• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2000年至2019年美国九种自然灾害的频率、强度和空间模式的观测变化。

Observed Changes in the Frequency, Intensity, and Spatial Patterns of Nine Natural Hazards in the United States from 2000 to 2019.

作者信息

Summers J K, Lamper A, McMillion C, Harwell L C

机构信息

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Measurements and Modeling, Gulf Breeze, FL 32561, USA.

出版信息

Sustainability. 2022 Mar 31;14(7):1-23. doi: 10.3390/su14074158.

DOI:10.3390/su14074158
PMID:36090804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9461684/
Abstract

There is increasing evidence from across the globe that climate change results in changes in the frequency, location, and impact of natural hazards. Much of this evidence is conceptual, inferential, or simply assumed. To provide objective support to confirm these hypotheses, we constructed county-level time-series datasets (2000-2019) for nine natural hazards for the entire United States. Hazards considered for this study included hurricanes, tropical storms, landslides, wildfires, earthquakes, drought, inland flooding, coastal flooding, and tornadoes. Geospatial analysis techniques were used to calculate the percentage (range: 0-100) of land area in each county exposed to each natural hazard for all the years that hazard data were available. The best available data were acquired from publicly accessible sources. Cumulative distribution functions were calculated for each hazard in five-year intervals to test for statistically significant changes in distribution patterns across the five-year time periods using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. There were significant changes in hurricanes, tropical storms, and drought over the two decades; changes in tornadoes, landslides, and wildfires were not significant in terms of frequency, likely due to the site-specific nature of their occurrences. The intensity and spatial distribution and an emerging hot spot and spatial trend analyses and an emerging hot spot and spatial trend analyses were also completed (except for flooding events and earthquakes due to insufficient data). All datasets provide empirical support for earlier inferences concerning the connections between the hazards and climate change. Analyses showed apparent changes in the frequency and intensity of hurricanes, tropical storms, and drought-related to climate change factors. Internal and coastal flooding also demonstrated these connections, although the length of the dataset did not permit significant testing but shows significant hot spots and trending locations. Tornadoes, landslides, and wildfires showed significant hot spots and trending locations, but the specific locational nature of the data did not show significant changes in frequency. Earthquakes showed no significant changes over the time period.

摘要

全球范围内越来越多的证据表明,气候变化导致自然灾害的频率、地点和影响发生变化。这些证据大多是概念性的、推断性的,或者仅仅是假设的。为了提供客观支持以证实这些假设,我们构建了美国全境九个自然灾害的县级时间序列数据集(2000 - 2019年)。本研究考虑的灾害包括飓风、热带风暴、山体滑坡、野火、地震、干旱、内陆洪水、沿海洪水和龙卷风。利用地理空间分析技术计算了在有灾害数据的所有年份里,每个县遭受每种自然灾害的土地面积百分比(范围:0 - 100)。可获取的最佳数据来自公开可用的来源。以五年为间隔计算每种灾害的累积分布函数,使用柯尔莫哥洛夫 - 斯米尔诺夫检验来检验五年时间段内分布模式的统计显著变化。在这二十年中,飓风、热带风暴和干旱发生了显著变化;龙卷风、山体滑坡和野火在频率方面的变化不显著,可能是由于其发生具有特定地点的性质。还完成了强度和空间分布以及新兴热点和空间趋势分析(由于数据不足,洪水事件和地震除外)。所有数据集都为早期关于灾害与气候变化之间联系的推断提供了实证支持。分析表明,与气候变化因素相关的飓风、热带风暴和干旱的频率和强度发生了明显变化。内陆和沿海洪水也显示出这些联系,尽管数据集的长度不允许进行显著检验,但显示出显著的热点和趋势位置。龙卷风、山体滑坡和野火显示出显著的热点和趋势位置,但数据的特定位置性质并未显示频率有显著变化。在该时间段内,地震没有显著变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/efb51746babe/nihms-1831416-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/56ea3d5ec3d9/nihms-1831416-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/d5cfe7fb667f/nihms-1831416-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/ceccd3ea0569/nihms-1831416-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/aa41943936f9/nihms-1831416-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/131bd71aefc4/nihms-1831416-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/1717c4a3b8ea/nihms-1831416-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/e759aa5019f3/nihms-1831416-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/494d0c5ac7cc/nihms-1831416-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/119c87776c84/nihms-1831416-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/0de8a45828b4/nihms-1831416-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/f1268723d27f/nihms-1831416-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/efb51746babe/nihms-1831416-f0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/56ea3d5ec3d9/nihms-1831416-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/d5cfe7fb667f/nihms-1831416-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/ceccd3ea0569/nihms-1831416-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/aa41943936f9/nihms-1831416-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/131bd71aefc4/nihms-1831416-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/1717c4a3b8ea/nihms-1831416-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/e759aa5019f3/nihms-1831416-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/494d0c5ac7cc/nihms-1831416-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/119c87776c84/nihms-1831416-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/0de8a45828b4/nihms-1831416-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/f1268723d27f/nihms-1831416-f0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4e7/9461684/efb51746babe/nihms-1831416-f0012.jpg

相似文献

1
Observed Changes in the Frequency, Intensity, and Spatial Patterns of Nine Natural Hazards in the United States from 2000 to 2019.2000年至2019年美国九种自然灾害的频率、强度和空间模式的观测变化。
Sustainability. 2022 Mar 31;14(7):1-23. doi: 10.3390/su14074158.
2
Geospatial indicators of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity to assess neighbourhood variation in vulnerability to climate change-related health hazards.评估邻里对气候变化相关健康危害脆弱性的暴露、敏感性和适应能力的地理空间指标。
Environ Health. 2021 Mar 22;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00708-z.
3
Measuring Community Resilience to Natural Hazards: The Natural Hazard Resilience Screening Index (NaHRSI)-Development and Application to the United States.衡量社区对自然灾害的恢复力:自然灾害恢复力筛选指数(NaHRSI)——在美国的开发与应用
Geohealth. 2018 Dec 7;2(12):372-394. doi: 10.1029/2018GH000160. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
The Role of Extreme Weather and Climate-Related Events on Asthma Outcomes.极端天气及与气候相关事件对哮喘转归的作用
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2021 Feb;41(1):73-84. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Influence of exposure to climate-related hazards in the phenotypic expression of primary Sjögren's syndrome.暴露于与气候相关的危害对原发性干燥综合征表型表达的影响。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023 Dec;41(12):2437-2447. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/pmbay6. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Winter storm Uri and temporary drought relief in the western climate divisions of Texas.冬季风暴“乌里”和德克萨斯西部气候分区的临时旱情缓解。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 20;835:155336. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155336. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
7
Observational Verification of the Cumulative Resilience Screening Index (CRSI) Using Hurricanes, Inland Floods, and Wildfires From 2016 to 2019.使用2016年至2019年的飓风、内陆洪水和野火对累积复原力筛查指数(CRSI)进行的观测验证
Geohealth. 2022 Oct 1;6(10):e2022GH000660. doi: 10.1029/2022GH000660. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Assessing community vulnerability to floods and hurricanes along the Gulf Coast of the United States.评估美国墨西哥湾沿岸社区对洪水和飓风的脆弱性。
Disasters. 2020 Jul;44(3):518-547. doi: 10.1111/disa.12383. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
10
Projecting Age-Stratified Risk of Exposure to Inland Flooding and Wildfire Smoke in the United States under Two Climate Scenarios.在两种气候情景下预测美国内陆洪水和野火烟雾的分层风险。
Environ Health Perspect. 2018 Apr 17;126(4):047007. doi: 10.1289/EHP2594.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Existing Indicators to Bridge the Exposure Data Gap: A Novel Natural Hazard Assessment.利用现有指标填补暴露数据缺口:一种新型自然灾害评估
Sustainability. 2024 Dec 9;16(23):10778. doi: 10.3390/su162310778.
2
Observational Verification of the Cumulative Resilience Screening Index (CRSI) Using Hurricanes, Inland Floods, and Wildfires From 2016 to 2019.使用2016年至2019年的飓风、内陆洪水和野火对累积复原力筛查指数(CRSI)进行的观测验证
Geohealth. 2022 Oct 1;6(10):e2022GH000660. doi: 10.1029/2022GH000660. eCollection 2022 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Wildfires, Global Climate Change, and Human Health.野火、全球气候变化与人类健康。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 26;383(22):2173-2181. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2028985. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
2
Measuring Community Resilience to Natural Hazards: The Natural Hazard Resilience Screening Index (NaHRSI)-Development and Application to the United States.衡量社区对自然灾害的恢复力:自然灾害恢复力筛选指数(NaHRSI)——在美国的开发与应用
Geohealth. 2018 Dec 7;2(12):372-394. doi: 10.1029/2018GH000160. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Conceptualizing Holistic Community Resilience to Climate Events: Foundation for a Climate Resilience Screening Index.
构建社区应对气候事件的整体复原力概念:气候复原力筛查指数的基础
Geohealth. 2017 Jun 1;1(4):151-164. doi: 10.1002/2016GH000047.
4
Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests.人为气候变化对美国西部森林野火的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 18;113(42):11770-11775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1607171113. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
5
A review of the relationships between drought and forest fire in the United States.美国干旱与森林火灾关系综述。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2353-69. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13275. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
6
Increased variability of tornado occurrence in the United States.美国龙卷风发生频次的变异性增加。
Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):349-52. doi: 10.1126/science.1257460.
7
Climate change, flooding and the media in Britain.气候变化、洪水和英国媒体。
Public Underst Sci. 2011 May;20(3):422-38. doi: 10.1177/0963662509353377.
8
Modeled impact of anthropogenic warming on the frequency of intense Atlantic hurricanes.人为变暖对强烈大西洋飓风频率的影响模型。
Science. 2010 Jan 22;327(5964):454-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1180568.
9
Flooding in the future--predicting climate change, risks and responses in urban areas.未来的洪水——预测城市地区的气候变化、风险及应对措施
Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(5):265-73.