Suppr超能文献

美国中年成年人的州政策背景与身体健康

U.S. State Policy Contexts and Physical Health among Midlife Adults.

作者信息

Kemp Blakelee, Grumbach Jacob M, Montez Jennifer Karas

机构信息

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Socius. 2022 Jan-Dec;8. doi: 10.1177/23780231221091324. Epub 2022 Apr 24.

Abstract

This study examines how state policy contexts may have contributed to unfavorable adult health in recent decades. It merges individual-level data from the 1993-2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n=2,166,835) with 15 state-level policy domains measured annually on a conservative to liberal continuum. We examined associations between policy domains and health among adults ages 45-64 years and assess how much of the associations is accounted by adults' socioeconomic, behavioral/lifestyle, and family factors. A more liberal version of the civil rights domain was associated with better health. It was disproportionately important for less-educated adults and women, and its association with adult health was partly accounted by educational attainment, employment, and income. Environment, gun safety, and marijuana policy domains were, to a lesser degree, predictors of health in some model specifications. In sum, health improvements require a greater focus on macro-level factors that shape the conditions in which people live.

摘要

本研究探讨了近几十年来州政策环境可能如何导致成年人健康状况不佳。它将1993 - 2016年行为风险因素监测系统的个体层面数据(n = 2,166,835)与每年在保守到自由连续体上衡量的15个州层面政策领域相结合。我们研究了45 - 64岁成年人中政策领域与健康之间的关联,并评估这些关联中有多少可由成年人的社会经济、行为/生活方式和家庭因素来解释。民权领域更自由的版本与更好的健康状况相关。这对受教育程度较低的成年人和女性尤为重要,其与成年人健康的关联部分可由教育程度、就业和收入来解释。在某些模型设定中,环境、枪支安全和大麻政策领域在较小程度上是健康的预测因素。总之,改善健康需要更关注塑造人们生活条件的宏观层面因素。

相似文献

2
US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy.美国的州政策、政治与预期寿命
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):668-699. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12469. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
3
U.S. state policy contexts and mortality of working-age adults.美国州政策环境与工作年龄成年人死亡率。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275466. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

9
US State Policy Contexts and Population Health.美国的州政策背景与人口健康。
Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):196-223. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12617.

本文引用的文献

3
US State Polarization, Policymaking Power, and Population Health.美国的政治极化、政策制定权与人口健康。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1033-1052. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12482. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy.美国的州政策、政治与预期寿命
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):668-699. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12469. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
8
Scaling up: The politics of health and place.扩大规模:卫生与地方政治。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.036. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Association Between State Minimum Wages and Suicide Rates in the U.S.美国各州最低工资与自杀率的关联
Am J Prev Med. 2019 May;56(5):648-654. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验