• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感效能:与工作相关的情商作为组织公民行为的预测指标

Affectively effective: Work-related emotional intelligence as a predictor of organizational citizenship.

作者信息

Robinson Michael D, Irvin Roberta L, Krishnakumar Sukumarakurup

机构信息

Psychology Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, United States.

Henry E. Riggs School of Applied Life Sciences, Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences, Claremont, CA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1092254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092254. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092254
PMID:36844352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9945536/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Efforts to link ability-related emotional intelligence to organizational behavior have resulted in modest findings.

METHODS

The present three studies examine whether a work-contextualized form of emotional intelligence (W-EI) may have greater predictive value, particularly in the organizational citizenship domain. Because W-EI should benefit social relationships within the workplace, positive associations between W-EI and organizational citizenship behavior were hypothesized.

RESULTS

This hypothesis was supported in three studies (total = 462) involving samples of part-time student employees (Study 1), postdoctoral researchers (Study 2), and full-time employees (Study 3). All studies also provided evidence for incremental validity, such as with respect to the Big 5 personality traits, and Study 3 highlighted processes related to workplace engagement (in the form of higher levels of interpersonal job satisfaction and lower levels of burnout).

DISCUSSION

The results demonstrate the importance of W-EI in understanding employee variations in organizational citizenship.

摘要

引言

将与能力相关的情商与组织行为联系起来的努力取得的成果并不显著。

方法

目前的三项研究考察了工作情境化的情商形式(W-EI)是否可能具有更大的预测价值,特别是在组织公民行为领域。由于W-EI应该有利于工作场所内的社会关系,因此假设W-EI与组织公民行为之间存在正相关。

结果

这一假设在三项研究(共462名)中得到了支持,这些研究的样本包括兼职学生员工(研究1)、博士后研究人员(研究2)和全职员工(研究3)。所有研究还提供了增量效度的证据,比如相对于大五人格特质而言,研究3突出了与工作投入相关的过程(以更高水平的人际工作满意度和更低水平的倦怠的形式)。

讨论

结果证明了W-EI在理解员工在组织公民行为方面差异的重要性。

相似文献

1
Affectively effective: Work-related emotional intelligence as a predictor of organizational citizenship.情感效能:与工作相关的情商作为组织公民行为的预测指标
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;14:1092254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1092254. eCollection 2023.
2
Nexus between organizational citizenship behavior and psychological wellbeing: emotional intelligence as a pathway.组织公民行为与心理健康之间的联系:以情商为途径
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 21;15:1389253. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1389253. eCollection 2024.
3
A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Emotional Intelligence and Employee Outcomes.情商与员工工作成果关系的元分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;13:611348. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.611348. eCollection 2022.
4
Empowering teachers through principals' emotional intelligence: Unlocking the potential of organizational citizenship behavior in Taiwan's elementary schools.通过校长的情商赋能教师:挖掘台湾小学组织公民行为的潜力。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Mar;243:104142. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104142. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
5
Utilizing Green Design as Workplace Innovation to Relieve Service Employee Stress in the Luxury Hotel Sector.利用绿色设计作为工作场所创新,缓解豪华酒店服务业员工压力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124527.
6
How Does Emotional Intelligence Make One Feel Better at Work? The Mediational Role of Work Engagement.情绪智力如何让人们在工作中感觉更好?工作投入的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 2;15(9):1909. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091909.
7
Is supervisory communication more important than co-worker communication for employees' engagement behavior in China? A moderated mediation analysis.监管沟通对中国员工敬业行为比同事沟通更重要吗?一个被调节的中介分析。
Work. 2023;75(1):253-263. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211425.
8
The five-factor model of personality traits and organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis.人格特质五因素模型与组织公民行为:元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Nov;96(6):1140-66. doi: 10.1037/a0024004. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
9
Relationship between emotional intelligence and organizational citizenship behavior in critical and emergency nurses in south east of Iran.伊朗东南部重症与急诊护士的情商与组织公民行为之间的关系
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2015 Jan;25(1):79-88. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v25i1.11.
10
A world of opportunity: A top-down influence of emotional intelligence-related contextual factors on employee engagement and exhaustion.机遇的世界:与情商相关的情境因素对员工敬业度和倦怠的自上而下的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 26;13:980339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.980339. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Working Smarter: Work-Related Emotional Intelligence and the Family-Work Interface.更聪明地工作:与工作相关的情商及工作与家庭的界面
J Intell. 2025 May 21;13(5):58. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13050058.
2
Attuned to the Flux of Life: Relations Between Ability Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Reactivity.顺应生活的变化:能力型情商与情绪反应性之间的关系。
Affect Sci. 2024 Jun 1;5(2):115-128. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00241-5. eCollection 2024 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Bipolar or Independent? Relations Between Positive and Negative Affect Vary by Emotional Intelligence.双相情感还是独立存在?积极情感与消极情感之间的关系因情商而异。
Affect Sci. 2020 Oct 6;1(4):225-236. doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00018-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Are You a Good Friend? Assessing Social Relationship Competence Using Situational Judgments.你是一个好朋友吗?使用情境判断评估社交关系能力。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Jun;46(6):913-926. doi: 10.1177/0146167219880193. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
3
The Geneva Emotional Competence Test (GECo): An ability measure of workplace emotional intelligence.日内瓦情绪能力测试(GECo):一种职场情绪智力的能力衡量工具。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Apr;104(4):559-580. doi: 10.1037/apl0000365. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
4
The relationship between empathy and emotional intelligence among Iranian nursing students.伊朗护理专业学生的同理心与情商之间的关系。
Int J Med Educ. 2018 Sep 19;9:239-243. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5b83.e2a5.
5
Cross-Sectional Analysis of Longitudinal Mediation Processes.横断面分析纵向中介过程。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 May-Jun;53(3):375-402. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1454822. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence: Gender Differences in Development and Links with Empathy.青少年亲社会行为:发展中的性别差异及其与同理心的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 May;47(5):1086-1099. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Introducing a short version of the Geneva Emotion Recognition Test (GERT-S): Psychometric properties and construct validation.介绍日内瓦情绪识别测试简版(GERT-S):心理测量特性与结构效度验证
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1383-1392. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0646-4.
8
A Comparison of Three Job Engagement Measures: Examining their Factorial and Criterion-Related Validity.三种工作投入测量方法的比较:检验其因子和效标关联效度。
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2012 Mar;4(1):67-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01059.x. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
9
Which Personality Attributes Are Most Important in the Workplace?职场中最重要的人格特质有哪些?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):538-51. doi: 10.1177/1745691614543972.
10
Assessing Workplace Emotional Intelligence: Development and Validation of an Ability-based Measure.评估职场情商:一种基于能力的测量方法的开发与验证
J Psychol. 2016;150(3):371-404. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2015.1057096. Epub 2015 Jul 15.