Yang Wenchun, Chan Angel, Gagarina Natalia
School of Foreign Studies, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics (ZAS), Berlin, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 17;13:1059895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059895. eCollection 2022.
Studies have documented that child experiences such as external/environmental factors as well as internal factors jointly affect acquisition outcomes in child language. Thus far, the findings have been heavily skewed toward Indo-European languages and children in the Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic (WEIRD) societies. By contrast, this study features an understudied minority language Kam, and a group of so-called left-behind children in China growing up in a unique social-communicative environment.
Fifty-five bilingual children aged 5-9 acquiring Kam as home language were assessed using the Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives (LITMUS MAIN). Twenty-three "two parents-left" children (mean age = 6;8, range: 5;0-9;2) remained in rural areas while both parents went to cities for employment, and they were raised by their grandparents. Thirty-two were "one parent-left" peers (mean age = 7;3, range: 5;0-9;3) who also resided in rural areas but were raised by one parent. Oral narrative texts were analysed for macrostructure based on story structure (SS), story complexity (SC) and internal state terms (IS). The study examined whether and how narrative production is predicted by internal factors such as chronological age and linguistic proficiency of a child and an external factor such as left-behind experience. Four measures were scored as outcome measures: SS, SC, IS type, IS token. Four measures were taken as predictors: chronological age, left-behind experience, scores in a lexical production task, and scores in a sentence repetition task tapping expressive morphosyntactic competence.
Results showed that left-behind experience consistently predicted all four outcome measures, where the "two parents-left" children scored significantly lower than their "one parent-left" peers. Expressive vocabulary scores predicted three measures: SS, SC, and IS Token. Expressive morphosyntactic scores predicted SS and SC. Age, by contrast, did not predict any outcome measure.
These findings suggested that being left-behind by both parents may be a negative prognostic indicator for the development and maintenance of heritage language abilities in ethnic minority children. We further discussed the conceptual significance of what it means for a child to be left-behind, by relating to more basic external factors in language development, including caregiver educational level, and amount of home language and literacy support by the caretakers.
研究表明,儿童经历,如外部/环境因素以及内部因素,共同影响儿童语言习得成果。迄今为止,研究结果严重偏向印欧语系语言以及西方、受过教育、工业化、富裕和民主(WEIRD)社会中的儿童。相比之下,本研究以一种研究较少的少数民族语言——侗语为特色,并聚焦于在中国独特的社会交际环境中成长的一群所谓留守儿童。
使用多语言叙事评估工具(LITMUS MAIN)对55名以侗语为母语的5至9岁双语儿童进行评估。23名“双亲外出”儿童(平均年龄=6岁8个月,范围:5岁0个月至9岁2个月)留在农村,父母双方均前往城市就业,由祖父母抚养。32名是“单亲外出”儿童(平均年龄=7岁3个月,范围:5岁0个月至9岁3个月),他们也居住在农村,但由父母一方抚养。基于故事结构(SS)、故事复杂性(SC)和内部状态词(IS)对口头叙事文本的宏观结构进行分析。本研究考察了儿童的年龄和语言能力等内部因素以及留守儿童经历等外部因素是否以及如何预测叙事产出。四项指标作为结果指标进行评分:SS、SC、IS类型、IS词元。四项指标作为预测指标:年龄、留守儿童经历、词汇产出任务得分以及衡量表达形态句法能力的句子重复任务得分。
结果表明,留守儿童经历始终能预测所有四项结果指标,“双亲外出”儿童的得分显著低于“单亲外出”儿童。表达性词汇得分能预测三项指标:SS、SC和IS词元。表达形态句法得分能预测SS和SC。相比之下,年龄不能预测任何结果指标。
这些发现表明,父母双方都外出务工可能是少数民族儿童母语能力发展和维持的一个负面预后指标。我们通过联系语言发展中更基本的外部因素,包括照顾者的教育水平以及照顾者提供的母语和读写支持量,进一步讨论了儿童留守意味着什么的概念意义。