• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统与现代根管消毒方案对细菌、脂磷壁酸(LTA)和脂多糖(LPS)的比较。

Comparison of conventional and contemporary root canal disinfection protocols against bacteria, lipoteichoic acid (LTA), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS).

机构信息

Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 21;13(1):1206. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26855-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-26855-y
PMID:36681702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9867776/
Abstract

This study devised a dual-species biofilm model to investigate bacteria, lipoteichoic acid (LTA), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) simultaneously, and compared the efficacy of conventional and contemporary disinfection protocols. Seventy single-rooted mandibular premolars were included. Fourteen teeth were negative control, and 56 teeth were infected with 3-week-old E. faecalis and E. coli GFP biofilm. Fourteen/56 teeth were positive control, with seven teeth processed for CLSM analysis and seven teeth sampled with paper points (PPs) and cryogenically ground for bacterial, LTA, and LPS analyses. Forty-two teeth were randomly divided into three groups: GWS (GentleWave system) + MIT (minimally invasive technique), PUI (passive ultrasonic irrigation) + CIT (conventional instrumentation technique), and XP-EF (XP-endo Finisher) + CIT (All, n = 14). Samples were collected before (s1) and after disinfection (s2) with PPs and after cryogenically ground (s3). CFUs were counted, and LTA and LPS were quantified with LTA-ELISA and LAL assay, respectively. XP-EF was as effective as PUI (p > 0.05). GWS + MIT was the most effective disinfection protocol against bacteria, LTA, and LPS (p < 0.05). In conclusion, PUI, XP-EF, and GWS were highly effective against bacteria, LTA, and LPS, with GWS being the most effective.

摘要

本研究设计了一种双菌种生物膜模型,以同时研究细菌、脂磷壁酸(LTA)和脂多糖(LPS),并比较传统和现代消毒方案的效果。共纳入 70 颗单根下颌前磨牙。14 颗牙为阴性对照,56 颗牙感染 3 周龄粪肠球菌和 GFP 大肠杆菌生物膜。14/56 颗牙为阳性对照,其中 7 颗牙用于 CLSM 分析,7 颗牙用纸尖(PPs)取样并经冷冻研磨用于细菌、LTA 和 LPS 分析。42 颗牙随机分为三组:GWS(温和水动力系统)+MIT(微创技术)、PUI(被动超声冲洗)+CIT(常规器械技术)和 XP-EF(XP-endo 锉)+CIT(均 n=14)。使用 PPs 在消毒前(s1)、消毒后(s2)和经冷冻研磨后(s3)采集样本。用 CFU 计数法和 LTA-ELISA 及 LAL 测定法分别定量 LTA 和 LPS。XP-EF 与 PUI 效果相当(p>0.05)。GWS+MIT 是针对细菌、LTA 和 LPS 最有效的消毒方案(p<0.05)。综上所述,PUI、XP-EF 和 GWS 对细菌、LTA 和 LPS 的清除效果均较好,其中 GWS 效果最佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e7/9867776/4872e55aeec5/41598_2022_26855_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e7/9867776/5ec4049e16ba/41598_2022_26855_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e7/9867776/2fad1e22085d/41598_2022_26855_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e7/9867776/4872e55aeec5/41598_2022_26855_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e7/9867776/5ec4049e16ba/41598_2022_26855_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e7/9867776/2fad1e22085d/41598_2022_26855_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51e7/9867776/4872e55aeec5/41598_2022_26855_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of conventional and contemporary root canal disinfection protocols against bacteria, lipoteichoic acid (LTA), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS).传统与现代根管消毒方案对细菌、脂磷壁酸(LTA)和脂多糖(LPS)的比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 21;13(1):1206. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26855-y.
2
Efficacy of GentleWave System and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation with Minimally Invasive and Conventional Instrumentation Technique against Enterococcus faecalis Lipoteichoic Acid in Infected Root Canals.温和派系统和被动超声冲洗联合微创与常规器械技术对抗感染根管中粪肠球菌脂磷壁酸的疗效。
J Endod. 2022 Jun;48(6):768-774. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
3
Comparison of GentleWave system and passive ultrasonic irrigation with minimally invasive and conventional instrumentation against LPS in infected root canals.比较 GentleWave 系统和被动超声冲洗与微创和传统器械对感染根管中 LPS 的作用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 22;12(1):4894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08835-4.
4
A modified dentine infection model with fluorescent lipopolysaccharide and lipopolysaccharides sampling technique to compare XP-Endo finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation.一种改良的带荧光内毒素的牙本质感染模型及内毒素采样技术,用于比较 XP-Endo 锉和超声被动冲洗。
Int Endod J. 2022 Oct;55(10):1081-1090. doi: 10.1111/iej.13804. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
5
Effectiveness of Different Disinfection Protocols on the Reduction of Bacteria in Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm in Teeth with Large Root Canals.不同消毒方案对大根管牙齿中粪肠球菌生物膜内细菌减少的有效性
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):460-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
6
Quantification of Lipoteichoic Acid Contents and Cultivable Bacteria at the Different Phases of the Endodontic Retreatment.根管再治疗不同阶段脂磷壁酸含量及可培养细菌的定量分析
J Endod. 2016 Apr;42(4):552-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.01.002.
7
Influence of Adjuncts to Irrigation in the Disinfection of Large Root Canals.辅助冲洗对大根管消毒的影响。
J Endod. 2019 Mar;45(3):332-337. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.11.015.
8
A laboratory study of root canal and isthmus disinfection in extracted teeth using various activation methods with a mixture of sodium hypochlorite and etidronic acid.一项使用不同激活方法,用次氯酸钠和依替膦酸混合液对离体牙的根管和峡部进行消毒的实验室研究。
Int Endod J. 2021 Feb;54(2):268-278. doi: 10.1111/iej.13417. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
9
Impact of agitation/activation strategies on the antibiofilm potential of sodium hypochlorite/etidronate mixture in vitro.体外研究不同激惹/激活策略对次氯酸钠/依替膦酸混合物抗生物膜潜力的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 23;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02222-1.
10
Antibacterial Efficacy of a New Sonic Irrigation Device for Root Canal Disinfection.一种新型根管消毒超声冲洗装置的抗菌效果
J Endod. 2016 Dec;42(12):1799-1803. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.08.024. Epub 2016 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation Between LPS and LTA Levels With Clinical Features in Secondary Endodontic Infections.牙髓根尖周病继发感染中脂多糖和脂磷壁酸水平与临床特征的相关性
Aust Endod J. 2025 Aug;51(2):458-465. doi: 10.1111/aej.12963. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Introducing a Novel Paper Point Method for Isolated Apical Sampling-The Controlled Apical Sampling Device: A Methodological Study.介绍一种用于孤立根尖采样的新型纸尖法——可控根尖采样装置:一项方法学研究。
Biomedicines. 2025 Jun 15;13(6):1477. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061477.
3
VPA Enhances Pulp Regeneration by Regulating LPS-Induced Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells Odontogenic Differentiation.

本文引用的文献

1
A modified dentine infection model with fluorescent lipopolysaccharide and lipopolysaccharides sampling technique to compare XP-Endo finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation.一种改良的带荧光内毒素的牙本质感染模型及内毒素采样技术,用于比较 XP-Endo 锉和超声被动冲洗。
Int Endod J. 2022 Oct;55(10):1081-1090. doi: 10.1111/iej.13804. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Impact of agitation/activation strategies on the antibiofilm potential of sodium hypochlorite/etidronate mixture in vitro.体外研究不同激惹/激活策略对次氯酸钠/依替膦酸混合物抗生物膜潜力的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 23;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02222-1.
3
丙戊酸通过调节脂多糖诱导的人牙髓干细胞成牙本质分化来增强牙髓再生。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun 9;75(4):100850. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100850.
4
Bibliometric analysis of the GentleWave system: trends, collaborations, and research gaps.GentleWave系统的文献计量分析:趋势、合作与研究差距
Restor Dent Endod. 2025 May;50(2):e17. doi: 10.5395/rde.2025.50.e17. Epub 2025 May 12.
5
A Comparison Between Multisonic and Ultrasonic Irrigant Activation Techniques for Multispecies Biofilm Removal During Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review.根管消毒期间多声和超声冲洗液激活技术去除多种生物膜的比较:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Mar 21;17(3):e80938. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80938. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system provided by four active supplementary irrigation methods.四种主动附加冲洗法对根管系统的清洗与消毒。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 15;14(1):3795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53375-8.
7
Effect of eucalyptus oil on Streptococcus mutans and Enterococcus faecalis growth.桉叶油对变形链球菌和粪肠球菌生长的影响。
BDJ Open. 2023 Jul 6;9(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41405-023-00154-8.
Efficacy of GentleWave System and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation with Minimally Invasive and Conventional Instrumentation Technique against Enterococcus faecalis Lipoteichoic Acid in Infected Root Canals.
温和派系统和被动超声冲洗联合微创与常规器械技术对抗感染根管中粪肠球菌脂磷壁酸的疗效。
J Endod. 2022 Jun;48(6):768-774. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.01.021. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
4
In vitro efficacy of a non-instrumentation technique to remove intracanal multispecies biofilm.体外研究非仪器化技术去除根管内多物种生物膜的疗效。
Int Endod J. 2022 May;55(5):495-504. doi: 10.1111/iej.13706. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections.现状与未来方向:牙髓感染的微生物学。
Int Endod J. 2022 May;55 Suppl 3:512-530. doi: 10.1111/iej.13677. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
Influence of Bacterial Profiles in Cytokine and Clinical Features of Endodontic Disease.细菌谱对牙髓病细胞因子及临床特征的影响
J Endod. 2021 Aug;47(8):1265-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.026. Epub 2021 May 18.
7
Identification of Culturable and Nonculturable Microorganisms, Lipopolysaccharides, and Lipoteichoic Acids From Root Canals of Teeth With Endodontic Failure.从有根管治疗失败的牙齿的根管中鉴定可培养和不可培养的微生物、脂多糖和脂磷壁酸。
J Endod. 2021 Jul;47(7):1075-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
8
Investigation of microbial profile, levels of endotoxin and lipoteichoic acid in teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a clinical study.症状性不可复性牙髓炎患牙的微生物特征、内毒素和脂磷壁酸水平的调查:一项临床研究。
Int Endod J. 2021 Jan;54(1):46-60. doi: 10.1111/iej.13402. Epub 2020 Sep 27.
9
Quantitative Assessment of the Efficacy of Two Different Single-file Systems in Reducing the Bacterial load in Oval-Shaped Canals: A Clinical Study.两种不同单器械系统减少卵圆形根管内细菌负荷效果的定量评估:一项临床研究。
J Endod. 2020 Sep;46(9):1228-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
Evaluation of various irrigation activation systems to eliminate bacteria from the root canal system: A randomized controlled single blinded trial.评价各种冲洗激活系统从根管系统中清除细菌的效果:一项随机对照单盲试验。
J Dent. 2020 Aug;99:103412. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103412. Epub 2020 Jun 22.