• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性伤口老年患者中伤口生活质量问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学特性。

Psychometric properties of Persian version of wound-QOL questionnaire among older adults suffering from chronic wounds.

作者信息

Savadkoohi Hamed, Barasteh Salman, Ebadi Abbas, Ashrafizadeh Hadis, Akbarzadeh Amirdehi Mahdi, Safdari Ali, Mollahadi Mohsen, Oghli Saeid Hossein

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;13:1041754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041754. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041754
PMID:36778173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9909697/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic wounds experience various biopsychosocial problems which severely affects their quality of life (QoL). Thus, a Persian instrument to assess the QoL of these patients is required. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the wound-QOL questionnaire.

METHODS

This methodological study was performed on Iranian patients during 2021-2022. The translation was carried out forward-backward method. Face validity was addressed with 10 patients and content validity with 12 wound specialists. Construct validity was also assessed by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) ( = 100) and convergent validation with EQ-5D-3L plus Pain VAS Score and known-groups validity. The reliability was assessed by internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients with chronic wounds were included in the study. Two factors with cumulative variance of 65.39% were extracted during EFA. The results revealed a significant and high correlation between the total scores of wound-QOL questionnaire, the Persian version of EQ-5D-3L ( = 0.000, = 0.502), and Pain score (0-10; = 0.000, = 0.627). The Cronbach's alpha was 0.743 and stability of the questionnaire ( = 0.872) was confirmed. In confirming the known-groups validity, the results showed that this tool can differentiate the QOL of patients with different wounds.

CONCLUSION

The Persian version of the wound-QOL questionnaire is a valid and reliable questionnaire which can measure the QoL of patients with chronic wounds. This instrument can be used in clinical evaluation as well as research purposes across the Iranian population.

摘要

背景

慢性伤口患者会经历各种生物心理社会问题,这严重影响他们的生活质量(QoL)。因此,需要一种波斯语工具来评估这些患者的生活质量。本研究旨在确定伤口QOL问卷波斯语版本的心理测量特性。

方法

本方法学研究于2021年至2022年对伊朗患者进行。采用正向-反向翻译法。通过10名患者评估表面效度,12名伤口专家评估内容效度。还通过进行探索性因子分析(EFA)(n = 100)、与EQ-5D-3L加疼痛视觉模拟评分进行收敛效度验证以及已知群体效度来评估结构效度。通过使用Cronbach's alpha系数进行内部一致性和重测来评估信度。

结果

本研究共纳入100例慢性伤口患者。在EFA过程中提取了两个累积方差为65.39%的因子。结果显示,伤口QOL问卷总分与波斯语版本的EQ-5D-3L(r = 0.000,p = 0.502)和疼痛评分(0 - 10;r = 0.000,p = 0.627)之间存在显著且高度的相关性。Cronbach's alpha为0.743,问卷的稳定性(r = 0.872)得到证实。在确认已知群体效度时,结果表明该工具可以区分不同伤口患者的生活质量。

结论

伤口QOL问卷波斯语版本是一种有效且可靠的问卷,可用于测量慢性伤口患者的生活质量。该工具可用于伊朗人群的临床评估以及研究目的。

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of Persian version of wound-QOL questionnaire among older adults suffering from chronic wounds.慢性伤口老年患者中伤口生活质量问卷波斯语版本的心理测量学特性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 26;13:1041754. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041754. eCollection 2022.
2
Persian version of the brief Older People's Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL-brief): the evaluation of the psychometric properties.简要老年人生活质量问卷(OPQOL-brief)的波斯语版本:心理测量特性评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 7;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01586-8.
3
A translation and preliminary validation of the Dutch Wound-QoL questionnaire.荷兰伤口生活质量问卷的翻译及初步验证
BMC Dermatol. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12895-020-00101-2.
4
Psychometric Properties of the "Quality of Life in Life-Threatening Illness-Family Carer Version" (QOLLTI-F) in Persian-Speaking Carers of COVID-19 Patients.《“危及生命疾病中的生活质量 - 家庭照顾者版本”(QOLLTI - F)在新冠肺炎患者波斯语照顾者中的心理测量特性》
Front Psychol. 2022 May 3;13:838074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838074. eCollection 2022.
5
Validity and Reliability of The Persian Version of Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire: A Psychometric Study.子宫肌瘤症状与健康相关生活质量问卷波斯语版的效度和信度:一项心理测量学研究。
Int J Fertil Steril. 2023 Nov 7;18(1):60-66. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.1988864.1431.
6
Psychometric properties of the Persian translation of maternal postpartum quality of life questionnaire (MAPP-QOL).产妇产后生活质量问卷(MAPP-QOL)波斯语翻译版的心理计量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 May 8;19(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01781-1.
7
Translation and validation of 17-item Wound-QoL questionnaire in a Chinese population.在中文人群中翻译和验证 17 项伤口生活质量问卷。
Int Wound J. 2023 Mar;20(3):659-668. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13907. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
8
Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the breast cancer awareness measure (BCAM) questionnaire.跨文化调适与验证乳腺癌认知测量表(BCAM)波斯文版本。
Cancer Med. 2018 Oct;7(10):5237-5251. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1740. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
9
Stroke specific quality of life questionnaire: Test of reliability and validity of the Persian version.卒中特异性生活质量问卷:波斯语版本的信效度检验
Iran J Neurol. 2015 Apr 4;14(2):94-100.
10
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of food preferences questionnaire (Persian-FPQ) in Iranian adolescents.伊朗青少年食物偏好问卷(波斯语版)的有效性和可靠性。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 20;14(1):11493. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61433-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and psychometric validation of the Persian version of the toxic leadership behaviors questionnaire in nursing management.护理管理中毒性领导行为问卷波斯语版本的翻译及心理测量学验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):770. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03330-3.
2
Validity, reliability and dimensionality of the Norwegian version of Wound-QoL.挪威版伤口生活质量量表的效度、信度和维度
Int Wound J. 2025 May;22(5):e70051. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70051.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS) in Adult Patients With Cancer.成人癌症患者中姑息治疗结果量表(POS)波斯语版本的心理测量学特性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 28;13:858684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858684. eCollection 2022.
2
Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2020 Compendium of Estimates.人类创伤及其负担:2020 年最新估计综合报告。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 May;10(5):281-292. doi: 10.1089/wound.2021.0026.
3
Development and psychometric evaluation of the U.S. English Wound-QoL questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in people with chronic wounds.美国英语伤口生活质量问卷的编制及心理测量学评价,用于评估慢性伤口患者的健康相关生活质量。
Wound Repair Regen. 2020 Sep;28(5):609-616. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12837. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
4
Validation of the Spanish Wound-QoL Questionnaire.《西班牙伤口生活质量问卷》的验证。
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan;112(1):44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
5
A translation and preliminary validation of the Dutch Wound-QoL questionnaire.荷兰伤口生活质量问卷的翻译及初步验证
BMC Dermatol. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12895-020-00101-2.
6
Prevalence of chronic wounds in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.一般人群中慢性伤口的患病率:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;29:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
7
Translation and Validation of a Wound-specific, Quality-of-life Instrument (The Wound-QoL) in a Swedish Population.一种伤口特异性生活质量工具(伤口生活质量量表,Wound-QoL)在瑞典人群中的翻译与验证
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2018 May;64(5):40-46.
8
Validity and feasibility of the wound-QoL questionnaire on health-related quality of life in chronic wounds.伤口-QoL问卷对慢性伤口健康相关生活质量评估的有效性和可行性
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Sep;25(5):852-857. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12583. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Quality of life in patients with chronic wounds: magnitude of changes and predictive factors.慢性伤口患者的生活质量:变化程度及预测因素
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2017 Oct 9;51:e03250. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2016049603250.
10
Quality of life assessment of patients with and without venous ulcer.有和没有静脉溃疡患者的生活质量评估
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014 Jul-Aug;22(4):576-81. doi: 10.1590/0104-1169.3304.2454.