Encarnacion Ramirez Manuel, Peralta Baez Ismael, Nurmukhametov Renat, Goncharov Efgeni, Efe Ibrahim E, Sufianov Albert, Ramirez Pena Issael
Department of Neurosurgery, RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Regional Alejandro Cabral, San Juan de la Maguana, Dominican Republic.
Front Med Technol. 2023 Jan 4;4:1055189. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.1055189. eCollection 2022.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is an often performed procedure in spine neurosurgery. These are often performed using an operating microscope (OM) for better illumination and visualization. But its use is limited to the surgeon and the assistant. There is difficulty in maneuvering long surgical instruments due to the limited space available. Exoscope (EX) has been used as an alternative to microscopes and endoscopes. We used an EX in patients undergoing ACDF for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
A prospective comparative trial was conducted to test the safety and usability of a low-cost EX compared to a conventional surgical binocular OM in ACDF. Twenty-six patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy symptoms were operated by ACDF assisted by the EX and OM between December 2021 and June 2022. The authors collected and compared data on operative time, intraoperative hemorrhage, hospital admission, and complications in the two groups.
There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in mean operative time, hospital stay, or postoperative complications. The average intraoperative blood loss was significantly more in the OM group. There were no surgical complications related to the use of the EX or OM. The comfort level, preoperative setup and intraoperative adjustment of position and angle of the EX were rated higher than the OM group. The image quality, depth perception, and illumination were rated as inferior to that of the OM. The low-cost EX was rated to be superior to that of the OM with regard to education and training purposes.
Our study showed that the low-cost EX appears to be a safe and effective alternative for OM-assisted ACDF with great comfort and ergonomics and serves as an essential tool for education and training purposes. However, some limitations of our EX included slightly inferior image quality and illumination when compared with the OM.
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是脊柱神经外科中经常实施的手术。这些手术通常使用手术显微镜(OM)以获得更好的照明和视野。但其使用仅限于外科医生和助手。由于可用空间有限,操作长手术器械存在困难。外视镜(EX)已被用作显微镜和内窥镜的替代设备。我们在患有脊髓型颈椎病的患者接受ACDF手术时使用了外视镜。
进行了一项前瞻性对照试验,以测试在ACDF手术中,与传统手术双目显微镜相比,低成本外视镜的安全性和可用性。2021年12月至2022年6月期间,26例有退行性颈椎病症状的患者在EX和OM辅助下接受了ACDF手术。作者收集并比较了两组患者的手术时间、术中出血、住院情况和并发症的数据。
两组在平均手术时间、住院时间或术后并发症方面无统计学显著差异。OM组的平均术中失血量明显更多。未出现与使用EX或OM相关的手术并发症。EX的舒适度、术前设置以及术中位置和角度调整的评分高于OM组。图像质量、深度感知和照明的评分低于OM组。就教育和培训目的而言,低成本EX的评分优于OM组。
我们的研究表明,低成本EX似乎是OM辅助ACDF手术的一种安全有效的替代方案,具有很高的舒适度和人体工程学特性,并且是教育和培训的重要工具。然而,我们使用的EX存在一些局限性,与OM相比图像质量和照明略差