Suppr超能文献

关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(COVID-19)疫苗各方面的综合综述

A Comprehensive Review on Various Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines.

作者信息

Pordanjani Sajjad Rahimi, Pordanjani Ali Rahimi, Askarpour Hasan, Arjmand Mehrdad, Babakhanian Masoudeh, Amiri Masoud, Mazaheri Elaheh

机构信息

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Prev Med. 2022 Nov 28;13:151. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_513_21. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

This is a comprehensive review based on the published papers in the field of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. Many efforts have been made to develop vaccines to combat this pandemic. Since December 2020, more than 200 vaccines have been tested in various research stages and in clinical trials on humans, of which eight vaccines reached phase four clinical trials in humans and approved by FDA and EUA. After the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had the highest efficacy (95%), the efficacy of the other vaccines are as follows: Moderna 94.5%, Sputnik V 91%, Novavax 89.7%, Sinopharm 79.3%, Oxford/AstraZenaca 70.4%, Johnson and Johnson 66.9%, and Sinovac 50.7%. At present, protein-based vaccines, with 35% of all available COVID-19 vaccines, are the most common technique in the vaccine production, and then there are vaccines of non-replicating viral vector (13.3%), mRNA1 (12.1%), DNA (10.2%), replicating viral vector (9.8%), and inactivated vaccines (8.2%). The most frequently recognized adverse effects within 7 days of each vaccine dose involved fever, fatigue, headache, chill, and myalgia. The mRNA-based vaccines were associated with a higher occurrence of local side effects (78.3 vs. 70.4%; Sig. = 0.064), whereas the viral vector-based vaccine was associated with a higher prevalence of systemic side effects (87.2 vs. 61%; Sig. < 0.001). Based on the evidence and articles in the field of vaccination, AstraZeneca-Oxford and Sinopharm vaccines reported the highest and lowest side effects, respectively. Because of being emerging, pathogenicity, and high infectivity of COVID-19, vaccination against the disease to prevent its incident rate and decrease the prevalence rate is recommended immediately. Being informed of various aspects of the existing vaccines such as efficacy, effectiveness, safety, etc.can accelerate to make effective and useful choices and consequently have a vaccinated community against the epidemic.

摘要

这是一篇基于新冠疫苗及疫苗接种领域已发表论文的综述。为抗击这一疫情,人们付出了诸多努力来研发疫苗。自2020年12月以来,超过200种疫苗在不同研究阶段及人体临床试验中接受了测试,其中8种疫苗进入了人体IV期临床试验并获得了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和紧急使用授权(EUA)的批准。在辉瑞 - 生物科技疫苗(有效率最高,达95%)之后,其他疫苗的有效率如下:莫德纳94.5%、卫星V号91%、诺瓦瓦克斯89.7%、国药79.3%、牛津/阿斯利康70.4%、强生66.9%、科兴50.7%。目前,基于蛋白质的疫苗占所有可用新冠疫苗的35%,是疫苗生产中最常见的技术,其次是非复制病毒载体疫苗(13.3%)、信使核糖核酸1(mRNA1,12.1%)、DNA疫苗(10.2%)、复制病毒载体疫苗(9.8%)和灭活疫苗(8.2%)。每次接种疫苗后7天内最常出现的不良反应包括发热、疲劳、头痛、寒战和肌痛。基于信使核糖核酸的疫苗出现局部副作用的发生率更高(78.3%对70.4%;显著性 = 0.064),而基于病毒载体的疫苗出现全身副作用的发生率更高(87.2%对61%;显著性 < 0.001)。根据疫苗接种领域的证据和文章,阿斯利康 - 牛津疫苗和国药疫苗分别报告了最高和最低的副作用发生率。鉴于新冠病毒的新出现、致病性和高传染性,建议立即接种该疾病疫苗以预防其发病率并降低流行率。了解现有疫苗的各个方面,如有效性、效果、安全性等,有助于加快做出有效且有用的选择,从而使社区能够接种疫苗以抵御疫情。

相似文献

3
Cardiovascular Complications of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines: An Overview.2019冠状病毒病疫苗的心血管并发症:概述
Cardiol Ther. 2022 Mar;11(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s40119-021-00248-0. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
7
Adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Iran.伊朗 COVID-19 疫苗接种的不良反应。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 18;22(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07411-5.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验