Department of Sociology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America.
Aging Studies Institute, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275466. eCollection 2022.
The rise in working-age mortality rates in the United States in recent decades largely reflects stalled declines in cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality alongside rising mortality from alcohol-induced causes, suicide, and drug poisoning; and it has been especially severe in some U.S. states. Building on recent work, this study examined whether U.S. state policy contexts may be a central explanation. We modeled the associations between working-age mortality rates and state policies during 1999 to 2019. We used annual data from the 1999-2019 National Vital Statistics System to calculate state-level age-adjusted mortality rates for deaths from all causes and from CVD, alcohol-induced causes, suicide, and drug poisoning among adults ages 25-64 years. We merged that data with annual state-level data on eight policy domains, such as labor and taxes, where each domain was scored on a 0-1 conservative-to-liberal continuum. Results show that the policy domains were associated with working-age mortality. More conservative marijuana policies and more liberal policies on the environment, gun safety, labor, economic taxes, and tobacco taxes in a state were associated with lower mortality in that state. Especially strong associations were observed between certain domains and specific causes of death: between the gun safety domain and suicide mortality among men, between the labor domain and alcohol-induced mortality, and between both the economic tax and tobacco tax domains and CVD mortality. Simulations indicate that changing all policy domains in all states to a fully liberal orientation might have saved 171,030 lives in 2019, while changing them to a fully conservative orientation might have cost 217,635 lives.
近年来,美国工作年龄人群死亡率的上升在很大程度上反映了心血管疾病 (CVD) 死亡率的下降停滞,同时酒精相关原因、自杀和药物中毒导致的死亡率上升;而且这种情况在美国的一些州尤为严重。本研究基于最近的研究,探讨了美国州政策环境是否是一个核心解释因素。我们构建了工作年龄死亡率与 1999 年至 2019 年期间各州政策之间的关联模型。我们使用了 1999 年至 2019 年全国生命统计系统的年度数据,计算了各州 25-64 岁成年人所有原因、CVD、酒精相关原因、自杀和药物中毒导致的死亡率,这些死亡率经过了年龄调整。我们将这些数据与每年关于八个政策领域的州一级数据进行了合并,例如劳动和税收,每个领域都按照从保守到自由的 0-1 连续体进行评分。结果表明,政策领域与工作年龄人群的死亡率有关。一个州的大麻政策越保守、环境、枪支安全、劳动、经济税收和烟草税收政策越自由,该州的死亡率就越低。在某些特定领域和特定死因之间观察到了特别强烈的关联:枪支安全领域与男性自杀死亡率之间,劳动领域与酒精相关死亡率之间,以及经济税收和烟草税收领域与 CVD 死亡率之间。模拟表明,将所有州的所有政策领域都改为完全自由的方向,可能会在 2019 年挽救 171030 条生命,而将它们改为完全保守的方向可能会导致 217635 人死亡。