.14864. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1111/dom.14864
PMID:36089810
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10087931/
Abstract

AIM

To study the effects of the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor empagliflozin, the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) losartan, and their combination on blood pressure, while studying the mechanisms potentially involved.

METHODS

A total of 24 people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (age: 66 ± 6 years; body mass index: 31.0 ± 3 kg/m ; estimated glomerular filtration rate: 90 ml/min/1.73m ) received a 1-week treatment with empagliflozin 10 mg once daily, losartan 50 mg once daily, their combination, and placebo, in a randomized double-blind crossover design, with 4-week washout periods in between. Blood pressure, arterial stiffness, autonomic nervous system activity and plasma volume, extracellular fluid and serum albumin were assessed.

RESULTS

Versus placebo (139 mmHg), empagliflozin reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 8 mmHg (P = .001), losartan by 12 mmHg (P = .001) and empagliflozin + losartan by 15 mmHg (P < .001). Combination therapy had a larger SBP-lowering effect versus empagliflozin monotherapy (-7 [95% CI -12; -2] mmHg) and numerically larger effects versus losartan monotherapy (-3 [-8; 2] mmHg). Empagliflozin reduced sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activity, arterial stiffness and extracellular fluid, while increasing serum albumin. Losartan reduced SNS activity and arterial stiffness. Combination therapy induced volume contraction variables, together with a reduction in SNS activity and arterial stiffness.

CONCLUSION

In people with T2D, SGLT2 inhibition in combination with an ARB had a larger blood pressure-lowering effect versus placebo than either of the drugs alone. Our data further suggest that the mechanisms underlying these blood pressure reductions at least partially differ between these agents.

摘要

目的

研究钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂恩格列净、血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)氯沙坦及其联合应用对血压的影响,并探讨可能涉及的机制。

方法

共纳入 24 例 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者(年龄:66±6 岁;体重指数:31.0±3kg/m2;估算肾小球滤过率:90ml/min/1.73m2),采用随机、双盲、交叉设计,在 1 周内分别接受恩格列净 10mg 每日 1 次、氯沙坦 50mg 每日 1 次、二者联合应用和安慰剂治疗,每个治疗周期之间有 4 周洗脱期。评估血压、动脉僵硬度、自主神经系统活动和血浆容量、细胞外液和血清白蛋白。

结果

与安慰剂(139mmHg)相比,恩格列净降低收缩压(SBP)8mmHg(P=0.001),氯沙坦降低 12mmHg(P=0.001),恩格列净联合氯沙坦降低 15mmHg(P<0.001)。与恩格列净单药治疗相比(-7[95%CI-12;-2]mmHg),联合治疗的 SBP 降低效果更大,与氯沙坦单药治疗相比(-3[-8;2]mmHg),联合治疗的效果也更大。恩格列净降低交感神经系统(SNS)活性、动脉僵硬度和细胞外液,增加血清白蛋白。氯沙坦降低 SNS 活性和动脉僵硬度。联合治疗诱导容量收缩变量,同时降低 SNS 活性和动脉僵硬度。

结论

在 T2D 患者中,与安慰剂相比,SGLT2 抑制剂联合 ARB 治疗的降压效果优于两种药物单独治疗。我们的数据进一步表明,这些药物降压作用的机制至少部分不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498a/10087931/04b0ba720144/DOM-25-198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498a/10087931/04b0ba720144/DOM-25-198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/498a/10087931/04b0ba720144/DOM-25-198-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanisms underlying the blood pressure-lowering effects of empagliflozin, losartan and their combination in people with type 2 diabetes: A secondary analysis of a randomized crossover trial.恩格列净、氯沙坦及其联合治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的降压作用机制:一项随机交叉试验的二次分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jan;25(1):198-207. doi: 10.1111/dom.14864. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
How does empagliflozin improve arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus? Sub analysis of a clinical trial.恩格列净如何改善 2 型糖尿病患者的动脉僵硬度?临床试验的亚组分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Mar 29;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0839-8.
3
Renal and Vascular Effects of Combined SGLT2 and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition.联合 SGLT2 和血管紧张素转换酶抑制的肾脏和血管作用。
Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):450-462. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059150. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
4
Mechanisms underlying the blood pressure lowering effects of dapagliflozin, exenatide, and their combination in people with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of a randomized trial.达格列净、艾塞那肽及其联合应用在 2 型糖尿病患者中降压作用的机制:一项随机试验的二次分析。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Apr 28;21(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01492-x.
5
Angiotensin receptor antagonist vs. angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in Asian subjects with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria - a randomized crossover study.血管紧张素受体拮抗剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在亚洲2型糖尿病合并蛋白尿患者中的比较——一项随机交叉研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007 Jul;9(4):477-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00623.x.
6
Rationale and design of a multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin on endothelial function: the EMBLEM trial.一项评估恩格列净对内皮功能影响的多中心安慰剂对照双盲随机试验的原理与设计:EMBLEM试验
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Apr 12;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0532-8.
7
Pooled analysis of Phase III trials indicate contrasting influences of renal function on blood pressure, body weight, and HbA1c reductions with empagliflozin.汇总分析 III 期临床试验表明,恩格列净对肾功能、血压、体重和 HbA1c 降低的影响存在差异。
Kidney Int. 2018 Jan;93(1):231-244. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.017. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
Placebo effect and efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension not controlled with lisinopril or losartan: a phase IV, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.安慰剂效应及比索洛尔在未被依那普利或氯沙坦控制的高血压患者中的疗效:一项 IV 期、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Apr;13(2):129-40. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0010-y.
9
Effects of empagliflozin on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes.恩格列净对2型糖尿病患者血压、动脉僵硬度标志物及血管阻力的影响。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Dec;17(12):1180-93. doi: 10.1111/dom.12572. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Impact of Empagliflozin on Blood Pressure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension by Background Antihypertensive Medication.恩格列净对使用背景降压药物的2型糖尿病合并高血压患者血压的影响
Hypertension. 2016 Dec;68(6):1355-1364. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07703. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Pyridoxamine does not reduce arterial stiffness in an 8-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled intervention trial with abdominally obese individuals.在一项针对腹部肥胖个体的为期8周的随机双盲安慰剂对照干预试验中,吡哆胺并未降低动脉僵硬度。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Sep;27(9):5332-5336. doi: 10.1111/dom.16524. Epub 2025 Jun 13.
2
The systemic and kidney hemodynamic response to empagliflozin, losartan and their combination varies between individuals.恩格列净、氯沙坦及其联合用药对全身和肾脏血流动力学的反应存在个体差异。
J Nephrol. 2025 Apr 12. doi: 10.1007/s40620-025-02289-3.
3
Critical Analysis of the Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Renal Tubular Sodium, Water and Chloride Homeostasis and Their Role in Influencing Heart Failure Outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and renin-angiotensin system blockers in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.2型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与肾素-血管紧张素系统阻滞剂联合治疗的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Mar 25;37(4):720-729. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab048.
2
Natriuretic Effect of Two Weeks of Dapagliflozin Treatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Preserved Kidney Function During Standardized Sodium Intake: Results of the DAPASALT Trial.在标准钠摄入下,两周达格列净治疗对保留肾功能的 2 型糖尿病患者的利钠作用:DAPASALT 试验结果。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Feb;44(2):440-447. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2604. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
3
SGLT2 抑制剂对肾小管钠、水和氯稳态的影响及其影响心力衰竭结局的作用的批判性分析。
Circulation. 2023 Jul 25;148(4):354-372. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064346. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
4
Canagliflozin Ameliorates Oxidative Stress and Autistic-like Features in Valproic-Acid-Induced Autism in Rats: Comparison with Aripiprazole Action.卡格列净改善丙戊酸诱导的大鼠自闭症中的氧化应激和类自闭症特征:与阿立哌唑作用的比较。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 May 19;16(5):769. doi: 10.3390/ph16050769.
A Practical Guide to Resonance Frequency Assessment for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback.心率变异性生物反馈共振频率评估实用指南。
Front Neurosci. 2020 Oct 8;14:570400. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.570400. eCollection 2020.
4
Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.达格列净治疗慢性肾脏病患者。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1436-1446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
5
Cardiovascular Outcomes with Ertugliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes.在 2 型糖尿病患者中使用依格列净的心血管结局。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1425-1435. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004967. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
6
Mechanisms of Cardiovascular Benefits of Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors: A State-of-the-Art Review.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂心血管获益机制:最新综述
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Jun 22;5(6):632-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.004. eCollection 2020 Jun.
7
Effects of dapagliflozin and gliclazide on the cardiorenal axis in people with type 2 diabetes.达格列净和格列齐特对 2 型糖尿病患者心肾轴的影响。
J Hypertens. 2020 Sep;38(9):1811-1819. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002480.
8
Control of 24-hour blood pressure with SGLT2 inhibitors to prevent cardiovascular disease.用 SGLT2 抑制剂控制 24 小时血压以预防心血管疾病。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 May-Jun;63(3):249-262. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
Mechanisms of Cardiorenal Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂的心脏肾脏作用机制:美国心脏病学会临床心脏病学杂志最新观点述评。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Feb 4;75(4):422-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.031.
10
The renal hemodynamic effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin are caused by post-glomerular vasodilatation rather than pre-glomerular vasoconstriction in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes in the randomized, double-blind RED trial.在 RED 随机、双盲试验中,二甲双胍治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中,SGLT2 抑制剂达格列净的肾脏血流动力学效应是由肾小球后血管舒张引起的,而不是由肾小球前血管收缩引起的。
Kidney Int. 2020 Jan;97(1):202-212. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Oct 10.