Kelly Sherrie L, Le Rutte Epke A, Richter Maximilian, Penny Melissa A, Shattock Andrew J
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Oct;11(5):2045-2061. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00683-z. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
Vaccinations have reduced severe burden of COVID-19 and allowed for lifting of non-pharmaceutical interventions. However, with immunity waning alongside emergence of more transmissible variants of concern, vaccination strategies must be examined.
Here we apply a SARS-CoV-2 transmission model to identify preferred frequency, timing, and target groups for vaccine boosters to reduce public health burden and health systems risk. We estimated new infections and hospital admissions averted over 2 years through annual or biannual boosting of those eligible (those who received doses one and two) who are (1) most vulnerable (60+ or living with comorbidities) or (2) those 5+, at universal (98% of eligible) or lower coverage (85% of those 50+ or with comorbidities and 50% of 5-49 year olds) representing moderate vaccine fatigue and/or hesitancy. We simulated three emerging variant scenarios: (1) no new variants; (2) 25% more infectious and immune-evading Omicron-level severity variants emerge annually and become dominant; (3) emerge biannually. We further explored the impact of varying seasonality, variant immune-evading capacity, infectivity, severity, timing, and vaccine infection blocking assumptions.
To reduce COVID-19-related hospitalisations over the next 2 years, boosters should be provided for all those eligible annually 3-4 months ahead of peak winter whether or not new variants of concern emerge. Only boosting those most vulnerable is unlikely to ensure reduced stress on health systems. Moreover, boosting all eligible better protects those most vulnerable than only boosting the vulnerable group. Conversely, while this strategy may not ensure reduced stress on health systems, as an indication of cost-effectiveness, per booster dose more hospitalisations could be averted through annual boosting of those most vulnerable versus all eligible, since those most vulnerable are more likely to seek hospital care once infected, whereas increasing to biannual boosting showed diminishing returns. Results were robust when key model parameters were varied. However, we found that the more frequently variants emerge, the less the effect boosters will have, regardless of whether administered annually or biannually.
Delivering well-timed annual COVID-19 vaccine boosters to all those eligible, prioritising those most vulnerable, can reduce infections and hospital admissions. Findings provide model-based evidence for decision-makers to plan for administering COVID-19 boosters ahead of winter 2022-2023 to help mitigate the health burden and health system stress.
疫苗接种减轻了新冠病毒病(COVID-19)的严重负担,并使得非药物干预措施得以解除。然而,随着免疫力下降以及更具传播性的变异株出现,必须审视疫苗接种策略。
在此,我们应用一种严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)传播模型,以确定疫苗加强针的最佳接种频率、时间和目标群体,从而减轻公共卫生负担和卫生系统风险。我们估计了在2年时间内,通过对符合条件者(即接种过一剂和两剂疫苗者)进行年度或半年一次的加强接种,避免的新感染病例数和住院病例数。这些符合条件者包括:(1)最脆弱人群(60岁及以上或患有合并症者);(2)5岁及以上人群,接种覆盖率分别为普遍覆盖率(符合条件者的98%)或较低覆盖率(50岁及以上或患有合并症者的85%以及5至49岁者的50%),这代表了一定程度的疫苗接种疲劳和/或犹豫情绪。我们模拟了三种新出现变异株的情景:(1)无新变异株出现;(2)每年出现传染性增加25%且具有免疫逃逸能力、奥密克戎级别的严重变异株,并成为主导毒株;(3)每半年出现一次。我们还进一步探讨了不同季节性、变异株免疫逃逸能力、传染性、严重程度、接种时间以及疫苗感染阻断假设的影响。
为在未来2年内减少与COVID-19相关的住院病例,无论是否出现新的变异株,都应在冬季高峰前3至4个月,每年为所有符合条件者提供加强针。仅对最脆弱人群进行加强接种不太可能确保减轻卫生系统的压力。此外,对所有符合条件者进行加强接种,比对仅对脆弱人群进行加强接种能更好地保护最脆弱人群。相反,虽然这一策略可能无法确保减轻卫生系统的压力,但作为成本效益的一种体现,通过每年对最脆弱人群而非所有符合条件者进行加强接种,每剂加强针可避免更多的住院病例,因为最脆弱人群一旦感染更有可能寻求住院治疗,而改为半年一次的加强接种则效果递减。当关键模型参数变化时,结果依然稳健。然而,我们发现变异株出现得越频繁,加强针的效果就越小,无论加强接种是每年进行还是每半年进行一次。
及时为所有符合条件者提供年度COVID-19疫苗加强针,并优先考虑最脆弱人群,可减少感染和住院病例。研究结果为决策者在2022 - 2023年冬季之前规划COVID-19加强针接种提供了基于模型的证据,以帮助减轻健康负担和卫生系统压力。