Bensch Hanna M, Tolf Conny, Waldenström Jonas, Lundin Daniel, Zöttl Markus
Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Centre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems (EEMIS), Linnaeus University, 391 82, Kalmar, Sweden.
Kalahari Research Centre, Kuruman River Reserve, Van Zylsrus, South Africa.
Anim Microbiome. 2023 Feb 10;5(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s42523-023-00231-1.
In mammals, the gut microbiota has important effects on the health of their hosts. Recent research highlights that animal populations that live in captivity often differ in microbiota diversity and composition from wild populations. However, the changes that may occur when animals move to captivity remain difficult to predict and factors generating such differences are poorly understood. Here we compare the bacterial gut microbiota of wild and captive Damaraland mole-rats (Fukomys damarensis) originating from a population in the southern Kalahari Desert to characterise the changes of the gut microbiota that occur from one generation to the next generation in a long-lived, social rodent species.
We found a clear divergence in the composition of the gut microbiota of captive and wild Damaraland mole-rats. Although the dominating higher-rank bacterial taxa were the same in the two groups, captive animals had an increased ratio of relative abundance of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes compared to wild animals. The Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) that were strongly associated with wild animals were commonly members of the same bacterial families as those strongly associated with captive animals. Captive animals had much higher ASV richness compared to wild-caught animals, explained by an increased richness within the Firmicutes.
We found that the gut microbiota of captive hosts differs substantially from the gut microbiota composition of wild hosts. The largest differences between the two groups were found in shifts in relative abundances and diversity of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.
在哺乳动物中,肠道微生物群对宿主健康具有重要影响。近期研究表明,圈养动物群体的微生物群多样性和组成往往与野生群体不同。然而,动物转入圈养时可能发生的变化仍难以预测,且导致这种差异的因素也知之甚少。在此,我们比较了来自喀拉哈里沙漠南部一个种群的野生和圈养达马拉兰鼹形鼠(南非裸鼹鼠)的肠道细菌微生物群,以描述在一种长寿的群居啮齿动物物种中,肠道微生物群从一代到下一代所发生的变化。
我们发现圈养和野生达马拉兰鼹形鼠的肠道微生物群组成存在明显差异。虽然两组中占主导地位的高级细菌类群相同,但与野生动物相比,圈养动物中厚壁菌门与拟杆菌门的相对丰度比值有所增加。与野生动物密切相关的扩增子序列变体(ASV)通常与与圈养动物密切相关的细菌属于同一科。与野生捕获动物相比,圈养动物的ASV丰富度要高得多,这可以通过厚壁菌门内丰富度的增加来解释。
我们发现圈养宿主的肠道微生物群与野生宿主的肠道微生物群组成存在显著差异。两组之间最大的差异在于厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门的相对丰度和多样性的变化。