Carver Charles S, Johnson Sheri L
Sungchoon Sinclair University of Miami, Coral Gables.
J Res Pers. 2010 Dec;44(6):698-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.09.004.
This study examines the relationships of trait-like tendencies towards authentic and hubristic pride (Tracy & Robins, 2004) with goal-regulation tendencies, affective tendencies, and impulsive traits. Undergraduates (n = 936) completed the 14-item measure of authentic and hubristic pride (Tracy & Robins, 2007b) and a battery of other self-report measures. The two types of pride correlated with distinct profiles of goal regulation tendencies, affective tendencies, and self-control. Authentic pride correlated with measures of self-control, whereas hubristic pride was related to measures of impulsivity and aggression. Overall, the differential pattern of correlations fits with a model in which authentic pride is tied to adaptive achievement and goal engagement, whereas hubristic pride is tied to extrinsic values of public recognition and social dominance.
本研究考察了真实自豪和自大自豪的特质类倾向(特雷西和罗宾斯,2004)与目标调节倾向、情感倾向和冲动特质之间的关系。本科生(n = 936)完成了14项真实自豪和自大自豪的测量(特雷西和罗宾斯,2007b)以及一系列其他自我报告测量。两种类型的自豪与目标调节倾向、情感倾向和自我控制的不同特征相关。真实自豪与自我控制的测量相关,而自大自豪与冲动性和攻击性的测量相关。总体而言,相关的差异模式符合一个模型,即真实自豪与适应性成就和目标投入相关,而自大自豪与公众认可和社会支配的外在价值相关。