Suppr超能文献

膝关节基质诱导自体软骨细胞植入术中膜的固定:一项系统评价

Fixation of the Membrane during Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Knee: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Migliorini Filippo, Vaishya Raju, Bell Andreas, Weber Christian D, Götze Christian, Maffulli Nicola

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Eifelklinik St.Brigida, 52152 Simmerath, Germany.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 27;12(11):1718. doi: 10.3390/life12111718.

Abstract

Introduction: It is unclear whether the type of membrane used for matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation (mACI) influences results. A systematic review was conducted to investigate the midterm results of the three most common types of membrane fixation for mACI. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the 2020 PRISMA checklist. PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus online databases were accessed in August 2022. All the prospective clinical trials reporting outcomes of mACI in the knee were considered. Studies that describe the modality of membrane fixation (glued, glued, and sutured, no fixation) used for mACI were eligible. Studies that conducted a minimum of 12 months of follow-up were considered. The outcomes of interest were the Tegner Activity Scale and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. The rate of failure and revisions were also collected. Results: Data from 26 studies (1539 procedures; 554 of 1539 (36%) were women) were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 42.6 (12 to 84) months. No difference between the groups was found in terms of mean duration of symptoms, age, BMI, gender, and defect size (P > 0.1). No difference was found in terms of the Tegner score (P = 0.3). When no fixation was used, a statistically significant higher IKDC compared to the other groups (P = 0.02) was evidenced. No difference was found in the rate of failure (P = 0.1). The no-fixation group evidenced a statistically significant lower rate of revisions (P = 0.02). Conclusions: No membrane fixation for mACI in the knee scored better than the fastening techniques at the midterm follow-up.

摘要

引言

用于基质辅助自体软骨细胞植入术(mACI)的膜的类型是否会影响结果尚不清楚。进行了一项系统评价,以研究mACI三种最常见的膜固定类型的中期结果。方法:本系统评价按照2020年PRPR�PRISMA清单进行。2022年8月检索了PubMed、谷歌学术、Embase和Scopus在线数据库。纳入所有报告膝关节mACI结果的前瞻性临床试验。描述用于mACI的膜固定方式(粘贴、粘贴和缝合、无固定)的研究符合要求。纳入至少随访12个月的研究。感兴趣的结果指标为特格纳活动量表和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分。还收集了失败率和翻修率。结果:检索到26项研究的数据(1539例手术;1539例中的554例(36%)为女性)。平均随访时间为42.6(12至84)个月。在症状平均持续时间、年龄、体重指数、性别和缺损大小方面,各组之间未发现差异(P>0.1)。在特格纳评分方面未发现差异(P=0.3)。当不使用固定时,与其他组相比,IKDC评分在统计学上显著更高(P=0.02)。在失败率方面未发现差异(P=0.1)。无固定组的翻修率在统计学上显著更低(P=0.02)。结论:在中期随访中,膝关节mACI的无膜固定在评分上并不优于固定技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21c3/9698345/4aabad40e07e/life-12-01718-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验