• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对治疗负担优先级的理解与慢性心力衰竭患者体验的一致性:名义小组技术咨询

Alignment of Doctors' Understanding of Treatment Burden Priorities and Chronic Heart Failure Patients' Experiences: A Nominal Group Technique Consultation.

作者信息

Cardona Magnolia, Sav Adem, Michaleff Zoe A, Thomas Sarah T, Dobler Claudia C

机构信息

Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.

Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 20;17:153-165. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S385911. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S385911
PMID:36713974
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9880013/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To identify and rank areas of treatment burden in chronic heart failure (CHF), including solutions, that should be discussed during the clinical encounter from a patient, and doctors' perspective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with CHF and clinicians managing heart failure were invited. Nominal group technique sessions held either face to face or online in 2021-2022, with individual identification of priorities and voting on ranking.

RESULTS

Four patient groups (N=22) and one doctor group (N=5) were held. For patients with heart failure, in descending order of priority Doctor-patient communication, Inefficiencies of the healthcare system, Healthcare access issues, Cost implications of treatment, Psychosocial impacts on patients and their families, and Impact of treatment work were the most important treatment burdens. Priorities independently identified by the doctors aligned with the patients' but ranking differed. Patient solutions ranged from involvement of nurses or pharmacists to enhance understanding of discharge planning, through to linkage between health information systems, and maintaining strong family or social support networks. Doctors' solutions covered timing medicines with activities of daily living, patient education on the importance of compliance, medication reviews to overcome clinical inertia, and routine clinical audits.

CONCLUSION

The top treatment burden priorities for CHF patients were related to interaction with clinicians and health system inefficiencies, whereas doctors were generally aware of patients' treatment burden but tended to focus on the complexity of the direct treatment work. Addressing the priority issues identified here can commence with clinicians becoming aware of the issues that matter to patients and proactively discussing feasible immediate and longer-term solutions during clinical encounters.

摘要

目的

从患者和医生的角度识别并排序慢性心力衰竭(CHF)治疗负担的领域,包括在临床会诊期间应讨论的解决方案。

患者与方法

邀请了CHF患者和管理心力衰竭的临床医生。2021年至2022年以面对面或在线方式举行了名义小组技术会议,分别确定优先事项并进行排名投票。

结果

共举行了四组患者会议(N = 22)和一组医生会议(N = 5)。对于心力衰竭患者,按优先顺序排列,医患沟通、医疗系统效率低下、医疗服务可及性问题、治疗费用影响、对患者及其家庭的心理社会影响以及治疗工作的影响是最重要的治疗负担。医生独立确定的优先事项与患者一致,但排名不同。患者提出的解决方案包括让护士或药剂师参与以增强对出院计划的理解,直至健康信息系统之间的联系,以及维持强大的家庭或社会支持网络。医生提出的解决方案包括使服药时间与日常生活活动相协调、对患者进行依从性重要性的教育、进行药物审查以克服临床惰性以及开展常规临床审计。

结论

CHF患者最重要的治疗负担优先事项与与临床医生的互动及医疗系统效率低下有关,而医生通常了解患者的治疗负担,但倾向于关注直接治疗工作的复杂性。解决此处确定的优先问题可以从临床医生意识到对患者重要的问题并在临床会诊期间积极讨论可行的近期和长期解决方案开始。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a4e/9880013/a52fa5dd8b73/PPA-17-153-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a4e/9880013/a65cdb61ee39/PPA-17-153-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a4e/9880013/a52fa5dd8b73/PPA-17-153-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a4e/9880013/a65cdb61ee39/PPA-17-153-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a4e/9880013/a52fa5dd8b73/PPA-17-153-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Alignment of Doctors' Understanding of Treatment Burden Priorities and Chronic Heart Failure Patients' Experiences: A Nominal Group Technique Consultation.医生对治疗负担优先级的理解与慢性心力衰竭患者体验的一致性:名义小组技术咨询
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Jan 20;17:153-165. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S385911. eCollection 2023.
2
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
3
Patient and physician perspectives on treatment burden in end-stage kidney disease: a nominal group technique study.终末期肾病患者和医生对治疗负担的看法:名义小组技术研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 5;12(12):e064447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064447.
4
5
The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.屏幕对屏幕咨询与面对面咨询对医患沟通的影响:一项针对模拟患者的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 20;19(12):e421. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8033.
6
No Easy Talk: A Mixed Methods Study of Doctor Reported Barriers to Conducting Effective End-of-Life Conversations with Diverse Patients.艰难的谈话:一项关于医生报告的与不同患者进行有效临终谈话障碍的混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 22;10(4):e0122321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122321. eCollection 2015.
7
Doctors' assistants' views of case management to improve chronic heart failure care in general practice: a qualitative study.医生助理对改善全科医疗中慢性心力衰竭护理的病例管理的看法:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Apr;65(4):799-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04934.x. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
8
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
9
What factors shape doctors' trustworthiness? Patients' perspectives in the context of hypertension care in rural Tanzania.哪些因素塑造了医生的可信度?坦桑尼亚农村地区高血压护理背景下的患者观点。
Rural Remote Health. 2020 Aug;20(3):5826. doi: 10.22605/RRH5826. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
10
Notable gaps between patients' and physicians' perspectives on communication and disease management in Japan: multifaceted analyses of the global Ulcerative Colitis Narrative Survey for further optimal care.日本患者与医生在沟通及疾病管理方面观点的显著差距:对全球溃疡性结肠炎叙事性调查的多方面分析以实现更优化的护理
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 14;15:17562848221095372. doi: 10.1177/17562848221095372. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Rewriting the heart failure pillars toward less burdensome heart failure care pathways.重新规划心力衰竭的支柱,以实现负担较小的心力衰竭护理路径。
Br J Cardiol. 2024 Feb 20;31(1):005. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2024.005. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring barriers and solutions to consumer involvement in health service research using a nominal group technique.运用名义群体技术探索消费者参与卫生服务研究的障碍及解决方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jul 11;10(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00604-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility, satisfaction, acceptability and safety of telehealth for First Nations and culturally and linguistically diverse people: a scoping review.远程医疗在第一民族和文化及语言多样化人群中的可行性、满意度、可接受性和安全性:范围综述。
Public Health. 2022 Jun;207:119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 May 28.
2
Barriers to Self-care Among Patients with Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study.心力衰竭患者自我护理的障碍:一项定性研究。
J Caring Sci. 2020 Oct 20;10(4):196-204. doi: 10.34172/jcs.2020.026. eCollection 2021 Nov.
3
Patient-centered Outcomes in HFrEF Following a Worsening Heart Failure Event: A Survey Analysis.
射血分数降低心衰(HFrEF)恶化后以患者为中心的结局:一项调查分析。
J Card Fail. 2021 Aug;27(8):877-887. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.05.017.
4
Do chronic heart failure symptoms interact with burden of treatment? Qualitative literature systematic review.慢性心力衰竭症状是否与治疗负担相互作用?定性文献系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):e047060. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047060.
5
Determinants of acceptance of patients with heart failure and their informal caregivers regarding an interactive decision-making system: a qualitative study.心力衰竭患者及其非专业照护者对互动式决策系统的接受度的决定因素:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e046160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046160.
6
Caregivers of Patients with Heart Failure: Burden and the Determinants of Health-Related Quality of Life.心力衰竭患者的照料者:负担及健康相关生活质量的决定因素
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 May 26;15:1153-1164. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S297816. eCollection 2021.
7
Burden of treatment in patients with chronic heart failure - A cross-sectional study.慢性心力衰竭患者的治疗负担 - 一项横断面研究。
Heart Lung. 2021 May-Jun;50(3):369-374. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
A Systematic Review of Medical Costs Associated with Heart Failure in the USA (2014-2020).美国与心力衰竭相关的医疗费用的系统评价(2014-2020 年)。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Nov;38(11):1219-1236. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00952-0.
9
Asymptomatic Left Ventricle Systolic Dysfunction.无症状性左心室收缩功能障碍
Eur Cardiol. 2020 Apr 4;15:e13. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.14. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
A systematic literature review looking for the definition of treatment burden.一项旨在寻找治疗负担定义的系统性文献综述。
Heliyon. 2020 Apr 7;6(4):e03641. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03641. eCollection 2020 Apr.