运动成瘾:研究问题的叙述性综述。

Exercise addiction: A narrative overview of research issues.

机构信息

The Isadore and Ruth Kastin Chair for Brain Research, Department of Psychology, University of Ariel, Ariel, Israel.

Institute of Psychology, and Institute of Health Promotion and Sport Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2023 Jan 20;25(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/19585969.2023.2164841. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

This narrative overview summarises the work on exercise addiction (EA) over the past 12 years and exposes critical conceptual and methodological issues. More than 1000 articles exist on EA, conceptualised as uncontrolled training harming the individual. Still, EA has no clinical diagnosis criteria at this time. Research is increasing continuously, but it is stale in advancing knowledge. Scalar measurement and lack of differentiation between and exercise could be reasons for insufficient progress. Exercise addiction fits in the framework of behavioural addictions, but excessive exercise patterns also co-occur with other morbidities, including eating or body-image disorders. In these cases, exercise is instrumental; it functions to achieve a non-exercise-related goal. Therefore, it is essential to separate primary from secondary EA. Based on the interactional model, significant stress and capacity-exceeding ambitions fuel primary EA, while chief motives behind secondary EA embed body image dissatisfaction and eating disorders. Few reports exist on EA's brain mechanisms, which could delay its classification as a distinct psychiatric dysfunction. Treatment of EA involves cognitive-behavioural approaches, but we know little about their effectiveness. Conceptually focussed psychophysiological research and in-depth interviews, complementing scalar data, could answer several open questions in this widely studied but relatively stagnant scholastic field.

摘要

这篇叙述性综述总结了过去 12 年来关于运动成瘾(EA)的研究工作,揭示了关键的概念和方法学问题。目前已有 1000 多篇关于 EA 的文章,将其概念化为不受控制的训练对个体造成伤害。尽管如此,EA 目前还没有临床诊断标准。研究在不断增加,但在知识推进方面却乏善可陈。标度测量和缺乏区分运动和 运动可能是进展不足的原因。运动成瘾符合行为成瘾的框架,但过度的运动模式也与其他病态共病,包括饮食或身体形象障碍。在这些情况下,运动是工具性的;它是为了实现一个与运动无关的目标。因此,区分原发性和继发性 EA 至关重要。基于交互模型,显著的压力和超出能力的抱负推动原发性 EA,而继发性 EA 的主要动机则包括身体形象不满和饮食障碍。关于 EA 的大脑机制的报告很少,这可能会延迟其被归类为一种独特的精神功能障碍。EA 的治疗包括认知行为方法,但我们对其疗效知之甚少。以概念为重点的心理生理学研究和深入访谈,补充标度数据,可以回答这个广泛研究但相对停滞不前的学术领域的几个悬而未决的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d632/9869993/72ad3db8d16e/TDCN_A_2164841_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索