Suppr超能文献

不同癌症样本中患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE)的项目和汇总分数的统计特性。

Statistical properties of items and summary scores from the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in a diverse cancer sample.

作者信息

Mead-Harvey Carolyn, Basch Ethan, Rogak Lauren J, Langlais Blake T, Thanarajasingam Gita, Ginos Brenda F, Lee Minji K, Yee Claire, Mitchell Sandra A, Minasian Lori M, Mendoza Tito R, Bennett Antonia V, Schrag Deborah, Dueck Amylou C, Mazza Gina L

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Clin Trials. 2025 Apr;22(2):161-169. doi: 10.1177/17407745241286065. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) was developed to capture symptomatic adverse events from the patient perspective. We aim to describe statistical properties of PRO-CTCAE items and summary scores and to provide evidence for recommendations regarding PRO-CTCAE administration and reporting.

METHODS

Using data from the PRO-CTCAE validation study (NCT02158637), prevalence, means, and standard deviations of PRO-CTCAE items, composite scores, and mean and maximum scores across attributes (frequency, severity, and/or interference) of symptomatic adverse events were calculated. For each adverse event, correlations and agreement between attributes, correlations between attributes and composite scores, and correlations between composite, mean, and maximum scores were estimated.

RESULTS

PRO-CTCAE items were completed by 899 patients with various cancer types. Most patients reported experiencing one or more adverse events, with the most prevalent being fatigue (87.7%), sad/unhappy feelings (66.0%), anxiety (63.6%), pain (63.2%), insomnia (61.8%), and dry mouth (60.0%). Attributes were moderately to strongly correlated within an adverse event ( = 0.53 to 0.77, all  < 0.001) but not fully concordant (κ = 0.26 to 0.60, all  < 0.001), with interference demonstrating lowest mean scores and prevalence among attributes of the same adverse event. Attributes were moderately to strongly correlated with composite scores ( = 0.67 to 0.97, all  < 0.001). Composite scores were moderately to strongly correlated with mean and maximum scores for the same adverse event ( = 0.69 to 0.94, all  < 0.001). Correlations between composite scores of different adverse events varied widely ( = 0.04 to 0.68) but were moderate to strong for conceptually related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Results provide evidence for PRO-CTCAE administration and reporting recommendations that the full complement of attributes be administered for each adverse event, and that attributes as well as summary scores be reported.

摘要

背景/目的:不良事件通用术语标准的患者报告结局版本(PRO-CTCAE)旨在从患者角度捕捉有症状的不良事件。我们旨在描述PRO-CTCAE项目和汇总分数的统计特性,并为有关PRO-CTCAE管理和报告的建议提供证据。

方法

使用PRO-CTCAE验证研究(NCT02158637)的数据,计算PRO-CTCAE项目、综合分数以及有症状不良事件各属性(频率、严重程度和/或干扰)的平均分数和最高分数的患病率、均值和标准差。对于每个不良事件,估计各属性之间的相关性和一致性、属性与综合分数之间的相关性以及综合分数、平均分数和最高分数之间的相关性。

结果

899例患有各种癌症类型的患者完成了PRO-CTCAE项目。大多数患者报告经历了一种或多种不良事件,最常见的是疲劳(87.7%)、悲伤/不愉快情绪(66.0%)、焦虑(63.6%)、疼痛(63.2%)、失眠(61.8%)和口干(60.0%)。在一个不良事件中,各属性之间存在中度至高度相关性(r = 0.53至0.77,均P < 0.001),但并非完全一致(κ = 0.26至0.60,均P < 0.001),干扰在同一不良事件的各属性中显示出最低的平均分数和患病率。各属性与综合分数之间存在中度至高度相关性(r = 0.67至0.97,均P < 0.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/970f/11986086/307ec04b52c4/10.1177_17407745241286065-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验