• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实用:无结构临床记录中的自动表型标注——重症监护病房的应用

Clinical utility of automatic phenotype annotation in unstructured clinical notes: intensive care unit use.

机构信息

Pangaea Data Limited, London, UK.

Pangaea Data Limited, London, UK

出版信息

BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Nov;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100519.

DOI:10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100519
PMID:36351702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9644312/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinical notes contain information that has not been documented elsewhere, including responses to treatment and clinical findings, which are crucial for predicting key outcomes in patients in acute care. In this study, we propose the automatic annotation of phenotypes from clinical notes as a method to capture essential information to predict outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU). This information is complementary to typically used vital signs and laboratory test results.

METHODS

In this study, we developed a novel phenotype annotation model to extract the phenotypical features of patients, which were then used as input features of predictive models to predict ICU patient outcomes. We demonstrated and validated this approach by conducting experiments on three ICU prediction tasks, including in-hospital mortality, physiological decompensation and length of stay (LOS) for over 24 000 patients using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) dataset.

RESULTS

The predictive models incorporating phenotypical information achieved 0.845 (area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC)) for in-hospital mortality, 0.839 (AUC-ROC) for physiological decompensation and 0.430 (kappa) for LOS, all of which consistently outperformed the baseline models using only vital signs and laboratory test results. Moreover, we conducted a thorough interpretability study showing that phenotypes provide valuable insights at both the patient and cohort levels.

CONCLUSION

The proposed approach demonstrates that phenotypical information complements traditionally used vital signs and laboratory test results and significantly improves the accuracy of outcome prediction in the ICU.

摘要

目的

临床记录包含其他地方未记录的信息,包括对治疗的反应和临床发现,这些对于预测急性护理患者的关键结局至关重要。在这项研究中,我们提出了从临床记录中自动标注表型的方法,以捕获关键信息来预测重症监护病房(ICU)的结局。这些信息是对通常使用的生命体征和实验室检查结果的补充。

方法

在这项研究中,我们开发了一种新的表型标注模型来提取患者的表型特征,然后将其作为预测模型的输入特征,用于预测 ICU 患者的结局。我们通过在三个 ICU 预测任务上进行实验,使用医疗信息监护 ICU(MIMIC-III)数据集对超过 24000 名患者进行了演示和验证,这三个任务包括院内死亡率、生理失代偿和 24 小时以上的住院时间(LOS)。

结果

纳入表型信息的预测模型在院内死亡率方面的预测值为 0.845(曲线下面积-接受者操作特征(AUC-ROC)),在生理失代偿方面的预测值为 0.839(AUC-ROC),在 LOS 方面的预测值为 0.430(kappa),均优于仅使用生命体征和实验室检查结果的基线模型。此外,我们进行了一项彻底的可解释性研究,表明表型在患者和队列水平都提供了有价值的见解。

结论

提出的方法表明,表型信息补充了传统使用的生命体征和实验室检查结果,显著提高了 ICU 结局预测的准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77c/9644312/53ab22a4f88c/bmjhci-2021-100519f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77c/9644312/3b41a647cf85/bmjhci-2021-100519f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77c/9644312/6fc3aa61d815/bmjhci-2021-100519f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77c/9644312/53ab22a4f88c/bmjhci-2021-100519f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77c/9644312/3b41a647cf85/bmjhci-2021-100519f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77c/9644312/6fc3aa61d815/bmjhci-2021-100519f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c77c/9644312/53ab22a4f88c/bmjhci-2021-100519f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical utility of automatic phenotype annotation in unstructured clinical notes: intensive care unit use.临床实用:无结构临床记录中的自动表型标注——重症监护病房的应用
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Nov;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100519.
2
Machine learning combining CT findings and clinical parameters improves prediction of length of stay and ICU admission in torso trauma.机器学习结合 CT 表现和临床参数可提高对胸腹部创伤患者住院时间和 ICU 入住的预测。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jul;31(7):5434-5441. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07534-w. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
4
Integrating Structured and Unstructured EHR Data for Predicting Mortality by Machine Learning and Latent Dirichlet Allocation Method.基于机器学习和潜在狄利克雷分配方法的整合结构化和非结构化电子健康记录数据预测死亡率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4340. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054340.
5
Predicting Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay and Mortality Using Patient Vital Signs: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation.利用患者生命体征预测重症监护病房住院时间和死亡率:机器学习模型的开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 5;9(5):e21347. doi: 10.2196/21347.
6
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
7
Explainable time-series deep learning models for the prediction of mortality, prolonged length of stay and 30-day readmission in intensive care patients.用于预测重症监护患者死亡率、延长住院时间和30天再入院率的可解释时间序列深度学习模型。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 28;9:933037. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.933037. eCollection 2022.
8
Unstructured clinical notes within the 24 hours since admission predict short, mid & long-term mortality in adult ICU patients.入院后 24 小时内的非结构化临床记录可预测成人 ICU 患者的短期、中期和长期死亡率。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 6;17(1):e0262182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262182. eCollection 2022.
9
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.一种用于 ICU 中脓毒症准确预测的可解释机器学习模型。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.
10
[Predicting prolonged length of intensive care unit stay machine learning].[预测重症监护病房长期住院时间 机器学习]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Dec 18;53(6):1163-1170. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.06.026.

引用本文的文献

1
Lightweight transformers for clinical natural language processing.用于临床自然语言处理的轻量级变压器
Nat Lang Eng. 2024 Sep;30(5):887-914. doi: 10.1017/S1351324923000542. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing machine learning algorithms for predicting ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19.比较用于预测新冠肺炎重症监护病房收治率和死亡率的机器学习算法
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 May 21;4(1):87. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00456-x.
2
Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology: a retrospective study of the Danish National Patient Registry and electronic patient records.基于长期疾病史和急性生理学数据聚合的重症监护病房患者生存预测:丹麦国家患者登记处和电子患者记录的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jun;1(2):e78-e89. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
Comorbidities and medical history essential for mortality prediction in critically ill patients.
合并症和病史对危重症患者的死亡率预测至关重要。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jun;1(2):e48-e49. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30030-5. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2021.2021 年人类表型本体论。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1207-D1217. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1043.
5
Ensembles of natural language processing systems for portable phenotyping solutions.用于便携表型解决方案的自然语言处理系统集合。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Dec;100:103318. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103318. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Multitask learning and benchmarking with clinical time series data.多任务学习与临床时间序列数据的基准测试。
Sci Data. 2019 Jun 17;6(1):96. doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0103-9.
7
Identifying Clinical Terms in Medical Text Using Ontology-Guided Machine Learning.使用本体引导的机器学习识别医学文本中的临床术语。
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 May 10;7(2):e12596. doi: 10.2196/12596.
8
Managing Unstructured Big Data in Healthcare System.医疗系统中无结构大数据的管理
Healthc Inform Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):1-2. doi: 10.4258/hir.2019.25.1.1. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
Are ICU Length of Stay Predictions Worthwhile?重症监护病房住院时间预测是否值得?
Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;45(2):379-380. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002111.
10
Machine Learning and Decision Support in Critical Care.重症监护中的机器学习与决策支持
Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng. 2016 Feb;104(2):444-466. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2501978. Epub 2016 Jan 25.