• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内生菌和根际细菌对葡萄树干病原菌的抗真菌活性评估

Evaluation of the Antifungal Activity of Endophytic and Rhizospheric Bacteria against Grapevine Trunk Pathogens.

作者信息

Bustamante Marcelo I, Elfar Karina, Eskalen Akif

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.

出版信息

Microorganisms. 2022 Oct 14;10(10):2035. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102035.

DOI:10.3390/microorganisms10102035
PMID:36296311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9611468/
Abstract

Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are caused by multiple unrelated fungal pathogens, and their management remains difficult worldwide. Biocontrol is an attractive and sustainable strategy given the current need for a cleaner viticulture. In this study, twenty commercial vineyards were sampled across California to isolate endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria from different grapevine cultivars with the presence and absence of GTD symptoms. A collection of 1344 bacterial isolates were challenged in vitro against and , from which a subset of 172 isolates exerted inhibition levels of mycelial growth over 40%. Bacterial isolates were identified as ( 154), spp. ( 12), ( 2) and others that were later excluded ( 4). Representative isolates of , and were challenged against six other fungal pathogens responsible for GTDs. Mycelial inhibition levels were consistent across bacterial species, being slightly higher against slow-growing fungi than against Botryosphaeriaceae. Moreover, agar-diffusible metabolites of strongly inhibited the growth of and , at 1, 15, and 30% /. The agar-diffusible metabolites of and , however, caused lower inhibition levels against both pathogens, but their volatile organic compounds showed antifungal activity against both pathogens. These results suggest that , and constitute potential biocontrol agents (BCAs) against GTDs and their application in field conditions should be further evaluated.

摘要

葡萄树干病害(GTDs)由多种不相关的真菌病原体引起,在全球范围内其防治仍然困难。鉴于当前对更清洁葡萄栽培的需求,生物防治是一种有吸引力且可持续的策略。在本研究中,对加利福尼亚州的20个商业葡萄园进行了采样,以从有和没有GTD症状的不同葡萄品种中分离内生细菌和根际细菌。对1344株细菌分离株进行了体外抗 和 的测试,其中172株分离株对菌丝体生长的抑制水平超过40%。细菌分离株被鉴定为 (154株)、 属(12株)、 (2株)以及其他后来被排除的菌株(4株)。 、 和 的代表性分离株对其他六种导致GTDs的真菌病原体进行了测试。不同细菌物种的菌丝体抑制水平一致,对生长缓慢的真菌的抑制作用略高于对葡萄座腔菌科真菌的抑制作用。此外, 的琼脂可扩散代谢产物在1%、15%和30% 时强烈抑制 和 的生长。然而, 和 的琼脂可扩散代谢产物对两种病原体的抑制水平较低,但它们的挥发性有机化合物对两种病原体均表现出抗真菌活性。这些结果表明, 、 和 构成了针对GTDs的潜在生物防治剂(BCAs),应进一步评估它们在田间条件下的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/dc53a5a5b850/microorganisms-10-02035-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/01e0f675dd36/microorganisms-10-02035-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/115b348b4bd9/microorganisms-10-02035-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/b7dc1a0a9a7b/microorganisms-10-02035-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/f2fb1f549c0c/microorganisms-10-02035-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/d69ad928f84e/microorganisms-10-02035-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/612de51105d2/microorganisms-10-02035-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/339861dd3fd9/microorganisms-10-02035-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/dc53a5a5b850/microorganisms-10-02035-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/01e0f675dd36/microorganisms-10-02035-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/115b348b4bd9/microorganisms-10-02035-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/b7dc1a0a9a7b/microorganisms-10-02035-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/f2fb1f549c0c/microorganisms-10-02035-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/d69ad928f84e/microorganisms-10-02035-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/612de51105d2/microorganisms-10-02035-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/339861dd3fd9/microorganisms-10-02035-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a489/9611468/dc53a5a5b850/microorganisms-10-02035-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Antifungal Activity of Endophytic and Rhizospheric Bacteria against Grapevine Trunk Pathogens.内生菌和根际细菌对葡萄树干病原菌的抗真菌活性评估
Microorganisms. 2022 Oct 14;10(10):2035. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102035.
2
Evaluation of Some Endophytic to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens.某些内生菌对葡萄及葡萄树真菌病原体潜在抑制作用的评估。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;12(13):2553. doi: 10.3390/plants12132553.
3
Biocontrol Potential of Grapevine Endophytic and Rhizospheric Fungi Against Trunk Pathogens.葡萄内生真菌和根际真菌对树干病原菌的生物防治潜力
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 7;11:614620. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.614620. eCollection 2020.
4
Diversity Profiling of Grapevine Microbial Endosphere and Antagonistic Potential of Endophytic Against Grapevine Trunk Diseases.葡萄微生物内生菌的多样性分析及内生菌对葡萄树干病害的拮抗潜力
Front Microbiol. 2020 Mar 26;11:477. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00477. eCollection 2020.
5
Biocontrol Activity of Species Isolated from Grapevines in British Columbia against Botryosphaeria Dieback Fungal Pathogens.从不列颠哥伦比亚省葡萄藤中分离出的物种对葡萄座腔菌枝干溃疡病真菌病原体的生物防治活性。
J Fungi (Basel). 2022 Apr 16;8(4):409. doi: 10.3390/jof8040409.
6
Use of Endophytic and Rhizosphere Actinobacteria from Grapevine Plants To Reduce Nursery Fungal Graft Infections That Lead to Young Grapevine Decline.利用葡萄植株内生和根际放线菌减少导致幼龄葡萄树衰退的苗圃真菌嫁接感染。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Dec 1;83(24). doi: 10.1128/AEM.01564-17. Print 2017 Dec 15.
7
Diversity and Bioactivity of Endophytic Actinobacteria Associated with Grapevines.与葡萄藤共生的内生放线菌的多样性和生物活性。
Curr Microbiol. 2022 Nov 3;79(12):390. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-03068-0.
8
Biocontrol of almond canker diseases caused by Botryosphaeriaceae fungi.防控由葡萄座腔菌真菌引起的杏仁溃疡病。
Pest Manag Sci. 2024 Apr;80(4):1839-1848. doi: 10.1002/ps.7919. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
9
Antifungal Agents Based on Chitosan Oligomers, ε-polylysine and spp. Secondary Metabolites against Three Botryosphaeriaceae Species.基于壳寡糖、ε-聚赖氨酸和 spp. 次级代谢产物的抗真菌剂对三种葡萄座腔菌科物种的作用
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Jul 20;8(3):99. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030099.
10
Endophytic Fungi as Potential Biological Control Agents against Grapevine Trunk Diseases in Alentejo Region.内生真菌作为阿连特茹地区葡萄树干病害的潜在生物防治剂
Biology (Basel). 2020 Nov 26;9(12):420. doi: 10.3390/biology9120420.

引用本文的文献

1
Probiotic potential and antimicrobial efficacy of a dairy isolate, Enterococcus faecium MBBL3.粪肠球菌MBBL3——一种乳制品分离株的益生菌潜力及抗菌功效
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025 Aug 1;109(1):176. doi: 10.1007/s00253-025-13558-3.
2
Native Bacteria Are Effective Biocontrol Agents at a Wide Range of Temperatures of , Associated with Botryosphaeria Dieback on Grapevine.本地细菌在与葡萄藤上葡萄座腔菌属溃疡病相关的广泛温度范围内是有效的生物防治剂。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Mar 27;14(7):1043. doi: 10.3390/plants14071043.
3
Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 21: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
The microbiota of the grapevine holobiont: A key component of plant health.葡萄植物整体微生物组:植物健康的关键组成部分。
J Adv Res. 2022 Sep;40:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
2
The Grapevine Microbiome to the Rescue: Implications for the Biocontrol of Trunk Diseases.葡萄藤微生物组来帮忙:对树干病害生物防治的启示
Plants (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;11(7):840. doi: 10.3390/plants11070840.
3
Grapevine wood microbiome analysis identifies key fungal pathogens and potential interactions with the bacterial community implicated in grapevine trunk disease appearance.
向欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)通报的有意添加到食品或饲料中的合格安全推定(QPS)推荐微生物制剂清单更新:截至2024年9月向EFSA通报的分类单元的适用性。
EFSA J. 2025 Jan 20;23(1):e9169. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9169. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
The Hidden World within Plants 2.0.植物内部的隐秘世界2.0
Microorganisms. 2023 Dec 1;11(12):2903. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11122903.
5
Whole-genome sequence of strain R22 isolated from rhizosphere in Bulgaria.从保加利亚根际分离出的R22菌株的全基因组序列。
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2023 Dec 14;12(12):e0069323. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00693-23. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
6
MALDI mass spectrometry-based identification of antifungal molecules from endophytic strains with biocontrol potential of , a grapevine trunk pathogen in Peru.基于基质辅助激光解吸电离质谱法从具有生物防治潜力的内生菌株中鉴定抗真菌分子,该内生菌株对秘鲁葡萄树干病原体[具体病原体名称缺失]具有生物防治潜力 。
Curr Res Microb Sci. 2023 Sep 9;5:100201. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2023.100201. eCollection 2023.
7
New Potential Biological Limiters of the Main Esca-Associated Fungi in Grapevine.葡萄藤中主要黑腐病菌相关真菌的新潜在生物限制因素
Microorganisms. 2023 Aug 17;11(8):2099. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11082099.
8
Evaluation of Some Endophytic to Potentially Inhibit Grape and Grapevine Fungal Pathogens.某些内生菌对葡萄及葡萄树真菌病原体潜在抑制作用的评估。
Plants (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;12(13):2553. doi: 10.3390/plants12132553.
9
Microbial Biological Control of Fungi Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases: A Review of Strain Diversity, Modes of Action, and Advantages and Limits of Current Strategies.葡萄树干病害相关真菌的微生物生物防治:菌株多样性、作用方式及当前策略的优势与局限综述
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 May 31;9(6):638. doi: 10.3390/jof9060638.
葡萄藤木材微生物群落分析确定了关键真菌病原体以及与葡萄树干病害出现所涉及的细菌群落的潜在相互作用。
Environ Microbiome. 2021 Dec 4;16(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40793-021-00390-1.
4
Antifungal Activity of CE 100 against Anthracnose Disease () and Growth Promotion of Walnut ( L.) Trees.CE100 对炭疽病的抗真菌活性及其对核桃(L.)树生长的促进作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Sep 28;22(19):10438. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910438.
5
Pseudomonas chlororaphis metabolites as biocontrol promoters of plant health and improved crop yield.铜绿假单胞菌代谢产物作为植物健康和提高作物产量的生物防治促进剂。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021 May 12;37(6):99. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03063-w.
6
Natural combinatorial genetics and prolific polyamine production enable siderophore diversification in Serratia plymuthica.天然组合遗传学和多胺的大量生产使粘质沙雷氏菌中铁载体多样化。
BMC Biol. 2021 Mar 15;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-00971-z.
7
Elicitors of Plant Immunity Triggered by Beneficial Bacteria.有益细菌触发的植物免疫激发子
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 9;11:594530. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.594530. eCollection 2020.
8
Field evaluation of biocontrol agents against black-foot and Petri diseases of grapevine.田间评价生物防治剂对葡萄黑胫病和佩特利病的防治效果。
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Feb;77(2):697-708. doi: 10.1002/ps.6064. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Evaluating the combined effect of a systemic phenylpyrrole fungicide and the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Paraburkholderia phytofirmans (strain PsJN::gfp2x) against the grapevine trunk pathogen Neofusicoccum parvum.评价一种系统苯基吡咯类杀菌剂与促生根际细菌 Paraburkholderia phytofirmans(PsJN::gfp2x 菌株)联合防治葡萄蔓枯病菌 Neofusicoccum parvum 的效果。
Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Nov;76(11):3838-3848. doi: 10.1002/ps.5935. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Diversity Profiling of Grapevine Microbial Endosphere and Antagonistic Potential of Endophytic Against Grapevine Trunk Diseases.葡萄微生物内生菌的多样性分析及内生菌对葡萄树干病害的拮抗潜力
Front Microbiol. 2020 Mar 26;11:477. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00477. eCollection 2020.