IMBIV-CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Puerto Madryn, Argentina.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 12;17(9):e0274481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274481. eCollection 2022.
The Patagonian steppe is a refuge for several indigenous peoples who live in relatively isolated communities, depending heavily on natural resources for their activities, health, and food security. The local ecological knowledge is a reservoir that generates full wellbeing and for which it must be the object of protection and local development. In this study, we aimed to find which factors can influence local ecological knowledge from a metacommunity on the Patagonian steppe. We analyzed variation in knowledge about cultivated and gathered plants used as medicinal, edible, and firewood according to multiple factors widely discussed in the ethnobiological literature: age, gender, formal education, occupation, indigenous identity, contact with urban centers, use of biomedicine, hunting, and handcrafted textile production. We conducted semi-structured interviews with local experts, accessed by the snowball technique. We found that formal education is a key factor in the variation of local ecological knowledge among people. In addition, we found that knowledge varies between people who practice activities inside and outside the home, concentrating knowledge between cultivated and gathered plants, respectively. Our urbanization proxies did not point to an influence of this factor on local knowledge, but specialists living in a larger community with signs of internal urbanization processes had much less knowledge. Our results allowed us to visualize the importance of studying metacommunities as a whole, to verify complexities and intersections of overlapping factors. Studies in metacommunities open up a range of possibilities for ethnobiological analysis.
巴塔哥尼亚草原是几个原住民的避难所,他们生活在相对孤立的社区中,其活动、健康和粮食安全严重依赖自然资源。当地的生态知识是一种产生全面福祉的资源,必须对其进行保护和地方发展。在这项研究中,我们旨在寻找哪些因素可以从巴塔哥尼亚草原的一个元社区影响当地的生态知识。我们根据广泛讨论的多种因素分析了用于药用、食用和薪材的栽培和采集植物的知识变化:年龄、性别、正规教育、职业、原住民身份、与城市中心的接触、生物医学的使用、狩猎和手工纺织生产。我们通过滚雪球技术对当地专家进行了半结构化访谈。我们发现正规教育是造成人们之间当地生态知识差异的关键因素。此外,我们发现,在从事家庭内外活动的人群之间,知识存在差异,分别集中在栽培植物和采集植物上。我们的城市化代表并没有指出这个因素对当地知识的影响,但生活在具有内部城市化进程迹象的更大社区中的专家知识要少得多。我们的结果使我们能够看到整体研究元社区的重要性,以验证重叠因素的复杂性和交叉点。元社区的研究为民族生物学分析开辟了一系列可能性。