Greggianin Bruna F, Marques Ana Elizia M, Amato Angélica A, de Lima Caroline L
Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Laboratory of Oral Histopathology. Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Brasilia, Brasília, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Apr;27(4):1329-1342. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04879-6. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address whether non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) can affect insulin resistance, estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), in adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus and periodontitis.
Six electronic databases and the gray literature were systematically searched for interventional studies reporting NSPT effect on insulin resistance. Seven studies met the eligibility criteria to be synthesized in the qualitative analysis, six reporting change in HOMA-IR, three reporting change in HOMA-%S, and two in HOMA-β. Among them, four were pooled in a meta-analysis of standardized mean difference (SMD) of HOMA-IR; comparing pre- and post-intervention values, three were pooled considering HOMA-%S as outcome, and two studies were summarized considering SMD of HOMA-%S between intervention and control groups. HOMA-β results were qualitatively synthetized.
With low level of certainty, NSPT significantly reduced HOMA-IR, when compared with pre-intervention data (SMD, -0.35, 95% CI -0.63 to 0.07, p=0.02). There were no significant changes in HOMA-%S or in HOMA-β scores. The level of certainty was very low and moderate, respectively.
Assertions about a causal link between NSPT and insulin resistance are weak and conflicting, although our more robust results point out to the absence of effect. .
Because further high-quality studies assessing the relationship between periodontitis and insulin resistance are need, the findings of the current systematic review are limited to give recommendations for clinicians. However, while identifying a lack of research in humans with T2D concerning periodontitis and insulin resistance, this study reinforces the need of multicenter well-designed randomized clinical trials.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在探讨非手术牙周治疗(NSPT)是否会影响采用稳态模型评估(HOMA)估算的胰岛素抵抗,研究对象为患有糖尿病前期或2型糖尿病且患有牙周炎的成年人。
系统检索了六个电子数据库和灰色文献,以查找报告NSPT对胰岛素抵抗影响的干预性研究。七项研究符合纳入定性分析的标准,六项报告了HOMA-IR的变化,三项报告了HOMA-%S的变化,两项报告了HOMA-β的变化。其中,四项纳入HOMA-IR标准化均数差(SMD)的荟萃分析;比较干预前后的值,三项将HOMA-%S作为结果进行汇总,两项研究汇总了干预组与对照组之间HOMA-%S的SMD。对HOMA-β结果进行了定性综合分析。
与干预前数据相比,NSPT显著降低了HOMA-IR,但确定性较低(SMD,-0.35,95%CI -0.63至0.07,p=0.02)。HOMA-%S或HOMA-β评分无显著变化。确定性水平分别为非常低和中等。
关于NSPT与胰岛素抵抗之间因果关系的断言薄弱且相互矛盾,尽管我们更有力的结果表明不存在影响。
由于需要进一步的高质量研究来评估牙周炎与胰岛素抵抗之间的关系,目前系统评价的结果仅限于为临床医生提供建议。然而,在确定2型糖尿病患者中关于牙周炎和胰岛素抵抗的研究不足的同时,本研究强调了多中心精心设计的随机临床试验的必要性。