• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AutoScore-Ordinal:一种可解释的机器学习框架,用于生成有序结局的评分模型。

AutoScore-Ordinal: an interpretable machine learning framework for generating scoring models for ordinal outcomes.

机构信息

Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01770-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-022-01770-y
PMID:36333672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9636613/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk prediction models are useful tools in clinical decision-making which help with risk stratification and resource allocations and may lead to a better health care for patients. AutoScore is a machine learning-based automatic clinical score generator for binary outcomes. This study aims to expand the AutoScore framework to provide a tool for interpretable risk prediction for ordinal outcomes.

METHODS

The AutoScore-Ordinal framework is generated using the same 6 modules of the original AutoScore algorithm including variable ranking, variable transformation, score derivation (from proportional odds models), model selection, score fine-tuning, and model evaluation. To illustrate the AutoScore-Ordinal performance, the method was conducted on electronic health records data from the emergency department at Singapore General Hospital over 2008 to 2017. The model was trained on 70% of the data, validated on 10% and tested on the remaining 20%.

RESULTS

This study included 445,989 inpatient cases, where the distribution of the ordinal outcome was 80.7% alive without 30-day readmission, 12.5% alive with 30-day readmission, and 6.8% died inpatient or by day 30 post discharge. Two point-based risk prediction models were developed using two sets of 8 predictor variables identified by the flexible variable selection procedure. The two models indicated reasonably good performance measured by mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.758 and 0.793) and generalized c-index (0.737 and 0.760), which were comparable to alternative models.

CONCLUSION

AutoScore-Ordinal provides an automated and easy-to-use framework for development and validation of risk prediction models for ordinal outcomes, which can systematically identify potential predictors from high-dimensional data.

摘要

背景

风险预测模型是临床决策中的有用工具,有助于风险分层和资源分配,并可能为患者提供更好的医疗保健。AutoScore 是一种基于机器学习的二进制结果自动临床评分生成器。本研究旨在扩展 AutoScore 框架,为有序结果提供可解释的风险预测工具。

方法

使用原始 AutoScore 算法的 6 个模块生成 AutoScore-Ordinal 框架,包括变量排名、变量转换、评分推导(来自比例优势模型)、模型选择、评分微调以及模型评估。为了说明 AutoScore-Ordinal 的性能,该方法在 2008 年至 2017 年期间使用新加坡综合医院急诊科的电子健康记录数据进行。该模型在 70%的数据上进行训练,在 10%的数据上进行验证,在其余 20%的数据上进行测试。

结果

本研究包括 445,989 例住院患者,其中有序结果的分布为 80.7%无 30 天再入院存活,12.5%存活且 30 天内再入院,6.8%住院或出院后第 30 天内死亡。使用灵活变量选择过程确定的两组 8 个预测变量开发了两个基于两点的风险预测模型。这两个模型的表现相当不错,衡量指标为平均接收者操作特征曲线下面积(0.758 和 0.793)和广义 c 指数(0.737 和 0.760),与替代模型相当。

结论

AutoScore-Ordinal 为有序结果的风险预测模型的开发和验证提供了一个自动化且易于使用的框架,可以系统地从高维数据中识别潜在的预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/67cccb7ac3f4/12874_2022_1770_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/65fdad9b38b2/12874_2022_1770_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/3f188c165a3f/12874_2022_1770_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/af2cf575ec19/12874_2022_1770_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/67cccb7ac3f4/12874_2022_1770_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/65fdad9b38b2/12874_2022_1770_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/3f188c165a3f/12874_2022_1770_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/af2cf575ec19/12874_2022_1770_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/860a/9636613/67cccb7ac3f4/12874_2022_1770_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
AutoScore-Ordinal: an interpretable machine learning framework for generating scoring models for ordinal outcomes.AutoScore-Ordinal:一种可解释的机器学习框架,用于生成有序结局的评分模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01770-y.
2
AutoScore: A Machine Learning-Based Automatic Clinical Score Generator and Its Application to Mortality Prediction Using Electronic Health Records.自动评分:一种基于机器学习的自动临床评分生成器及其在使用电子健康记录进行死亡率预测中的应用。
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Oct 21;8(10):e21798. doi: 10.2196/21798.
3
AutoScore-Imbalance: An interpretable machine learning tool for development of clinical scores with rare events data.AutoScore-Imbalance:一种具有罕见事件数据的临床评分开发的可解释机器学习工具。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 May;129:104072. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104072. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
4
AutoScore-Survival: Developing interpretable machine learning-based time-to-event scores with right-censored survival data.AutoScore-Survival:利用右删失生存数据开发可解释的基于机器学习的生存事件评分模型。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Jan;125:103959. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103959. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
5
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning scoring tool for estimating time to emergency readmissions.用于估计急诊再入院时间的可解释机器学习评分工具的开发与验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Mar 6;45:101315. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101315. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Development and validation of the SARICA score to predict survival after return of spontaneous circulation in out of hospital cardiac arrest using an interpretable machine learning framework.使用可解释机器学习框架开发和验证 SARICA 评分,以预测院外心脏骤停自主循环恢复后的生存率。
Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.029. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
7
Leveraging Large-Scale Electronic Health Records and Interpretable Machine Learning for Clinical Decision Making at the Emergency Department: Protocol for System Development and Validation.利用大规模电子健康记录和可解释机器学习进行急诊科临床决策:系统开发与验证方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 25;11(3):e34201. doi: 10.2196/34201.
8
A universal AutoScore framework to develop interpretable scoring systems for predicting common types of clinical outcomes.一个用于开发可解释评分系统以预测常见类型临床结果的通用自动评分框架。
STAR Protoc. 2023 May 12;4(2):102302. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102302.
9
Effect of a Real-Time Risk Score on 30-day Readmission Reduction in Singapore.新加坡实时风险评分对 30 天再入院率降低的影响。
Appl Clin Inform. 2021 Mar;12(2):372-382. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726422. Epub 2021 May 19.
10
Development and Assessment of an Interpretable Machine Learning Triage Tool for Estimating Mortality After Emergency Admissions.开发和评估一种可解释的机器学习分诊工具,用于估算急诊入院后的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2118467. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18467.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a predictive model to forecast the cerebrovascular risk burden in older people using the NACC and ROSMAP dataset.使用NACC和ROSMAP数据集开发并验证预测老年人脑血管风险负担的预测模型。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Aug;21(8):e70543. doi: 10.1002/alz.70543.
2
Assessing the experience and attitude of emergency medical services staff toward linguistic diversity challenges in a Middle Eastern pre-hospital emergency care environment using machine learning analysis methods.运用机器学习分析方法评估中东院前急救环境中紧急医疗服务人员对语言多样性挑战的经验和态度。
Qatar Med J. 2025 Mar 3;2025(1):19. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2025.19. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a machine learning-based risk prediction model for cerebral infarction and comparison with nomogram model.基于机器学习的脑梗死风险预测模型的建立及与列线图模型的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Oct 1;314:341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.045. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
2
Machine Learning Risk Prediction Model of 90-day Mortality After Gastrectomy for Cancer.胃癌术后 90 天死亡率的机器学习风险预测模型。
Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):776-783. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005616. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
3
Development and validation of an interpretable prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (P-ROSC) score for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using machine learning: A retrospective study.
LC risk score - development and evaluation of a scale for assessing the risk of developing long COVID.
长新冠风险评分——一种评估发生长新冠风险的量表的开发与评估
Arch Med Sci. 2024 Apr 21;21(1):121-130. doi: 10.5114/aoms/187781. eCollection 2025.
4
Developing and validating a prediction tool for cerebral amyloid angiopathy neuropathological severity.开发并验证一种用于脑淀粉样血管病神经病理学严重程度的预测工具。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Mar;21(3):e14583. doi: 10.1002/alz.14583.
5
A point-based cognitive impairment scoring system for southeast Asian adults.一种针对东南亚成年人的基于点数的认知障碍评分系统。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Apr;12(4):100069. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100069. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
6
Machine Learning for Early Detection of Cognitive Decline in Parkinson's Disease Using Multimodal Biomarker and Clinical Data.利用多模态生物标志物和临床数据的机器学习用于帕金森病认知衰退的早期检测
Biomedicines. 2024 Dec 3;12(12):2758. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122758.
7
A universal AutoScore framework to develop interpretable scoring systems for predicting common types of clinical outcomes.一个用于开发可解释评分系统以预测常见类型临床结果的通用自动评分框架。
STAR Protoc. 2023 May 12;4(2):102302. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102302.
使用机器学习开发并验证用于院外心脏骤停患者的可解释的院前自主循环恢复(P-ROSC)评分:一项回顾性研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 May 6;48:101422. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101422. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Using Machine Learning Techniques to Develop Risk Prediction Models for the Risk of Incident Diabetic Retinopathy Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cohort Study.运用机器学习技术为 2 型糖尿病患者发生糖尿病视网膜病变的风险开发预测模型:一项队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 May 17;13:876559. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.876559. eCollection 2022.
5
Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead.停止为高风险决策解释黑箱机器学习模型,转而使用可解释模型。
Nat Mach Intell. 2019 May;1(5):206-215. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x. Epub 2019 May 13.
6
Development and validation of an interpretable clinical score for early identification of acute kidney injury at the emergency department.开发和验证一种可解释的临床评分,用于在急诊科早期识别急性肾损伤。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 2;12(1):7111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-11129-4.
7
Predicting Amyloid Positivity in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults: A Machine Learning Approach Using A4 Data.使用 A4 数据预测认知正常的老年人中的淀粉样蛋白阳性:一种机器学习方法。
Neurology. 2022 Jun 14;98(24):e2425-e2435. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200553. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
8
Leveraging Large-Scale Electronic Health Records and Interpretable Machine Learning for Clinical Decision Making at the Emergency Department: Protocol for System Development and Validation.利用大规模电子健康记录和可解释机器学习进行急诊科临床决策:系统开发与验证方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 25;11(3):e34201. doi: 10.2196/34201.
9
Development and validation of the SARICA score to predict survival after return of spontaneous circulation in out of hospital cardiac arrest using an interpretable machine learning framework.使用可解释机器学习框架开发和验证 SARICA 评分,以预测院外心脏骤停自主循环恢复后的生存率。
Resuscitation. 2022 Jan;170:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.11.029. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
10
Regularized Ordinal Regression and the ordinalNet R Package.正则化有序回归与ordinalNet R包。
J Stat Softw. 2021 Sep;99(6). doi: 10.18637/jss.v099.i06.