• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中文版本的应急护士压力量表:一种方法论研究设计。

Chinese version of the stressor scale for emergency nurse: A methodological study design.

机构信息

Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 May;10(5):2999-3010. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1546. Epub 2022 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.1546
PMID:36484242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10077376/
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to modify and test the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the stressor scale for emergency nurses.

DESIGN

The methodological design was carried out in two phases: (a) form the Chinese version by Delphi method and (b) test the psychometric properties by cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

The translated scale was administered to 420 nurses in Qingdao. Validity was assessed in terms of content validity, calibration correlation validity and construct validity using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency was estimated using Cronbach α coefficients.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of the SSEN retains 27 items, four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the factor cumulative variance contribution rate was 78.463%. The fitting indexes of the four-factor model of CFA were all in the acceptable range[χ  = 711.30, df = 312, p < 0.001, χ /df = 2.280, CFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.924, IFI = 0.933, RMSEA = 0.079 (90% confidence interval = 0.071-0.086)].The item-level content validity index of the Chinese SSEN is 0.89 ~ 1.00; the scale-level content validity index is 0.98; the Cronbach α coefficient of the total table is 0.971 and the split-half reliability is 0.877.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The C-SSEN can be used to help nursing managers accurately formulate management measures to improve the stress coping ability of nurses in the ED, stabilize the nursing team and ensure nursing safety.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在修改并检验中文版急诊护士应激量表的心理测量学特性。

设计

方法学设计分两个阶段进行:(a)采用德尔菲法形成中文版,(b)采用横断面调查法检验心理测量学特性。

方法

将翻译后的量表应用于青岛市 420 名护士。采用内容效度、校准相关性效度和结构效度评估量表的有效性,使用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析。采用 Cronbach α 系数评估内部一致性。

结果

中文版 SSEN 保留 27 个条目,通过探索性因子分析提取出 4 个公因子,因子累积方差贡献率为 78.463%。验证性因子分析的 4 因素模型拟合指标均在可接受范围内[χ²=711.30,df=312,p<0.001,χ/df=2.280,CFI=0.933,TLI=0.924,IFI=0.933,RMSEA=0.079(90%置信区间为 0.0710.086)]。中文版 SSEN 的项目水平内容效度指数为 0.891.00,量表水平内容效度指数为 0.98;总量表的 Cronbach α 系数为 0.971,分半信度为 0.877。

患者或公众贡献

C-SSEN 可用于帮助护理管理者准确制定管理措施,提高急诊护士的应激应对能力,稳定护理团队,保障护理安全。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb4/10077376/4462b7f07d70/NOP2-10-2999-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb4/10077376/4462b7f07d70/NOP2-10-2999-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb4/10077376/4462b7f07d70/NOP2-10-2999-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Chinese version of the stressor scale for emergency nurse: A methodological study design.中文版本的应急护士压力量表:一种方法论研究设计。
Nurs Open. 2023 May;10(5):2999-3010. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1546. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
2
The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the stressor scale for emergency nurses.中文版急诊护士应激源量表的心理测量学特性。
Australas Emerg Care. 2023 Jun;26(2):179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2022.10.005. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
3
Psychometric properties assessment of Chinese version of work readiness scale for graduate nurses (WRS-GN) and associated factors of work readiness: Two cross-sectional studies.中文版护士工作准备度量表(WRS-GN)的心理计量学特性评估及其工作准备度的相关因素:两项横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jun;89:104416. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104416. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
4
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the coronary artery disease empowerment scale (CADES) in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.中文版冠心病患者授权量表(CADES)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的冠心病患者中的信度和效度。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04114-4.
5
Cross-cultural validation of the Student Nurse Stress Index Scale: A descriptive survey targeting student nurses in China.跨文化验证《护生压力量表》:针对中国护生的描述性调查。
J Affect Disord. 2019 May 15;251:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the breast cancer perception scale for community women: a translation and validation study.社区妇女乳腺癌感知量表中文版的心理计量学评估:翻译与验证研究。
Breast Cancer. 2024 Jan;31(1):42-52. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01508-8. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
7
Valuation of the cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the hidden curriculum evaluation scale in nursing education.护理教育中隐性课程评价量表中文版的文化适应性和心理测量学特性的评估。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Feb;75:103880. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103880. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Positive Health Behaviours Scale for clinical nurses: a cross-sectional translation.临床护士积极健康行为量表中文版的心理测量学评价:横断面翻译
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 31;22(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01453-z.
9
Development of a Chinese version of the Stress Adaption Scale and the assessment of its reliability and validity among Chinese patients with multimorbidity.中文版本的应激适应量表的开发及在中国多病种患者中评估其信度和效度。
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jun 25;52(3):361-370. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2022-0721.
10
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for Chinese nurses.《中文版奥伦伯格职业倦怠量表用于中国护士的信度和效度研究》。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):320-328. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1065. Epub 2021 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and preliminary evaluation of Chinese School-aged Children's Eating Behavior Scale.发展与初步评估中文版学龄儿童饮食行为量表。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2021 Sep 20;40(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s41043-021-00265-8.
2
Associations between stressful working conditions and psychosomatic symptoms among Palestinian nurses: a cross-sectional survey.巴勒斯坦护士工作压力状况与身心症状之间的关联:一项横断面调查。
Lancet. 2021 Jul;398 Suppl 1:S33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01519-1.
3
Reconsidering the Conditions for Conducting Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
重新思考进行验证性因素分析的条件。
Span J Psychol. 2020 Dec 4;23:e55. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2020.56.
4
Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Emotional Labour Scale for nurses.护士情感劳动量表中文版的翻译与心理计量学验证。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 May;28(4):948-958. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13029.
5
A Multicenter Study into Burnout, Perceived Stress, Job Satisfaction, Coping Strategies, and General Health among Emergency Department Nursing Staff.一项关于急诊科护理人员职业倦怠、感知压力、工作满意度、应对策略及总体健康状况的多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 2;9(4):1007. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041007.
6
Effectiveness of stress management interventional programme on occupational stress for nurses: A systematic review.压力管理干预方案对护士职业压力的有效性:系统评价。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Mar;28(2):209-220. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12938. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
A longitudinal assessment of occupational stress in Emergency Department Nursing Staff.急诊科护理人员职业压力的纵向评估。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 Jan;28(1):167-174. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12910.
8
A Cross Sectional Study Evaluating Psychosocial Job Stress and Health Risk in Emergency Department Nurses.横断面研究评价急诊科护士的心理社会工作压力和健康风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 4;16(18):3243. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183243.
9
Factor and reliability analysis of a brief scale to measure motivation to change lifestyle for dementia risk reduction in the UK: the MOCHAD-10.用于衡量英国降低痴呆风险的生活方式改变动机的简短量表的因子和信度分析:MOCHAD-10。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 May 2;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1143-8.
10
Exposure to work stress and use of psychotropic medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.工作压力暴露与精神药物使用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):569-576. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211752. Epub 2019 Mar 26.