• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种通过简单的感染确认测试对传染病或大流行的流行率和严重程度进行早期估计的统计模型。

A statistical model for early estimation of the prevalence and severity of an epidemic or pandemic from simple tests for infection confirmation.

机构信息

Department of Software and Information Systems Engineering, Ben Gurion University; Beer Sheva, Israel.

Department of Information Systems, University of Haifa; Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280874. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0280874
PMID:36701400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879391/
Abstract

Epidemics and pandemics require an early estimate of the cumulative infection prevalence, sometimes referred to as the infection "Iceberg," whose tip are the known cases. Accurate early estimates support better disease monitoring, more accurate estimation of infection fatality rate, and an assessment of the risks from asymptomatic individuals. We find the Pivot group, the population sub-group with the highest probability of being detected and confirmed as positively infected. We differentiate infection susceptibility, assumed to be almost uniform across all population sub-groups at this early stage, from the probability of being confirmed positive. The latter is often related to the likelihood of developing symptoms and complications, which differs between sub-groups (e.g., by age, in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic). A key assumption in our method is the almost-random subgroup infection assumption: The risk of initial infection is either almost uniform across all population sub-groups or not higher in the Pivot sub-group. We then present an algorithm that, using the lift value of the pivot sub-group, finds a lower bound for the cumulative infection prevalence in the population, that is, gives a lower bound on the size of the entire infection "Iceberg." We demonstrate our method by applying it to the case of the COVID-19 pandemic. We use UK and Spain serological surveys of COVID-19 in its first year to demonstrate that the data are consistent with our key assumption, at least for the chosen pivot sub-group. Overall, we applied our methods to nine countries or large regions whose data, mainly during the early COVID-19 pandemic phase, were available: Spain, the UK at two different time points, New York State, New York City, Italy, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, and Israel. We established an estimate of the lower bound of the cumulative infection prevalence for each of them. We have also computed the corresponding upper bounds on the infection fatality rates in each country or region. Using our methodology, we have demonstrated that estimating a lower bound for an epidemic's infection prevalence at its early phase is feasible and that the assumptions underlying that estimate are valid. Our methodology is especially helpful when serological data are not yet available to gain an initial assessment on the prevalence scale, and more so for pandemics with an asymptomatic transmission, as is the case with Covid-19.

摘要

疫情和大流行需要对累计感染率进行早期估计,有时也被称为感染的“冰山一角”,其尖端是已知的病例。准确的早期估计有助于更好地监测疾病,更准确地估计感染死亡率,并评估无症状个体的风险。我们找到了 Pivot 组,这是最有可能被发现和确认为阳性感染的人群亚组。我们区分了感染易感性,在早期阶段,假设所有人群亚组的感染易感性几乎相同,而与被确认为阳性的概率不同。后者通常与症状和并发症的发生概率有关,而这些概率在亚组之间是不同的(例如,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,按年龄划分)。我们的方法中的一个关键假设是几乎随机的亚组感染假设:初始感染的风险在所有人群亚组中几乎相同,或者在 Pivot 亚组中没有更高。然后,我们提出了一种算法,该算法使用 Pivot 亚组的提升值,找到了人群中累计感染率的下限,即整个感染“冰山一角”的大小下限。我们通过将其应用于 COVID-19 大流行的案例来演示我们的方法。我们使用英国和西班牙在 COVID-19 大流行第一年进行的血清学调查来证明,数据至少与我们选择的 Pivot 亚组的关键假设是一致的。总体而言,我们将我们的方法应用于九个国家或地区,这些国家或地区的数据(主要是在 COVID-19 大流行的早期阶段)可用:西班牙、英国在两个不同的时间点、纽约州、纽约市、意大利、挪威、瑞典、比利时和以色列。我们为它们中的每一个都估计了累计感染率下限。我们还计算了每个国家或地区感染死亡率的相应上限。使用我们的方法,我们已经证明,在疫情早期阶段估计疫情感染率的下限是可行的,并且该估计所依据的假设是有效的。当还没有血清学数据来获得流行规模的初步评估时,我们的方法特别有帮助,对于像 COVID-19 这样具有无症状传播的大流行更是如此。

相似文献

1
A statistical model for early estimation of the prevalence and severity of an epidemic or pandemic from simple tests for infection confirmation.一种通过简单的感染确认测试对传染病或大流行的流行率和严重程度进行早期估计的统计模型。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280874. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics in Denmark, February through October 2020: Nature of the past epidemic and how it may develop in the future.2020 年 2 月至 10 月期间丹麦的 SARS-CoV-2 感染动态:过去疫情的性质及其未来可能的发展。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 9;16(4):e0249733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249733. eCollection 2021.
4
Estimating the infection-fatality risk of SARS-CoV-2 in New York City during the spring 2020 pandemic wave: a model-based analysis.在 2020 年春季大流行期间估计 SARS-CoV-2 在纽约市的感染病死率:基于模型的分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):203-212. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30769-6. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
5
Estimating global, regional, and national daily and cumulative infections with SARS-CoV-2 through Nov 14, 2021: a statistical analysis.估算 2021 年 11 月 14 日前全球、区域和国家的 SARS-CoV-2 日感染和累计感染人数:一项统计分析。
Lancet. 2022 Jun 25;399(10344):2351-2380. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00484-6. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
7
Global age-sex-specific mortality, life expectancy, and population estimates in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1950-2021, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.204 个国家和地区及 811 个次国家级行政单位 1950 年至 2021 年的全球年龄、性别特异性死亡率、预期寿命和人口估计,以及 COVID-19 大流行的影响:2021 年全球疾病负担研究的综合人口分析。
Lancet. 2024 May 18;403(10440):1989-2056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00476-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
8
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
9
Modelling the Transmission Dynamics of COVID-19 in Six High-Burden Countries.建模 COVID-19 在六个高负担国家的传播动态。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 May 27;2021:5089184. doi: 10.1155/2021/5089184. eCollection 2021.
10
Pseudo-likelihood based logistic regression for estimating COVID-19 infection and case fatality rates by gender, race, and age in California.基于伪似然的逻辑回归估计加利福尼亚州按性别、种族和年龄划分的 COVID-19 感染率和病死率。
Epidemics. 2020 Dec;33:100418. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2020.100418. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing individual risk and the latent transmission of COVID-19 in a population with an interaction-driven temporal model.评估具有相互作用驱动的时变模型的人群中 COVID-19 的个体风险和潜在传播。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 10;13(1):12955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39817-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating the extent of asymptomatic COVID-19 and its potential for community transmission: Systematic review and meta-analysis.评估无症状新冠病毒感染的程度及其社区传播潜力:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2020 Dec 31;5(4):223-234. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0030. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
The Impact of US County-Level Factors on COVID-19 Morbidity and Mortality.美国县级因素对 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的影响。
J Urban Health. 2022 Jun;99(3):562-570. doi: 10.1007/s11524-021-00601-7. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
A multi-layer model for the early detection of COVID-19.用于 COVID-19 早期检测的多层模型。
J R Soc Interface. 2021 Aug;18(181):20210284. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0284. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
How to interpret and use COVID-19 serology and immunology tests.如何解读和使用 COVID-19 血清学和免疫学检测
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jul;27(7):981-986. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 8.
5
Quantifying asymptomatic infection and transmission of COVID-19 in New York City using observed cases, serology, and testing capacity.利用观察病例、血清学和检测能力量化纽约市 COVID-19 的无症状感染和传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2019716118.
6
SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing for estimating COVID-19 prevalence in the population.SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测在人群中估算 COVID-19 患病率。
Cell Rep Med. 2021 Feb 16;2(2):100191. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100191. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
7
The Proportion of SARS-CoV-2 Infections That Are Asymptomatic : A Systematic Review.无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的比例:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 May;174(5):655-662. doi: 10.7326/M20-6976. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
8
Longitudinal observation and decline of neutralizing antibody responses in the three months following SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans.人类感染 SARS-CoV-2 后三个月内中和抗体反应的纵向观察和下降。
Nat Microbiol. 2020 Dec;5(12):1598-1607. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-00813-8. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
Simulation of pooled-sample analysis strategies for COVID-19 mass testing.模拟 COVID-19 大规模检测的汇总样本分析策略。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Sep 1;98(9):590-598. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.257188. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
10
Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in six care homes in London, April 2020.2020年4月对伦敦六家养老院中新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情的调查。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep;26:100533. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100533. Epub 2020 Sep 9.