Department of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:975638. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.975638. eCollection 2022.
In health and physical activity promotion, there is growing interest in co-creation approaches that involve researchers and non-academic stakeholders in developing new interventions. Previous research has shown the promising results of cooperative planning as a co-creation approach in building new capacities and implementing physical activity-promoting interventions in nursing care and automotive mechatronics. However, it remains unclear whether (1) cooperative planning for physical activity promotion can be successfully transferred to other settings in the nursing care and automotive mechatronic sectors and (2) what key factors influence its success or failure.
We conducted a multiple case study in three settings in the nursing care and automotive mechatronics sectors. Following a mixed methods approach, we collected, analyzed, and triangulated data from documents ( = 17), questionnaires ( = 66), and interviews ( = 6). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and through using nonparametric analyses of variance; qualitative data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis by extraction.
The transfer of cooperative planning to new settings was realized, though the impact varied by setting. While the interventions were developed and implemented in nursing care settings, interventions were developed but not implemented in the automotive mechatronics setting. In this context, intervention implementation was influenced by 11 key factors: , and . Furthermore, the transfer of cooperative planning was influenced by different activity characteristics, namely , and .
The present article contributes to a better understanding of a co-creation approach utilized for physical activity promotion and provides new insights into (1) the transferability of cooperative planning and (2) the associated key factors influencing intervention implementation. The success of cooperative planning varied by setting and was influenced by several activity characteristics and key factors, some of which showed complex relationships. This raises the question of whether some settings might benefit more from a co-creation approach than others. Therefore, future co-creation initiatives should carefully consider the specific characteristics of a setting to select and apply the most appropriate approach.
在健康和身体活动促进领域，人们越来越关注涉及研究人员和非学术利益相关者的共同创作方法，以开发新的干预措施。先前的研究表明，合作规划作为一种共同创作方法，在培养新能力和在护理和汽车机电一体化中实施促进身体活动的干预措施方面具有广阔的前景。然而，目前尚不清楚（1）促进身体活动的合作规划是否可以成功地应用于护理和汽车机电一体化领域的其他环境，以及（2）哪些关键因素会影响其成败。
我们在护理和汽车机电一体化领域的三个环境中进行了一项多案例研究。我们采用混合方法，从文件（= 17）、问卷调查（= 66）和访谈（= 6）中收集、分析和三角验证数据。定量数据采用描述性和非参数方差分析进行分析；定性数据采用提取的定性内容分析进行分析。
合作规划转移到新环境中是可行的，但影响因环境而异。虽然干预措施在护理环境中得到了制定和实施，但在汽车机电一体化环境中仅进行了制定而未实施。在这种情况下，干预措施的实施受到 11 个关键因素的影响：，。此外，合作规划的转移受到不同活动特征的影响，即，。
本文有助于更好地理解用于促进身体活动的共同创作方法，并为（1）合作规划的可转移性和（2）影响干预措施实施的相关关键因素提供了新的见解。合作规划的成功因环境而异，并受到几个活动特征和关键因素的影响，其中一些因素表现出复杂的关系。这就提出了一个问题，即某些环境是否比其他环境更受益于共同创作方法。因此，未来的共同创作举措应仔细考虑环境的具体特征，以选择和应用最合适的方法。
