School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Int J Psychol. 2023 Feb;58(1):16-29. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12877. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
Although abortion and euthanasia are highly contested issues at the heart of the culture war, the moral foundations underlying ideological differences on these issues are mostly unknown. Given that much of the extant debate is framed around the sanctity of life, we argued that the moral foundation of purity/sanctity-a core moral belief that emphasises adherence to the "natural order"-would mediate the negative relationship between conservatism and support for abortion and euthanasia. As hypothesised, results from a nation-wide random sample of adults in New Zealand (N = 3360) revealed that purity/sanctity mediated the relationship between conservatism and opposition to both policies. These results demonstrate that, rather than being motivated by a desire to reduce harm, conservative opposition to pro-choice and end-of-life decisions is (partly) based on the view that ending a life, even if it is one's own, violates God's natural design and, thus, stains one's spiritual purity.
虽然堕胎和安乐死是处于文化战争核心的极具争议性问题,但在这些问题上,意识形态分歧的道德基础在很大程度上是未知的。鉴于现存的大部分争论都是围绕生命的神圣性展开的,我们认为,纯洁/神圣的道德基础——一种强调遵守“自然秩序”的核心道德信仰——将调解保守主义与对堕胎和安乐死支持之间的负相关关系。正如假设的那样,来自新西兰全国成年人的随机样本(N=3360)的结果表明,纯洁/神圣性调解了保守主义与反对这两种政策之间的关系。这些结果表明,保守派反对选择和生命终结的决定(部分)不是基于减少伤害的愿望,而是基于这样一种观点,即结束生命,即使是自己的生命,也违反了上帝的自然设计,从而玷污了一个人的精神纯洁。