Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Sep 21;22(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05044-9.
Language supported group antenatal care (gANC) for Somali-born women was implemented in a Swedish public ANC clinic. The women were offered seven 60-min sessions, facilitated by midwives and starting with a presentation of a selected topic, with an additional 15-min individual appointment before or after. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility for participants and midwives of implementing The Hooyo ("mother" in Somali) gANC intervention, including implementation, mechanisms of impact and contextual factors.
A process evaluation was performed, using The Medical Research Council (MRC) guidelines for evaluating complex interventions as a framework. A range of qualitative and quantitative data sources were used including observations (n = 9), complementary, in-depth and key-informant interviews (women n = 6, midwives n = 4, interpreters and research assistants n = 3) and questionnaire data (women n = 44; midwives n = 8).
Language-supported gANC offered more comprehensive ANC that seemed to correspond to existing needs of the participants and could address knowledge gaps related to pregnancy, birth and the Swedish health care system. The majority of women thought listening to other pregnant women was valuable (91%), felt comfortable in the group (98%) and supported by the other women (79%), and they said that gANC suited them (79%). The intervention seemed to enhance knowledge and cultural understanding among midwives, thus contributing to more women-centred care. The intervention was not successful at involving partners in ANC.
The Hooyo gANC intervention was acceptable to the Somali women and to midwives, but did not lead to greater participation by fathers-to-be. The main mechanisms of impact were more comprehensive ANC and enhanced mutual cultural understanding. The position of women was strengthened in the groups, and the way in which the midwives expanded their understanding of the participants and their narratives was promising. To be feasible at a large scale, gANC might require further adaptations and the "othering" of women in risk groups should be avoided.
The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03879200).
为了支持索马里出生的女性,在瑞典的一家公共产前诊所实施了语言支持的群体产前护理(gANC)。该服务为女性提供了七次 60 分钟的课程,由助产士主持,从一个选定主题的演讲开始,并在之前或之后额外提供 15 分钟的个人预约。本研究的目的是评估参与者和助产士实施“Hooyo”(索马里语中“母亲”的意思)gANC 干预措施的可行性,包括实施、影响机制和背景因素。
采用医学研究委员会(MRC)评估复杂干预措施的指南作为框架进行了过程评估。使用了一系列定性和定量数据来源,包括观察(n=9)、补充、深入和关键信息提供者访谈(女性 n=6,助产士 n=4,口译员和研究助理 n=3)和问卷调查数据(女性 n=44;助产士 n=8)。
语言支持的 gANC 提供了更全面的 ANC,似乎符合参与者的现有需求,并可以解决与怀孕、分娩和瑞典医疗保健系统相关的知识差距。大多数女性认为听取其他孕妇的意见很有价值(91%),在小组中感到舒适(98%)并得到其他女性的支持(79%),并且她们表示 gANC 适合她们(79%)。该干预措施似乎增强了助产士的知识和文化理解,从而促进了更以妇女为中心的护理。该干预措施未能成功地让准爸爸参与 ANC。
“Hooyo”gANC 干预措施对索马里妇女和助产士来说是可以接受的,但并没有导致更多的准爸爸参与。主要的影响机制是更全面的 ANC 和增强的相互文化理解。妇女在小组中的地位得到了加强,助产士扩大对参与者及其叙述理解的方式很有前途。为了在更大规模上可行,gANC 可能需要进一步的调整,并避免将处于风险中的妇女“他者化”。
该研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(标识符:NCT03879200)。