National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK.
National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK.
EBioMedicine. 2023 Jan;87:104402. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104402. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
Most studies of immunity to SARS-CoV-2 focus on circulating antibody, giving limited insights into mucosal defences that prevent viral replication and onward transmission. We studied nasal and plasma antibody responses one year after hospitalisation for COVID-19, including a period when SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was introduced.
In this follow up study, plasma and nasosorption samples were prospectively collected from 446 adults hospitalised for COVID-19 between February 2020 and March 2021 via the ISARIC4C and PHOSP-COVID consortia. IgA and IgG responses to NP and S of ancestral SARS-CoV-2, Delta and Omicron (BA.1) variants were measured by electrochemiluminescence and compared with plasma neutralisation data.
Strong and consistent nasal anti-NP and anti-S IgA responses were demonstrated, which remained elevated for nine months (p < 0.0001). Nasal and plasma anti-S IgG remained elevated for at least 12 months (p < 0.0001) with plasma neutralising titres that were raised against all variants compared to controls (p < 0.0001). Of 323 with complete data, 307 were vaccinated between 6 and 12 months; coinciding with rises in nasal and plasma IgA and IgG anti-S titres for all SARS-CoV-2 variants, although the change in nasal IgA was minimal (1.46-fold change after 10 months, p = 0.011) and the median remained below the positive threshold determined by pre-pandemic controls. Samples 12 months after admission showed no association between nasal IgA and plasma IgG anti-S responses (R = 0.05, p = 0.18), indicating that nasal IgA responses are distinct from those in plasma and minimally boosted by vaccination.
The decline in nasal IgA responses 9 months after infection and minimal impact of subsequent vaccination may explain the lack of long-lasting nasal defence against reinfection and the limited effects of vaccination on transmission. These findings highlight the need to develop vaccines that enhance nasal immunity.
This study has been supported by ISARIC4C and PHOSP-COVID consortia. ISARIC4C is supported by grants from the National Institute for Health and Care Research and the Medical Research Council. Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre provided infrastructure support for this research. The PHOSP-COVD study is jointly funded by UK Research and Innovation and National Institute of Health and Care Research. The funders were not involved in the study design, interpretation of data or the writing of this manuscript.
大多数关于 SARS-CoV-2 免疫的研究都集中在循环抗体上,这对防止病毒复制和传播的粘膜防御提供了有限的见解。我们研究了 COVID-19 住院一年后鼻腔和血浆抗体反应,包括引入 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种的时期。
在这项后续研究中,通过 ISARIC4C 和 PHOSP-COVID 联盟前瞻性地从 2020 年 2 月至 2021 年 3 月期间因 COVID-19 住院的 446 名成年人中收集了血浆和鼻抽吸样本。通过电化学发光测量了针对祖先 SARS-CoV-2、Delta 和奥密克戎(BA.1)变体的 NP 和 S 的 IgA 和 IgG 反应,并与血浆中和数据进行了比较。
强烈且一致的鼻内抗 NP 和抗 S IgA 反应得到了证实,这种反应在九个月内仍保持升高(p<0.0001)。鼻内和血浆抗 S IgG 在至少 12 个月内仍保持升高(p<0.0001),与对照相比,所有变体的血浆中和效价均升高(p<0.0001)。在 323 名有完整数据的患者中,有 307 名在 6 至 12 个月内接种了疫苗;与所有 SARS-CoV-2 变体的鼻内和血浆 IgA 和 IgG 抗 S 滴度升高同时发生,尽管鼻内 IgA 的变化最小(10 个月后 1.46 倍的变化,p=0.011),中位数仍低于大流行前对照组确定的阳性阈值。入院后 12 个月的样本显示,鼻内 IgA 与血浆 IgG 抗 S 反应之间没有关联(R=0.05,p=0.18),这表明鼻内 IgA 反应与血浆中的反应不同,并且受疫苗接种的影响很小。
感染后 9 个月鼻内 IgA 反应下降,随后疫苗接种的影响最小,这可能解释了针对再感染的鼻腔防御能力长期不足,以及疫苗接种对传播的影响有限。这些发现强调了需要开发增强鼻腔免疫的疫苗。
这项研究得到了 ISARIC4C 和 PHOSP-COVID 联盟的支持。ISARIC4C 得到了英国国家卫生与保健研究所和医学研究理事会的资助。利物浦实验癌症医学中心为这项研究提供了基础设施支持。PHOSP-COVD 研究由英国研究与创新署和英国国家卫生与保健研究所联合资助。资助者没有参与研究设计、数据解释或本手稿的撰写。