Suppr超能文献

将文化和语言多样性纳入 COVID-19 公共卫生研究:澳大利亚维多利亚州寻求不同视角的研究设计调整。

Inclusion of Cultural and Linguistic Diversity in COVID-19 Public Health Research: Research Design Adaptations to Seek Different Perspectives in Victoria, Australia.

机构信息

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.

The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2320. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032320.

Abstract

Participation of people from culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities in public health research is often limited by challenges with recruitment, retention and second-language data collection. Consequently, people from CALD communities are at risk of their needs being marginalised in public health interventions. This paper presents intrinsic case analyses of two studies which were adapted to increase the cultural competence of research processes. Both cases were part of the Optimise study, a major mixed methods research study in Australia which provided evidence to inform the Victorian state government's decision-making about COVID-19 public health measures. Case study 1 involved the core Optimise longitudinal cohort study and Case study 2 was the CARE Victorian representative survey, an Optimise sub-study. Both case studies engaged cultural advisors and bilingual staff to adjust the survey measures and research processes to suit target CALD communities. Reflexive processes provided insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the inclusive strategies. Selected survey results are provided, demonstrating variation across CALD communities and in comparison to participants who reported speaking English at home. While in most cases a gradient of disadvantage was evident for CALD communities, some patterns were unexpected. The case studies demonstrate the challenge and value of investing in culturally competent research processes to ensure research guiding policy captures a spectrum of experiences and perspectives.

摘要

来自文化和语言多样化(CALD)社区的人参与公共卫生研究常常受到招募、保留和第二语言数据收集方面的挑战的限制。因此,来自 CALD 社区的人面临着他们的需求在公共卫生干预中被边缘化的风险。本文对两项研究进行了内在案例分析,这些研究进行了调整,以提高研究过程的文化能力。这两个案例都是澳大利亚大型混合方法研究“Optimise”的一部分,该研究提供了证据,为维多利亚州政府关于 COVID-19 公共卫生措施的决策提供了信息。案例研究 1 涉及核心 Optimise 纵向队列研究,案例研究 2 是 Optimise 的子研究——CARE 维多利亚州代表性调查。这两个案例研究都聘请了文化顾问和双语工作人员,以调整调查措施和研究过程,以适应目标 CALD 社区。反思性过程提供了对包容性策略的优势和劣势的深入了解。提供了部分调查结果,展示了不同的 CALD 社区之间的差异,并与在家中说英语的参与者进行了比较。虽然在大多数情况下,CALD 社区的劣势程度明显,但有些模式是出乎意料的。这些案例研究表明,投资于具有文化能力的研究过程以确保指导政策的研究能够捕捉到一系列的经验和观点,这是具有挑战性和价值的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbe9/9916203/41176161a6dd/ijerph-20-02320-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验