Multack Samuel, Pan Li-Chen, Timmons Sean K, Datar Manasi, Hsiao Chia-Wen, Babu Raiju, Pan Sun-Ming, Woodard Lawrence
Multack Eye Care and Associates, Olympia Fields, IL, USA.
Commercial Strategy and Market Access, Boston Healthcare Associates (a Veranex Company), Boston, MA, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 5;17:1-13. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S384545. eCollection 2023.
This study aims to assess the time impact of ARGOS (image-guided swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer integrated with operating room (OR) technologies (SS-OCT w/ORT)) compared to LENSTAR LS 900 (optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR)), IOLMaster 500 (partial coherence interferometry (PCI)), and IOLMaster 700 (SS-OCT) on efficiency in the cataract evaluation and surgery.
Data from 212 patients (two study sites) who underwent evaluation and/or cataract surgery were collected. The primary objective was to compare the performance of four biometers; statistical analyses were conducted to compare 1) biometer measurement times for all patients (ANOVA w/post-hoc Dunnett's test) and stratified by cataract density (ANOVA) and 2) rate of biometer acquisition failure (Chi-square test w/post-hoc Bonferroni correction). Real-world observational data collected were then used to develop a practice-based time-efficiency model to demonstrate the combined effect that adopting an SS-OCT w/ORT has on a practice's cataract workflow. Real-world data inputs included assessment of patient's eyes' cataract grade density, time taken for optical biometry, Manual A-scan (ultrasound biometer) when acquisition failed, and measurement times associated with other devices used in cataract evaluation and surgery.
For 208 patients (56% non-dense, 44% dense), the SS-OCT w/ORT biometer had a 0% acquisition failure (SS-OCT: 3% (p = 0.05); OLCR: 5% (p = 0.004); PCI: 15% (p < 0.0001)) and an average time savings of 30 seconds/patient compared to the other biometers in this study (p < 0.05). When acquisition failed, ultrasound biometry resulted in an additional 2.5 minutes/patient. For a cohort of 1000 patients, an SS-OCT w/ORT and an image-guidance system adopted at a practice using an SS-OCT, femtosecond laser, and intraoperative aberrometer offer up to 58% efficiency gain across the cataract workflow.
Results from this study demonstrate an SS-OCT w/ORT's efficiencies in cataract evaluation and surgery driven by faster measurement times, reducing the need for ultrasound biometry, and its integration benefits with other devices.
本研究旨在评估与LENSTAR LS 900(光学低相干反射测量仪(OLCR))、IOLMaster 500(部分相干干涉测量仪(PCI))和IOLMaster 700(扫频源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT))相比,ARGOS(与手术室(OR)技术集成的图像引导扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪(SS-OCT w/ORT))对白内障评估和手术效率的时间影响。
收集了来自212例患者(两个研究地点)的评估和/或白内障手术数据。主要目的是比较四种生物测量仪的性能;进行统计分析以比较1)所有患者的生物测量仪测量时间(方差分析及事后Dunnett检验),并按白内障密度分层(方差分析),以及2)生物测量仪采集失败率(卡方检验及事后Bonferroni校正)。然后使用收集到的真实世界观察数据来建立一个基于实践的时间效率模型,以证明采用SS-OCT w/ORT对实践中白内障工作流程的综合影响。真实世界的数据输入包括对患者眼睛白内障等级密度的评估、光学生物测量所需时间、采集失败时的手动A超扫描(超声生物测量仪)以及与白内障评估和手术中使用的其他设备相关的测量时间。
对于208例患者(56%为非致密性白内障,44%为致密性白内障),SS-OCT w/ORT生物测量仪的采集失败率为0%(SS-OCT:3%(p = 0.05);OLCR:5%(p = 0.004);PCI:15%(p < 0.0001)),与本研究中的其他生物测量仪相比,每位患者平均节省30秒(p < 0.05)。当采集失败时,超声生物测量会使每位患者额外增加2.5分钟。对于一组1000例患者,在采用SS-OCT、飞秒激光和术中像差仪的实践中采用SS-OCT w/ORT和图像引导系统,可使整个白内障工作流程的效率提高多达58%。
本研究结果表明,SS-OCT w/ORT在白内障评估和手术中具有效率优势,其测量时间更快,减少了对超声生物测量的需求,并且与其他设备集成具有益处。