• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PRO-CTCAE® 采用 24 小时回顾期的日常报告的可靠性和有效性。

Reliability and validity of PRO-CTCAE® daily reporting with a 24-hour recall period.

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2023 Jul;32(7):2047-2058. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03374-5. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-023-03374-5
PMID:36897529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10241696/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The standard recall period for the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE®) is the past 7 days, but there are contexts where a 24-hour recall may be desirable. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the reliability and validity of a subset of PRO-CTCAE items captured using a 24-hour recall.

METHODS

27 PRO-CTCAE items representing 14 symptomatic adverse events (AEs) were collected using both a 24-hour recall (24 h) and the standard 7 day recall (7d) in a sample of patients receiving active cancer treatment (n = 113). Using data captured with a PRO-CTCAE-24h on days 6 and 7, and 20 and 21, we computed intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC); an ICC ≥ 0.70 was interpreted as demonstrating high test-retest reliability. Correlations between PRO-CTCAE-24h items on day 7 and conceptually relevant EORTC QLQ-C30 domains were examined. In responsiveness analysis, patients were deemed changed if they had a one-point or greater change in the corresponding PRO-CTCAE-7d item (from week 0 to week 1).

RESULTS

PRO-CTCAE-24h captured on two consecutive days demonstrated that 21 of 27 items (78%) had ICCs ≥ 0.70 (day 6/7 median ICC 0.76), (day 20/21 median ICC 0.84). Median correlation between attributes within a common AE was 0.75, and the median correlation between conceptually relevant EORTC QLQ-C30 domains and PRO-CTCAE-24 h items captured on day 7 was 0.44. In the analysis of responsiveness to change, the median standardized response mean (SRM) for patients with improvement was - 0.52 and that for patients with worsening was 0.71.

CONCLUSION

A 24-hour recall period for PRO-CTCAE items has acceptable measurement properties and can inform day-to-day variations in symptomatic AEs when daily PRO-CTCAE administration is implemented in a clinical trial.

摘要

目的

患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE®)的标准回顾期为过去 7 天,但在某些情况下,24 小时回顾可能更可取。本分析的目的是研究使用 24 小时回顾收集的 PRO-CTCAE 项目子集的可靠性和有效性。

方法

在接受积极癌症治疗的患者样本中(n=113),使用 24 小时回顾(24h)和标准 7 天回顾(7d)收集了 27 个代表 14 种症状性不良事件(AE)的 PRO-CTCAE 项目。使用 PRO-CTCAE-24h 在第 6 天和第 7 天、第 20 天和第 21 天捕获的数据,我们计算了组内相关系数(ICC);ICC≥0.70 被解释为具有高测试-重测可靠性。检查了 PRO-CTCAE-24h 项目在第 7 天与概念上相关的 EORTC QLQ-C30 域之间的相关性。在反应性分析中,如果相应的 PRO-CTCAE-7d 项目有一个或更多的变化(从第 0 周到第 1 周),则认为患者有变化。

结果

在连续两天内捕获的 PRO-CTCAE-24h 表明,27 个项目中的 21 个(78%)具有 ICC≥0.70(第 6/7 天中位数 ICC 0.76),(第 20/21 天中位数 ICC 0.84)。常见 AE 内属性之间的中位数相关性为 0.75,概念上相关的 EORTC QLQ-C30 域与第 7 天捕获的 PRO-CTCAE-24h 项目之间的中位数相关性为 0.44。在对变化的反应性分析中,改善患者的中位标准化反应均值(SRM)为-0.52,恶化患者的 SRM 为 0.71。

结论

PRO-CTCAE 项目的 24 小时回顾期具有可接受的测量特性,当在临床试验中实施每日 PRO-CTCAE 管理时,可以提供症状性不良事件的日常变化信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/769c0a9d4c6f/11136_2023_3374_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/d7be7489337f/11136_2023_3374_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/12b0e60552a2/11136_2023_3374_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/da7292c6f78e/11136_2023_3374_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/769c0a9d4c6f/11136_2023_3374_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/d7be7489337f/11136_2023_3374_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/12b0e60552a2/11136_2023_3374_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/da7292c6f78e/11136_2023_3374_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/979a/10241696/769c0a9d4c6f/11136_2023_3374_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of PRO-CTCAE® daily reporting with a 24-hour recall period.PRO-CTCAE® 采用 24 小时回顾期的日常报告的可靠性和有效性。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Jul;32(7):2047-2058. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03374-5. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
2
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的有效性和可靠性。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639.
3
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Language Version of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局通用术语标准不良事件的韩语版的可靠性和有效性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 May;59(5):1082-1088.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.015. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
4
Identification of meaningful individual-level change thresholds for worsening on the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE®).确定患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE®)中恶化情况的有意义的个体水平变化阈值。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Feb;34(2):495-507. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03819-5. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
5
Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events.常见不良事件术语标准简体中文患者报告结局版本的有效性和可靠性。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jul 27;21(1):860. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08610-0.
6
Evaluation of different recall periods for the US National Cancer Institute's PRO-CTCAE.对美国国立癌症研究所的PRO-CTCAE不同召回期的评估。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):255-263. doi: 10.1177/1740774517698645. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
7
Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准患者报告结局(PRO-CTCAE)的平板电脑、交互式语音应答系统和纸质管理方式的模式等效性与可接受性
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Feb 19;14:24. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0426-6.
8
Validation of the German patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™).德国患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE™)版本的验证。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Dec;27(12):2294-2299. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw422. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
Comparison of EORTC QLQ-C30 and PRO-CTCAE™ Questionnaires on Six Symptom Items.EORTC QLQ-C30 和 PRO-CTCAE™ 问卷在六个症状项目上的比较。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Sep;56(3):421-429. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 25.
10
Validity and Reliability of the Pediatric Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.儿科患者报告结局通用术语标准不良事件版本的有效性和可靠性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Nov 1;112(11):1143-1152. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa016.

引用本文的文献

1
Daily Patient-Reported Symptoms as Predictors of Unplanned Health Care Encounters During Chemotherapy: Longitudinal Observational Study.化疗期间患者每日自我报告的症状作为非计划医疗就诊的预测因素:纵向观察研究
JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Aug 7:OP2500177. doi: 10.1200/OP-25-00177.
2
Comparison of immune-related adverse events and analysis of risk factors in older and younger rectal cancer patients receiving immunotherapy.接受免疫治疗的老年与青年直肠癌患者免疫相关不良事件的比较及危险因素分析
Am J Cancer Res. 2025 May 15;15(5):2153-2169. doi: 10.62347/QLFX5040. eCollection 2025.
3
Statistical properties of items and summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in a diverse cancer sample.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing test-retest reliability of patient-reported outcome measures using intraclass correlation coefficients: recommendations for selecting and documenting the analytical formula.评估患者报告结局测量的重测信度使用组内相关系数:选择和记录分析公式的建议。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):1029-1033. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2076-0. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
2
What Do "None," "Mild," "Moderate," "Severe," and "Very Severe" Mean to Patients With Cancer? Content Validity of PRO-CTCAE™ Response Scales.“无”“轻度”“中度”“重度”和“极重度”对癌症患者意味着什么?PRO-CTCAE™反应量表的内容效度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Mar;55(3):e3-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.10.024. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
3
不同癌症样本中患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的项目和汇总分数的统计特性。
Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;22(2):161-169. doi: 10.1177/17407745241286065. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
4
Introduction and validation of the open symptom framework: a public domain modular framework for patient-reported measurement of symptoms related to cancer and its treatment.引言和开放式症状框架的验证:一个用于患者报告癌症及其治疗相关症状的公共领域模块化框架。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):2349-2358. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03656-6. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Intensive Longitudinal Methods Among Adults With Breast or Lung Cancer: Scoping Review.成人乳腺癌或肺癌的密集纵向方法:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 12;26:e50224. doi: 10.2196/50224.
6
Effects of a change in recall period on reporting severe symptoms: an analysis of a pragmatic multisite trial.回顾期变化对严重症状报告的影响:一项实用多中心试验分析。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Jul 1;116(7):1137-1144. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae049.
7
Testing a Model of Care for Patients on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Based on Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Randomized Phase II Controlled Trial.基于电子患者报告结局的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗患者护理模式测试:一项随机II期对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 18;12:e48386. doi: 10.2196/48386.
Evaluation of different recall periods for the US National Cancer Institute's PRO-CTCAE.
对美国国立癌症研究所的PRO-CTCAE不同召回期的评估。
Clin Trials. 2017 Jun;14(3):255-263. doi: 10.1177/1740774517698645. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
4
Mode equivalence and acceptability of tablet computer-, interactive voice response system-, and paper-based administration of the U.S. National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国立癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准患者报告结局(PRO-CTCAE)的平板电脑、交互式语音应答系统和纸质管理方式的模式等效性与可接受性
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Feb 19;14:24. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0426-6.
5
Focusing on Core Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Symptomatic Adverse Events, Physical Function, and Disease-Related Symptoms.关注癌症临床试验中的核心患者报告结局:症状性不良事件、身体功能和疾病相关症状。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 1;22(7):1553-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2035. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).美国国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的有效性和可靠性。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639.
7
Development of the National Cancer Institute's patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE).国家癌症研究所患者报告结局版通用不良事件术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的制定。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 29;106(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju244. Print 2014 Sep.
8
Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in prostate cancer treatment trials.推荐用于前列腺癌治疗试验的患者报告核心症状集。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Jul 8;106(7). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju132. Print 2014 Jul.
9
Accuracy of 30-day recall for components of sexual function and the moderating effects of gender and mood.30 天记忆法评估性功能各方面的准确性及性别和情绪的调节作用。
J Sex Med. 2014 Mar;11(3):678-96. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12225. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
10
A literature synthesis of symptom prevalence and severity in persons receiving active cancer treatment.接受癌症治疗者症状的流行率和严重度的文献综合
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1525-50. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1688-0. Epub 2013 Jan 12.