Nuyts Nathalie, Friese Carrie
Sociology Department, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Soc Cult Geogr. 2021 Apr 6;24(1):11-30. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2021.1901976. eCollection 2023.
Communication between scientists and animal technicians is considered important for creating a 'culture of care' in facilities that use animals in scientific research. For example, the Brown report, which investigated alleged failures of animal care at Imperial College London, noted the physical and social separation between animal technicians and scientists as a problem that delimited a culture of care. This paper seeks to better understand the communicative relationships between scientists and animal technicians in this context. We conducted a survey of scientists working in the UK who use animals in their research (n = 230), asking who they spoke with about various aspects related to using animals in research. We found that scientists communicated with technicians about operational issues, while they spoke with other scientists about experimental design as well as moral questions and concerns. We probe the meaning of these communicative relationships using narrative analysis of semi-structured, qualitative interviews conducted with consenting survey respondents (n = 14). Analytically, this paper seeks to bridge social network analysis with geographies of care through a shared concern with relations of power.
科学家与动物技术人员之间的沟通被认为对于在科学研究中使用动物的机构营造一种“关爱文化”至关重要。例如,调查伦敦帝国理工学院动物护理方面所宣称失误的《布朗报告》指出,动物技术人员与科学家之间在物理和社交上的隔离是界定关爱文化的一个问题。本文旨在更好地理解在这种背景下科学家与动物技术人员之间的交流关系。我们对在英国从事研究且在研究中使用动物的科学家开展了一项调查(n = 230),询问他们就研究中使用动物的各个方面与谁进行了交流。我们发现,科学家与技术人员就操作问题进行沟通,而他们与其他科学家就实验设计以及道德问题和担忧进行交流。我们通过对经同意的调查受访者(n = 14)进行半结构化定性访谈的叙事分析来探究这些交流关系的意义。从分析角度来看,本文试图通过对权力关系的共同关注,将社会网络分析与关爱地理学联系起来。