• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于机器学习的方法,利用医院就诊时的行政数据和健康社会决定因素来支持紧急脑卒中分诊:回顾性研究。

A Machine Learning Approach to Support Urgent Stroke Triage Using Administrative Data and Social Determinants of Health at Hospital Presentation: Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Information Systems & Business Analytics, College of Business, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.

Department of Information Systems and Analytics, Leavey School of Business, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 30;25:e36477. doi: 10.2196/36477.

DOI:10.2196/36477
PMID:36716097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9926350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The key to effective stroke management is timely diagnosis and triage. Machine learning (ML) methods developed to assist in detecting stroke have focused on interpreting detailed clinical data such as clinical notes and diagnostic imaging results. However, such information may not be readily available when patients are initially triaged, particularly in rural and underserved communities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop an ML stroke prediction algorithm based on data widely available at the time of patients' hospital presentations and assess the added value of social determinants of health (SDoH) in stroke prediction.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of the emergency department and hospitalization records from 2012 to 2014 from all the acute care hospitals in the state of Florida, merged with the SDoH data from the American Community Survey. A case-control design was adopted to construct stroke and stroke mimic cohorts. We compared the algorithm performance and feature importance measures of the ML models (ie, gradient boosting machine and random forest) with those of the logistic regression model based on 3 sets of predictors. To provide insights into the prediction and ultimately assist care providers in decision-making, we used TreeSHAP for tree-based ML models to explain the stroke prediction.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 143,203 hospital visits of unique patients, and it was confirmed based on the principal diagnosis at discharge that 73% (n=104,662) of these patients had a stroke. The approach proposed in this study has high sensitivity and is particularly effective at reducing the misdiagnosis of dangerous stroke chameleons (false-negative rate <4%). ML classifiers consistently outperformed the benchmark logistic regression in all 3 input combinations. We found significant consistency across the models in the features that explain their performance. The most important features are age, the number of chronic conditions on admission, and primary payer (eg, Medicare or private insurance). Although both the individual- and community-level SDoH features helped improve the predictive performance of the models, the inclusion of the individual-level SDoH features led to a much larger improvement (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased from 0.694 to 0.823) than the inclusion of the community-level SDoH features (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve increased from 0.823 to 0.829).

CONCLUSIONS

Using data widely available at the time of patients' hospital presentations, we developed a stroke prediction model with high sensitivity and reasonable specificity. The prediction algorithm uses variables that are routinely collected by providers and payers and might be useful in underresourced hospitals with limited availability of sensitive diagnostic tools or incomplete data-gathering capabilities.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/abe63f037d48/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/ea9600f4296b/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/0fd93e54b57c/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/a43633d31066/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/0f03e76ae8ae/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/abe63f037d48/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/ea9600f4296b/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/0fd93e54b57c/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/a43633d31066/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/0f03e76ae8ae/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5cd/9926350/abe63f037d48/jmir_v25i1e36477_fig5.jpg
摘要

背景

有效管理中风的关键在于及时诊断和分诊。为协助检测中风而开发的机器学习(ML)方法侧重于解释详细的临床数据,如临床记录和诊断成像结果。然而,当患者最初分诊时,这些信息可能不容易获得,特别是在农村和服务不足的社区。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种基于患者就诊时广泛可用的数据的 ML 中风预测算法,并评估社会决定因素(SDoH)在中风预测中的附加值。

方法

我们对 2012 年至 2014 年佛罗里达州所有急症护理医院的急诊室和住院记录进行了回顾性研究,并与美国社区调查中的 SDoH 数据合并。采用病例对照设计构建中风和中风模拟队列。我们比较了基于 3 组预测因子的 ML 模型(即梯度提升机和随机森林)与逻辑回归模型的算法性能和特征重要性度量。为了深入了解预测并最终协助护理人员做出决策,我们使用 TreeSHAP 为基于树的 ML 模型解释中风预测。

结果

我们的分析包括 143203 名独特患者的医院就诊,根据出院时的主要诊断确认其中 73%(n=104662)的患者患有中风。本研究提出的方法具有较高的灵敏度,特别有效地减少了危险的中风伪装者的误诊(假阴性率<4%)。在所有 3 种输入组合中,ML 分类器始终优于基准逻辑回归。我们发现,在解释其性能的特征方面,模型之间具有显著的一致性。最重要的特征是年龄、入院时的慢性疾病数量和主要支付者(例如,医疗保险或私人保险)。虽然个体和社区层面的 SDoH 特征都有助于提高模型的预测性能,但个体层面的 SDoH 特征的纳入导致了更大的改善(接收者操作特征曲线下面积从 0.694 增加到 0.823),而社区层面的 SDoH 特征的纳入仅导致了较小的改善(接收者操作特征曲线下面积从 0.823 增加到 0.829)。

结论

使用患者就诊时广泛可用的数据,我们开发了一种具有高灵敏度和合理特异性的中风预测模型。该预测算法使用提供者和支付者常规收集的变量,并且可能对资源有限的医院有用,这些医院的敏感诊断工具可用性有限或数据收集能力不完整。

相似文献

1
A Machine Learning Approach to Support Urgent Stroke Triage Using Administrative Data and Social Determinants of Health at Hospital Presentation: Retrospective Study.一种基于机器学习的方法,利用医院就诊时的行政数据和健康社会决定因素来支持紧急脑卒中分诊:回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 30;25:e36477. doi: 10.2196/36477.
2
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
3
Advancing Emergency Department Triage Prediction With Machine Learning to Optimize Triage for Abdominal Pain Surgery Patients.利用机器学习提高急诊科分诊预测能力,优化腹痛手术患者的分诊。
Surg Innov. 2024 Dec;31(6):583-597. doi: 10.1177/15533506241273449. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage.基于机器学习的急诊科分诊中儿童临床结局预测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6937.
5
Integrating Social Determinants of Health in Machine Learning-Driven Decision Support for Diabetes Case Management: Protocol for a Sequential Mixed Methods Study.将健康的社会决定因素纳入机器学习驱动的糖尿病病例管理决策支持中:一项序贯混合方法研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 25;13:e56049. doi: 10.2196/56049.
6
Developing a stroke alert trigger for clinical decision support at emergency triage using machine learning.利用机器学习为急诊分诊开发卒中预警触发器用于临床决策支持。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Aug;152:104505. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104505. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
Machine learning models predict triage levels, massive transfusion protocol activation, and mortality in trauma utilizing patients hemodynamics on admission.机器学习模型利用创伤患者入院时的血流动力学来预测分诊级别、大量输血方案的激活和死亡率。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Sep;179:108880. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108880. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
8
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
9
A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Need for Hospitalization for Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation at the Time of Emergency Department Triage.一种机器学习方法,用于预测儿科哮喘急诊分诊时需要住院治疗的情况。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(12):1463-1470. doi: 10.1111/acem.13655. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
10
Machine Learning on Medicare Claims Poorly Predicts the Individual Risk of 30-Day Unplanned Readmission After Total Joint Arthroplasty, Yet Uncovers Interesting Population-level Associations With Annual Procedure Volumes.机器学习在医疗保险索赔中预测全膝关节置换术后 30 天内非计划性再入院的个体风险效果不佳,但却揭示了与年度手术量有关的有趣的人群水平关联。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Sep 1;481(9):1745-1759. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002705. Epub 2023 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Diagnostic Prediction Model for Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Using Multimodal MRI and PET/CT: A Study Protocol.使用多模态MRI和PET/CT开发急性大血管闭塞性卒中后认知障碍的诊断预测模型:一项研究方案
Brain Behav. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70613. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70613.
2
Predicting stroke occurrences: a stacked machine learning approach with feature selection and data preprocessing.预测中风发生:具有特征选择和数据预处理的堆叠机器学习方法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2024 Oct 15;25(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12859-024-05866-8.
3
Development, assessment and validation of a novel nomogram model for predicting stroke mimics in stroke center:A single-center observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2022 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
Stroke Outcome Measurements From Electronic Medical Records: Cross-sectional Study on the Effectiveness of Neural and Nonneural Classifiers.来自电子病历的中风结局测量:神经和非神经分类器有效性的横断面研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 1;9(11):e29120. doi: 10.2196/29120.
3
Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning for Identifying Incident Stroke From Electronic Health Records: Algorithm Development and Validation.
一种用于预测卒中中心类卒中的新型列线图模型的开发、评估与验证:一项单中心观察性研究
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 27;10(19):e38602. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38602. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing the Functioning of Emergency Departments; a Systematic Review of Current Solutions.人工智能在优化急诊科运作中的应用;当前解决方案的系统综述
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 27;12(1):e22. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v12i1.2110. eCollection 2024.
自然语言处理和机器学习在电子健康记录中识别中风事件:算法开发和验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 8;23(3):e22951. doi: 10.2196/22951.
4
Different Stroke Scales; Which Scale or Scales Should Be Used?不同的卒中量表;应该使用哪种或哪些量表?
Caspian J Intern Med. 2021 Winter;12(1):1-21. doi: 10.22088/cjim.12.1.1.
5
Comparison of eight prehospital stroke scales to detect intracranial large-vessel occlusion in suspected stroke (PRESTO): a prospective observational study.比较 8 种院前卒中量表对疑似卒中患者颅内大血管闭塞的检出效果(PRESTO):一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Mar;20(3):213-221. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30439-7. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
6
Comparison of Prehospital Scales for Predicting Large Anterior Vessel Occlusion in the Ambulance Setting.院前量表在救护车环境中预测大血管前闭塞的比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Feb 1;78(2):157-164. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4418.
7
Social determinants of health in electronic health records and their impact on analysis and risk prediction: A systematic review.电子健康记录中的健康社会决定因素及其对分析和风险预测的影响:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1764-1773. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa143.
8
Machine Learning to Predict Mortality and Critical Events in a Cohort of Patients With COVID-19 in New York City: Model Development and Validation.机器学习预测纽约市新冠肺炎患者队列中的死亡率和危急事件:模型开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 6;22(11):e24018. doi: 10.2196/24018.
9
Using artificial intelligence for improving stroke diagnosis in emergency departments: a practical framework.利用人工智能改善急诊科的中风诊断:一个实用框架。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Aug 25;13:1756286420938962. doi: 10.1177/1756286420938962. eCollection 2020.
10
Comprehensive Telestroke Network to Optimize Health Care Delivery for Cerebrovascular Diseases: Algorithm Development.优化脑血管疾病医疗服务的综合远程卒中网络:算法开发
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 27;22(7):e18058. doi: 10.2196/18058.