The Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology & Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, School of Life Sciences and Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; Joint UNIversities Pandemic and Epidemiological Research, https://maths.org/juniper/.
J Theor Biol. 2023 Jan 21;557:111331. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111331. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 saw severe detriments to public health being inflicted by COVID-19 disease throughout 2020. In the lead up to Christmas 2020, the UK Government sought an easement of social restrictions that would permit spending time with others over the Christmas period, whilst limiting the risk of spreading SARS-CoV-2. In November 2020, plans were published to allow individuals to socialise within 'Christmas bubbles' with friends and family. This policy involved a planned easing of restrictions in England between 23-27 December 2020, with Christmas bubbles allowing people from up to three households to meet throughout the holiday period. We estimated the epidemiological impact of both this and alternative bubble strategies that allowed extending contacts beyond the immediate household. We used a stochastic individual-based model for a synthetic population of 100,000 households, with demographic and SARS-CoV-2 epidemiological characteristics comparable to England as of November 2020. We evaluated five Christmas bubble scenarios for the period 23-27 December 2020, assuming our populations of households did not have symptomatic infection present and were not in isolation as the eased social restrictions began. Assessment comprised incidence and cumulative infection metrics. We tested the sensitivity of the results to a situation where it was possible for households to be in isolation at the beginning of the Christmas bubble period and also when there was lower adherence to testing, contact tracing and isolation interventions. We found that visiting family and friends over the holiday period for a shorter duration and in smaller groups was less risky than spending the entire five days together. The increases in infection from greater amounts of social mixing disproportionately impacted the eldest. We provide this account as an illustration of a real-time contribution of modelling insights to a scientific advisory group, the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Operational sub-group (SPI-M-O) for the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) in the UK, during the COVID-19 pandemic. This manuscript was submitted as part of a theme issue on "Modelling COVID-19 and Preparedness for Future Pandemics".
SARS-CoV-2 的出现导致 2020 年 COVID-19 疾病严重危害公众健康。在 2020 年圣诞节前夕,英国政府寻求放宽社会限制,允许人们在圣诞节期间与他人共度时光,同时限制 SARS-CoV-2 的传播风险。2020 年 11 月,发布了计划允许个人在与朋友和家人的“圣诞泡泡”中进行社交。该政策涉及 2020 年 12 月 23 日至 27 日期间在英格兰放宽限制的计划,圣诞泡泡允许来自最多三个家庭的人在整个假期期间见面。我们估计了这一政策以及允许扩大与直系亲属以外的接触的替代泡泡策略的流行病学影响。我们使用了一个基于随机个体的模型,该模型适用于一个由 100000 个家庭组成的综合人群,其人口统计学和 SARS-CoV-2 流行病学特征与 2020 年 11 月的英格兰相似。我们评估了 2020 年 12 月 23 日至 27 日期间的五个圣诞泡泡方案,假设我们的家庭人群中没有出现症状性感染,并且在放宽社会限制开始时没有隔离。评估包括发病率和累积感染指标。我们测试了结果的敏感性,即家庭在圣诞泡泡期间开始时可能处于隔离状态的情况,以及测试、接触者追踪和隔离干预措施的依从性较低的情况。我们发现,在假期期间与家人和朋友短暂而小范围地聚会比连续五天在一起的风险要小。更多社交聚会带来的感染增加不成比例地影响到年龄最大的人。我们提供此说明是为了说明在 COVID-19 大流行期间,建模见解实时为建模科学专家组,即英国科学咨询小组紧急情况科学咨询组 (SAGE) 的科学大流行性流感建模、运作分组 (SPI-M-O) 做出贡献。本文作为关于“建模 COVID-19 和为未来大流行做准备”主题问题的一部分提交。