Suppr超能文献

超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞在接受开腹根治性子宫切除术的早期宫颈癌患者中的效果:一项双盲随机对照试验。

The efficiency of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in early cervical cancer patients undergoing laparotomic radical hysterectomy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zhou Ling, Wang Shan, Liu Chunmei, Yan Tingting, Song Youping, Shu Shuhua, Wang Sheng, Wei Xin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2023 Jan 23;9:1039629. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1039629. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

AIMS

We aim to compare the efficiency of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in patients undergoing laparotomic radical hysterectomy because only a few studies are reported exploring this matter.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trail, 154 eligible patients were randomly allocated into ESPB group [ESPB + patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA)] and TAPB group (TAPB + PCIA) at 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) score at rest state at 12 h.

RESULTS

We found that ESPB group was associated with the lower VAS scores at rest and cough state than TAPB group at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively ( < 0.05). Less analgesic consumption and sufentanil consumption in PCIA pump were found in the ESPB group ( < 0.05). Moreover, ESPB group was followed by fewer rescue analgesia requirements, less rescue analgesic consumption, less adverse reactions, and higher analgesia satisfaction ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found that ESPB had advantages on analgesic effect and opioids consumption. In the future, more studies were needed to confirm our findings. https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx, identifier: ChiCTR2100044240.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)与腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)在接受剖腹根治性子宫切除术患者中的效果,因为仅有少数研究探讨了这一问题。

方法

在这项随机对照试验中,154例符合条件的患者按1:1比例随机分为ESPB组[ESPB + 患者自控静脉镇痛(PCIA)]和TAPB组(TAPB + PCIA)。主要结局指标为术后12小时静息状态下的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。

结果

我们发现,ESPB组在术后2、4、6、12和24小时的静息和咳嗽状态下的VAS评分均低于TAPB组(P < 0.05)。ESPB组PCIA泵中的镇痛药物和舒芬太尼消耗量更少(P < 0.05)。此外,ESPB组的补救镇痛需求更少、补救镇痛药物消耗量更少、不良反应更少且镇痛满意度更高(P < 0.05)。

结论

我们的研究发现ESPB在镇痛效果和阿片类药物消耗方面具有优势。未来,需要更多研究来证实我们的发现。https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx,标识符:ChiCTR2100044240

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef47/9899845/2c853faf8dee/fsurg-09-1039629-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验