• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扫频源光学相干断层扫描与部分相干干涉仪生物测量仪在预测白内障手术屈光结果中的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Partial Coherence Interferometry Biometers in the Prediction of Cataract Surgery Refractive Outcomes.

作者信息

Cummings Arthur B, Naughton Stephanie, Coen Ann-Marie, Brennan Elizabeth, Kelly Gabrielle E

机构信息

The Wellington Eye Clinic, Dublin, D18 T8P3, Ireland.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 2;14:4209-4220. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S278589. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S278589
PMID:33293790
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7719307/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of pre-operative corneal measurements obtained with four devices, and the refractive outcomes of two optical biometers.

SETTING

Private practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

METHODS

Data taken from biometric measurements on 299 consecutive eyes prior to cataract surgery were retrospectively analyzed using the Argos SS-Optical Biometer and the Lenstar LS900 PCI optical biometer. As part of the standard cataract surgery pre-operative exam, patients also underwent placido disk topography and Scheimpflug tomography. Keratometry, anterior chamber depth, corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and axial length were all measured. The comparable measurements were compared. Finally, for those eyes where cataract surgery was performed, the post-operative refractive results were compared to the predictive results of the two biometers.

RESULTS

The SS-OCT Argos was able to measure all eyes, while five eyes could not be measured with the Lenstar LS900 PCI. Axial length measurements were performed only with the Argos and Lenstar devices. The eyes that could not be measured by the Lenstar LS900 PCI included dense grade IV nuclear sclerosis and large posterior subcapsular cataracts. In the primary endpoints, there was strong correlation between the Argos and the Lenstar devices in eyes with an axial length between 20 and 30 mm.

CONCLUSION

The predictive accuracies of the Argos Optical Biometer and Lenstar LS900 PCI are similar, except in medium and long eyes, in which the predictive accuracy of Argos SS-OCT biometry was higher. The Argos system was found easier to use by technicians when compared to the other biometry devices.

摘要

目的

比较四种设备术前角膜测量的准确性以及两种光学生物测量仪的屈光结果。

设置

私人诊所。

设计

回顾性研究。

方法

回顾性分析连续299只白内障手术前眼的生物测量数据,使用阿高斯SS-Optical生物测量仪和Lenstar LS900 PCI光学生物测量仪。作为标准白内障手术术前检查的一部分,患者还接受了Placido盘地形图和Scheimpflug断层扫描。测量了角膜曲率、前房深度、角膜直径、瞳孔直径、中央角膜厚度和眼轴长度。对可比较的测量结果进行了比较。最后,对于那些接受了白内障手术的眼睛,将术后屈光结果与两种生物测量仪的预测结果进行了比较。

结果

阿高斯SS-OCT能够测量所有眼睛,而Lenstar LS900 PCI无法测量五只眼睛。眼轴长度测量仅使用阿高斯和Lenstar设备进行。Lenstar LS900 PCI无法测量的眼睛包括IV级核硬化严重和后囊下大白内障。在主要终点方面,眼轴长度在20至30毫米之间的眼睛中,阿高斯和Lenstar设备之间存在很强的相关性。

结论

阿高斯光学生物测量仪和Lenstar LS900 PCI的预测准确性相似,但在中长眼方面,阿高斯SS-OCT生物测量的预测准确性更高。与其他生物测量设备相比,技术人员发现阿高斯系统更易于使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/860881ab8501/OPTH-14-4209-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/433e36e03504/OPTH-14-4209-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/11b55a0d1d9e/OPTH-14-4209-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/8fb84c3c1041/OPTH-14-4209-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/b28bd18c85df/OPTH-14-4209-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/55bd2b59e5e7/OPTH-14-4209-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/cb77335bbb04/OPTH-14-4209-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/87e7f6b938d5/OPTH-14-4209-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/cfc79f27c98b/OPTH-14-4209-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/860881ab8501/OPTH-14-4209-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/433e36e03504/OPTH-14-4209-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/11b55a0d1d9e/OPTH-14-4209-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/8fb84c3c1041/OPTH-14-4209-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/b28bd18c85df/OPTH-14-4209-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/55bd2b59e5e7/OPTH-14-4209-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/cb77335bbb04/OPTH-14-4209-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/87e7f6b938d5/OPTH-14-4209-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/cfc79f27c98b/OPTH-14-4209-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8611/7719307/860881ab8501/OPTH-14-4209-g0009.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography and Partial Coherence Interferometry Biometers in the Prediction of Cataract Surgery Refractive Outcomes.扫频源光学相干断层扫描与部分相干干涉仪生物测量仪在预测白内障手术屈光结果中的对比分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec 2;14:4209-4220. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S278589. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer.两种扫频源光相干断层生物测量仪和部分相干干涉仪的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223114. eCollection 2019.
3
Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer.比较扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪和光学低相干反射测量生物测量仪的预测准确性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 25;17:2125-2131. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S421504. eCollection 2023.
4
Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.使用新型大相干长度扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪进行生物测量
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.042.
5
Refractive Predictability and Biometry Agreement of a Combined Swept Source Optical Coherence and Reflectometry Biometer Compared to an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer and an SS-OCT Biometer.与光学低相干反射仪和扫频光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)生物测量仪相比,联合扫频源光学相干与反射测量生物测量仪的屈光预测性和生物测量一致性
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 May 22;17:1439-1452. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S408685. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients-A Comparison between Argos and IOLMaster 700: Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometers.评估白内障患者的部分生物测量参数:Argos 与 IOLMaster 700 的对比——两种基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪的生物测量仪。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 27;60(7):1057. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071057.
7
Axial length acquisition success rates and agreement of two swept-source optical biometers in eyes with dense cataracts.在患有致密白内障的眼中,两种扫频源光学生物测量仪的眼轴长度获取成功率及一致性
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 25;11:1449867. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1449867. eCollection 2024.
8
Agreement Between Two Optical Biometers Based on Large Coherence Length SS-OCT and Scheimpflug Imaging/Partial Coherence Interferometry.基于大相干长度扫频光学相干断层扫描和谢林弗鲁格成像/部分相干干涉测量的两种光学生物测量仪之间的一致性
J Refract Surg. 2020 Jul 1;36(7):459-465. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200420-02.
9
Comparison of Ocular Biometry and Refractive Outcomes Using IOL Master 500, IOL Master 700, and Lenstar LS900.使用IOL Master 500、IOL Master 700和Lenstar LS900进行眼生物测量和屈光结果的比较。
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;34(2):126-132. doi: 10.3341/kjo.2019.0102.
10
Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry.基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术的三种生物测量仪与部分相干干涉测量法在眼轴长度测量方面的综合比较
J Refract Surg. 2019 Feb 1;35(2):115-120. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190109-01.

引用本文的文献

1
Level of Agreement of Intraocular Lens Power Measurements Between a Swept-Source OCT Biometer and a Partial Coherence Interferometer.扫频光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪与部分相干干涉仪之间人工晶状体屈光力测量的一致性水平
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 2;14(11):3903. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113903.
2
A Retrospective Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Three Biometers in Short, Medium, and Long Eyes.一项比较三种生物测量仪对短眼、中等眼和长眼预测准确性的回顾性试验。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 17;19:577-583. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S487889. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluation of repeatability and agreement of two optical biometers for intraocular lens power calculation.

本文引用的文献

1
Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices.使用两种基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描的生物测量仪进行眼生物测量和屈光结果测量,这两种生物测量仪的分段或等效折射率不同。
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):6557. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3.
2
Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry.基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描技术的三种生物测量仪与部分相干干涉测量法在眼轴长度测量方面的综合比较
J Refract Surg. 2019 Feb 1;35(2):115-120. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20190109-01.
3
两种光学生物测量仪在人工晶状体度数计算中的重复性和一致性评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22151. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73206-0.
4
Bibliometric analysis of research relating to refractive cataract surgery over a 20-year period: from 2003 to 2022.2003年至2022年20年间屈光性白内障手术相关研究的文献计量分析
Int J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 18;16(10):1692-1701. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.10.20. eCollection 2023.
5
The Current Burden and Future Solutions for Preoperative Cataract-Refractive Evaluation Diagnostic Devices: A Modified Delphi Study.术前白内障屈光评估诊断设备的当前负担与未来解决方案:一项改良德尔菲研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 24;17:2109-2124. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S412847. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer.比较扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪和光学低相干反射测量生物测量仪的预测准确性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 25;17:2125-2131. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S421504. eCollection 2023.
7
Technical failure rates for biometry between swept-source and older-generation optical coherence methods: a review and meta-analysis.扫频源和旧代光学相干方法的生物测量技术失败率:综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02926-0.
Comparison of axial length using a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer - ARGOS with partial coherence interferometry- based biometer -IOLMaster among school children.
使用新型扫频源光相干断层扫描仪生物测量仪(ARGOS)与基于部分相干干涉测量术的生物测量仪(IOLMaster)对在校儿童眼轴长度进行比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 27;13(12):e0209356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209356. eCollection 2018.
4
Predictive accuracy of partial coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography for intraocular lens power calculation.部分相干干涉测量术和扫频源光学相干断层扫描预测人工晶状体度数的准确性。
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 13;8(1):13732. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32246-z.
5
Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry.采用扫频源光学相干断层扫描的新型生物测量仪与采用部分相干干涉测量的传统生物测量仪的比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0196401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196401. eCollection 2018.
6
Accuracy of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer for IOL Power Calculation and Comparison to IOLMaster.一种用于人工晶状体(IOL)度数计算的新型扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪的准确性及其与IOLMaster的比较
J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):690-695. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170721-05.
7
Comparison of AL-Scan and IOLMaster 500 Partial Coherence Interferometry Optical Biometers.AL-Scan与IOLMaster 500部分相干干涉光学生物测量仪的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2016 Oct 1;32(10):694-698. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160712-03.
8
Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.采用扫频源光相干断层扫描的新型光学生物测量仪与采用光低相干反射测量术的生物测量仪的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Aug;42(8):1165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013.
9
Biometry measurements using a new large-coherence-length swept-source optical coherence tomographer.使用新型大相干长度扫频源光学相干断层扫描仪进行生物测量
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jan;42(1):50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.042.
10
Comparing ultrasound biometry with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculations: a randomized study.比较超声生物测量与部分相干干涉测量法在人工晶状体屈光度计算中的应用:一项随机研究。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jun;50(6):2547-52. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3087. Epub 2009 Jan 24.