• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

柬埔寨森林居民疟疾风险、预防和求医行为的行为决定因素。

Behavioural determinants of malaria risk, prevention, and care-seeking behaviours among forest-goers in Cambodia.

机构信息

Population Services International, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

Population Services International, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Malar J. 2022 Dec 2;21(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04390-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12936-022-04390-5
PMID:36457085
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9716661/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cambodia has made significant progress towards achieving malaria elimination by 2025. Cases continue to decrease and are primarily concentrated in forested areas. Forest-goers are most at risk of malaria due to their proximity to the forest, poor sleeping conditions, frequent mobility, and distance from health services. Consistent use of long-lasting insecticidal nets or hammock nets (LLINs/LLIHNs), early diagnosis and treatment of cases are central to reducing disease burden. The aim of this study was to understand forest-goers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to malaria prevention and care-seeking, and to identify key behavioural determinants of LLIN/LLIHN use and prompt care-seeking within 24 h of developing a fever.

METHODS

A mixed-methods study design consisting of a cross-sectional survey and qualitative in-depth interviews was implemented in two Cambodian provinces. Survey participants (N = 654) were recruited using respondent driven sampling. Interview participants (N = 28) were selected using purposive sampling. Findings from the survey were analysed using univariate and bivariate analysis and multivariate weighted logistic regression. Interviews were coded and analysed using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

All study participants had heard of malaria and 98% knew that malaria was transmitted by mosquitoes. LLIN/LLIHN ownership was high (94%). Although 99% of participants perceived LLIN/LLIHN use as an important malaria prevention measure, only 76% reported using one during their last visit to the forest. Only 39% of survey participants who reported seeking care did so within the recommended 24 h from fever onset during their last febrile illness. Among all study participants, 43% did not seek any healthcare during their last febrile episode. In controlled regression models, perceived community social norms were significantly associated with LLIN/LLIHN use (OR: 2.7, 96% CI 1.99-2.64) and care-seeking within 24 h of fever onset (OR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.00-2.88). Social support from other forest-goers was also significantly associated with LLIN/LLIHN use (OR: 4.9, 95% CI 1.32-18.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings are consistent with other studies on LLIN/LLIHN use and care-seeking behaviours. While rates of LLIN/LLIHN ownership were high among the study population, rates of use were not as high. More concerning were the delayed care-seeking behaviours. Social behaviour change activities should incorporate social norms and social support as mechanisms for behaviour change given the identified positive correlations with LLIN/LLIHN use and prompt care-seeking.

摘要

背景

柬埔寨在实现 2025 年消除疟疾目标方面取得了重大进展。病例持续减少,主要集中在森林地区。由于靠近森林、睡眠条件差、频繁流动以及远离医疗服务,森林工作者面临最大的疟疾风险。持续使用长效驱虫蚊帐或吊床蚊帐(LLIN/LLIHN)、及时诊断和治疗病例是减轻疾病负担的核心。本研究旨在了解森林工作者在预防和寻求疟疾护理方面的知识、态度和做法,并确定 LLIN/LLIHN 使用和发热后 24 小时内及时就医的关键行为决定因素。

方法

本研究采用横断面调查和定性深入访谈相结合的混合方法设计,在柬埔寨的两个省份实施。使用应答驱动抽样法招募调查参与者(N=654)。采用目的性抽样法选择访谈参与者(N=28)。使用单变量和双变量分析以及多变量加权逻辑回归分析对调查结果进行分析。对访谈内容进行编码和主题内容分析。

结果

所有研究参与者都听说过疟疾,98%的人知道疟疾是由蚊子传播的。LLIN/LLIHN 的拥有率很高(94%)。尽管 99%的参与者认为 LLIN/LLIHN 使用是预防疟疾的重要措施,但只有 76%的参与者在最近一次前往森林时使用了 LLIN/LLIHN。在最近一次发热性疾病期间,仅 39%的报告就医的调查参与者在建议的 24 小时内就医。在所有研究参与者中,43%的人在最近一次发热时没有寻求任何医疗服务。在控制回归模型中,社区社会规范感知与 LLIN/LLIHN 使用(OR:2.7,96%CI 1.99-2.64)和发热后 24 小时内就医(OR:1.7,95%CI 1.00-2.88)显著相关。来自其他森林工作者的社会支持也与 LLIN/LLIHN 使用显著相关(OR:4.9,95%CI 1.32-18.12)。

结论

研究结果与其他关于 LLIN/LLIHN 使用和就医行为的研究一致。虽然研究人群中 LLIN/LLIHN 的拥有率很高,但使用率却不高。更令人担忧的是就医时间延迟。鉴于已确定的与 LLIN/LLIHN 使用和及时就医相关的积极关联,社会行为改变活动应将社会规范和社会支持作为行为改变的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b230/9716661/5ddecc14f7cf/12936_2022_4390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b230/9716661/5ddecc14f7cf/12936_2022_4390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b230/9716661/5ddecc14f7cf/12936_2022_4390_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Behavioural determinants of malaria risk, prevention, and care-seeking behaviours among forest-goers in Cambodia.柬埔寨森林居民疟疾风险、预防和求医行为的行为决定因素。
Malar J. 2022 Dec 2;21(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04390-5.
2
The use of respondent‑driven sampling to assess febrile illness treatment-seeking behaviours among forest-goers in Cambodia and Vietnam.应用应答驱动抽样法评估柬埔寨和越南森林工作者发热求医行为。
Malar J. 2021 Dec 20;20(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-04001-9.
3
Cambodia malaria indicator survey 2020: Implications for malaria elimination.2020年柬埔寨疟疾指标调查:对疟疾消除的启示
Malariaworld J. 2021 Jul 1;12:5. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessment of net lending strategy to better reach mobile and migrant populations in malaria endemic areas of Cambodia.评估净借贷策略,以更好地覆盖柬埔寨疟疾流行地区的流动和移民人群。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Oct 18;7(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0489-1.
5
Determinants of prompt and adequate care among presumed malaria cases in a community in eastern Rwanda: a cross sectional study.卢旺达东部一个社区疑似疟疾病例获得及时充分治疗的决定因素:一项横断面研究
Malar J. 2016 Apr 21;15:227. doi: 10.1186/s12936-016-1285-7.
6
Re-imagining malaria: heterogeneity of human and mosquito behaviour in relation to residual malaria transmission in Cambodia.重新构想疟疾:柬埔寨人类与蚊子行为的异质性与残留疟疾传播的关系
Malar J. 2015 Apr 24;14:165. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0689-0.
7
Factors influencing the ownership and utilization of long-lasting insecticidal nets for malaria prevention in Ethiopia.影响埃塞俄比亚用于疟疾预防的长效驱虫蚊帐所有权及使用情况的因素。
Malar J. 2017 Jul 1;16(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1907-8.
8
Choice of health providers and health-seeking behaviour among forest goer population in Myanmar: findings from a cross-sectional household survey.缅甸伐木工人群体对卫生服务提供者的选择和寻医行为:一项横断面家庭调查的结果。
Malar J. 2022 Dec 14;21(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04356-7.
9
How can interventions that target forest-goers be tailored to accelerate malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion? A systematic review of the qualitative literature.如何针对森林游客实施干预措施,以加速大湄公河次区域消除疟疾?定性文献的系统评价。
Malar J. 2019 Feb 1;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2666-5.
10
Choosing interventions to eliminate forest malaria: preliminary results of two operational research studies inside Cambodian forests.选择干预措施消除森林疟疾:柬埔寨森林内两项实施性研究的初步结果。
Malar J. 2021 Jan 20;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03572-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The costs and logistics of distributing 'forest packs' containing novel vector control tools to forest-exposed populations in Cambodia.向柬埔寨森林地区居民分发包含新型病媒控制工具的“森林包”的成本及后勤工作。
Malar J. 2025 Jan 7;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05237-x.
2
Why becoming a positive deviant for malaria prevention and control: a sequential explanatory mixed methods study in Bugesera district, Rwanda.为何成为疟疾防控的积极反常者:卢旺达布格塞拉地区的一项序贯解释性混合方法研究。
Malar J. 2024 Sep 19;23(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05108-5.
3
Impact of targeted drug administration and intermittent preventive treatment for forest goers using artesunate-pyronaridine to control malaria outbreaks in Cambodia.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of respondent‑driven sampling to assess febrile illness treatment-seeking behaviours among forest-goers in Cambodia and Vietnam.应用应答驱动抽样法评估柬埔寨和越南森林工作者发热求医行为。
Malar J. 2021 Dec 20;20(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-04001-9.
2
Acceptability and feasibility of malaria prophylaxis for forest goers: findings from a qualitative study in Cambodia.森林工作者疟疾预防措施的可接受性和可行性:柬埔寨定性研究的结果。
Malar J. 2021 Nov 25;20(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03983-w.
3
Ownership and utilization of bed nets and reasons for use or non-use of bed nets among community members at risk of malaria along the Thai-Myanmar border.
在柬埔寨,使用青蒿琥酯-咯萘啶对森林居民进行靶向给药和间歇性预防治疗以控制疟疾疫情的影响。
Trop Med Health. 2024 Jun 11;52(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41182-024-00607-2.
4
Knowledge, compliance, and challenges in anti-malarial products usage: a systematic review of at-risk communities for zoonotic malaria.抗疟产品使用的知识、合规性和挑战:对动物源性疟疾高危社区的系统回顾。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17792-8.
泰国-缅甸边境地区有疟疾感染风险的社区成员中蚊帐的所有权、使用情况以及使用或不使用蚊帐的原因。
Malar J. 2021 Jul 6;20(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03837-5.
4
Choosing interventions to eliminate forest malaria: preliminary results of two operational research studies inside Cambodian forests.选择干预措施消除森林疟疾:柬埔寨森林内两项实施性研究的初步结果。
Malar J. 2021 Jan 20;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03572-3.
5
Scaling up malaria elimination management and leadership: a pilot in three provinces in Zimbabwe, 2016-2018.在津巴布韦三省扩大疟疾消除管理和领导力:2016-2018 年试点
Malar J. 2020 May 20;19(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03255-z.
6
Malaria elimination using the 1-3-7 approach: lessons from Sampov Loun, Cambodia.使用 1-3-7 方法消除疟疾:柬埔寨桑坡卢恩的经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08634-4.
7
Tools to accelerate falciparum malaria elimination in Cambodia: a meeting report.加速柬埔寨消除恶性疟的工具:会议报告。
Malar J. 2020 Apr 15;19(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03197-6.
8
Social norms, misperceptions, and mosquito net use: a population-based, cross-sectional study in rural Uganda.社会规范、误解与蚊帐使用:乌干达农村一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Malar J. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2798-7.
9
How can interventions that target forest-goers be tailored to accelerate malaria elimination in the Greater Mekong Subregion? A systematic review of the qualitative literature.如何针对森林游客实施干预措施,以加速大湄公河次区域消除疟疾?定性文献的系统评价。
Malar J. 2019 Feb 1;18(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2666-5.
10
Integration of the Opportunity-Ability-Motivation behavior change framework into a coaching-based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist program in India.将机会-能力-动机行为改变框架融入基于辅导的世卫组织安全分娩清单方案在印度的应用。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Sep;142(3):321-328. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12542. Epub 2018 Jun 20.